Experts’ views on recurrence and progression of varicose veins

V. Bogachev, O. A. Alukhanyan, G. N. Vanyan, S. M. Markin, A. S. Artemova, P. F. Kravtsov
{"title":"Experts’ views on recurrence and progression of varicose veins","authors":"V. Bogachev, O. A. Alukhanyan, G. N. Vanyan, S. M. Markin, A. S. Artemova, P. F. Kravtsov","doi":"10.21518/akh2024-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Despite modern advances in technologies for the treatment and prevention of varicose veins, there is currently no radical treatment for varicose veins. The probability of recurrence of dilated veins, according to various authors, ranges from 5 to 70%. Along with the well-established concept of recurrence of varicose veins, the term progression of varicose veins is increasingly common in everyday life.Aim. To study the current understanding of the term relapse and the practical attitude of specialists involved in the treatment of varicose veins to it.Material and methods. In 2023, a survey of 117 specialists on the recurrence/progression of varicose veins was conducted. The respondents were doctors involved in the treatment of varicose veins: vascular surgeons 22.4%, phlebologists 50%, general surgeons 19.8%, specialists in ultrasound/functional diagnostics 7.8%, X-ray endovascular surgeon 0.85%. The questionnaire included 18 questions regarding the frequency of visits of patients with relapse/progression of varicose veins; views on tactics, as well as the attitude of specialists to the issue of progression and recurrence of varicose veins in patients after its surgical treatment.Results and discussion. The concept of recurrence and progression of varicose veins among specialists dealing with this pathology is not always comparable. There are differences in views both on the predisposing factors for the recurrence of dilated veins, and, accordingly, on the tactics of treatment and preventive measures. In some cases, according to statistics, they are due to specialization.Conclusions. The incidence of relapse and progression at the reception of the respondents has a slight difference. Despite the fact that there are opinions that do not correspond to generally accepted and abhorrent collegiality, mostly specialists try to separate these concepts, see differences in provoking factors and, accordingly, in recommendations.","PeriodicalId":398195,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)","volume":" 387","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatornaya khirurgiya = Ambulatory Surgery (Russia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21518/akh2024-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Despite modern advances in technologies for the treatment and prevention of varicose veins, there is currently no radical treatment for varicose veins. The probability of recurrence of dilated veins, according to various authors, ranges from 5 to 70%. Along with the well-established concept of recurrence of varicose veins, the term progression of varicose veins is increasingly common in everyday life.Aim. To study the current understanding of the term relapse and the practical attitude of specialists involved in the treatment of varicose veins to it.Material and methods. In 2023, a survey of 117 specialists on the recurrence/progression of varicose veins was conducted. The respondents were doctors involved in the treatment of varicose veins: vascular surgeons 22.4%, phlebologists 50%, general surgeons 19.8%, specialists in ultrasound/functional diagnostics 7.8%, X-ray endovascular surgeon 0.85%. The questionnaire included 18 questions regarding the frequency of visits of patients with relapse/progression of varicose veins; views on tactics, as well as the attitude of specialists to the issue of progression and recurrence of varicose veins in patients after its surgical treatment.Results and discussion. The concept of recurrence and progression of varicose veins among specialists dealing with this pathology is not always comparable. There are differences in views both on the predisposing factors for the recurrence of dilated veins, and, accordingly, on the tactics of treatment and preventive measures. In some cases, according to statistics, they are due to specialization.Conclusions. The incidence of relapse and progression at the reception of the respondents has a slight difference. Despite the fact that there are opinions that do not correspond to generally accepted and abhorrent collegiality, mostly specialists try to separate these concepts, see differences in provoking factors and, accordingly, in recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家对静脉曲张复发和恶化的看法
导言。尽管现代治疗和预防静脉曲张的技术不断进步,但目前还没有根治静脉曲张的方法。根据不同学者的研究,扩张静脉的复发概率在 5% 至 70% 之间。随着静脉曲张复发概念的确立,静脉曲张进展一词在日常生活中也越来越常见。研究目前对复发一词的理解,以及参与静脉曲张治疗的专家对复发的实际态度。2023 年,对 117 名专家进行了关于静脉曲张复发/进展的调查。调查对象为参与静脉曲张治疗的医生:血管外科医生占 22.4%,静脉内科医生占 50%,普通外科医生占 19.8%,超声/功能诊断专家占 7.8%,X 射线血管内外科医生占 0.85%。调查问卷包括18个问题,涉及静脉曲张复发/进展患者的就诊频率、对战术的看法以及专家对手术治疗后静脉曲张进展和复发问题的态度。治疗静脉曲张的专科医生对静脉曲张复发和恶化的概念并不总是一致的。无论是在静脉扩张复发的诱发因素上,还是在治疗策略和预防措施上,都存在着不同的观点。据统计,在某些情况下,这些差异是由专业化造成的。受访者复发和恶化的发生率略有不同。尽管有些意见与普遍接受的和令人憎恶的合议意见不一致,但大多数专家都试图将这些概念分开,看到诱发因素的差异,并据此提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined use of oral and topical forms of phlebotonics after endovasal laser coagulation One-day surgery: treatment of grade 3–4 hemorrhoids in a day patient department Multifocal superficial thrombophlebitis of the extremities in HIV infection Possible complications associated with the use of cyanoacrylate obliteration in patients with varicose veins Chronic venous diseases and obesity: pathogenetically based treatment and prevention options
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1