Reliability of Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis by Clinical Assessment Through Modified ALVARADO Vs RIPASA Scoring System at Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi

Rohan Qamar, Khalid Mahmood, Romassa Javed, Faheem Sher, Ibrahim Tufail
{"title":"Reliability of Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis by Clinical Assessment Through Modified ALVARADO Vs RIPASA Scoring System at Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi","authors":"Rohan Qamar, Khalid Mahmood, Romassa Javed, Faheem Sher, Ibrahim Tufail","doi":"10.37185/lns.1.1.346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA (Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) andModified ALVARADO score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis by using histopathology as a gold standard.Study Design: A comparative cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Department of Surgery, Combined MilitaryHospital (CMH) Rawalpindi, Pakistan from January 2020 to August 2020.Methods: A total of 126 patients suspected of having acute appendicitis were included. All patients who hadmet the inclusion criteria were chosen via the process of consecutive sampling. Patients who had presentedwith right iliac fossa pain, migration of pain, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting and were admitted to the hospitalwere assessed prospectively using RIPASA and Modified ALVARADO scores. RIPASA (Raja Isteri Pengiran AnakSaleha Appendicitis) score > 7.5 and Modified ALVARADO score > 7 were used to diagnose acute appendicitis.The diagnosis was confirmed postoperatively using a histopathological report. Every scoring system wasassessed for validity by calculating sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, negative predictive value, andpositive predictive value.Result: The results obtained from individuals recruited in the study showthat out of 126 patients, 70(55.6%)were male and 56(44.4%) were female. The mean age was 33.25±8.19 years. 83.3% of patients having RIPASA(Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) score (≥7.5) and 68.3% of patients having Modified ALVARADOscore (≥7) have met the criteria for acute appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the RIPASA (Raja IsteriPengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) score were 90.9% and 73.3% compared with 73.8% and 73.3% of theModified Alvarado score.Conclusion: The RIPASA (Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) scoring system is a more convenient,accurate, and specific scoring system for our population than the Modified ALVARADO scoring system. \nHow to cite this: Qamar R, Mahmood K, Javed R, Sher F, Tufail I.Reliability of Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis by Clinical Assessment Through Modified Alvarado Vs Ripasa Scoring System. Life and Science.2024; 5(2): 193-198. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.346 \n ","PeriodicalId":516717,"journal":{"name":"Life and Science","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA (Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) andModified ALVARADO score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis by using histopathology as a gold standard.Study Design: A comparative cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Department of Surgery, Combined MilitaryHospital (CMH) Rawalpindi, Pakistan from January 2020 to August 2020.Methods: A total of 126 patients suspected of having acute appendicitis were included. All patients who hadmet the inclusion criteria were chosen via the process of consecutive sampling. Patients who had presentedwith right iliac fossa pain, migration of pain, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting and were admitted to the hospitalwere assessed prospectively using RIPASA and Modified ALVARADO scores. RIPASA (Raja Isteri Pengiran AnakSaleha Appendicitis) score > 7.5 and Modified ALVARADO score > 7 were used to diagnose acute appendicitis.The diagnosis was confirmed postoperatively using a histopathological report. Every scoring system wasassessed for validity by calculating sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, negative predictive value, andpositive predictive value.Result: The results obtained from individuals recruited in the study showthat out of 126 patients, 70(55.6%)were male and 56(44.4%) were female. The mean age was 33.25±8.19 years. 83.3% of patients having RIPASA(Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) score (≥7.5) and 68.3% of patients having Modified ALVARADOscore (≥7) have met the criteria for acute appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the RIPASA (Raja IsteriPengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) score were 90.9% and 73.3% compared with 73.8% and 73.3% of theModified Alvarado score.Conclusion: The RIPASA (Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis) scoring system is a more convenient,accurate, and specific scoring system for our population than the Modified ALVARADO scoring system. How to cite this: Qamar R, Mahmood K, Javed R, Sher F, Tufail I.Reliability of Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis by Clinical Assessment Through Modified Alvarado Vs Ripasa Scoring System. Life and Science.2024; 5(2): 193-198. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.346  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉瓦尔品第联合军事医院通过改良 ALVARADO 与 RIPASA 评分系统进行临床评估诊断急性阑尾炎的可靠性
目的以组织病理学作为金标准,确定RIPASA(Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis)和改良ALVARADO评分在诊断急性阑尾炎中的准确性:比较性横断面研究:研究地点和时间:2020年1月至2020年8月,研究在巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第联合军事医院(CMH)外科进行:方法:共纳入 126 名疑似急性阑尾炎患者。方法:共纳入 126 名疑似急性阑尾炎患者。使用 RIPASA 和改良 ALVARADO 评分对出现右髂窝疼痛、疼痛移位、厌食、恶心和呕吐并入院的患者进行前瞻性评估。RIPASA(Raja Isteri Pengiran AnakSaleha Appendicitis)评分>7.5分和改良ALVARADO评分>7分可用于诊断急性阑尾炎。通过计算敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值来评估每种评分系统的有效性:研究结果显示,126 名患者中,男性 70 人(55.6%),女性 56 人(44.4%)。平均年龄为(33.25±8.19)岁。83.3% 的患者的 RIPASA(Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis)评分(≥7.5)和 68.3% 的患者的改良 ALVARADO 评分(≥7)符合急性阑尾炎的标准。RIPASA(Raja IsteriPengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis)评分的敏感性和特异性分别为90.9%和73.3%,而改良阿尔瓦拉多评分的敏感性和特异性分别为73.8%和73.3%:RIPASA(Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis)评分系统比改良ALVARADO评分系统更方便、更准确、更特异,更适合我国人群。如何引用此文:Qamar R, Mahmood K, Javed R, Sher F, Tufail I.通过改良阿尔瓦拉多与里帕萨评分系统进行临床评估诊断急性阑尾炎的可靠性。2024; 5(2):193-198. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.346
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Awareness of the Green Dentistry Concept among Dental Professionals in Tertiary Care Dental Hospital, Rawalpindi Impact of Short-Term Arsenic Exposure on Hormonal Balance and Fibrosis in Sprague Dawley Rats Prevalence of Obesity with its Associated Modifiable Risk Factors among Adolescents of Aged 17-24 Years: Cross-Sectional Study Frequency of Self Medication Among Health Science Students in Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan Hepatoprotective Effect of Aqueous Neem Leaves Extract on Hepatocytes and Nuclear Diameter of Albino Wistar Rats Induced with Erythromycin Toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1