Comparison of Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and Co-Trimoxazole in Escherichia Coli Urinary Tract Infection

Muhammad Ayaz, Sayed Ali Zeeshan Kausar, Muhammad Alamgir, Shafiq Muhammad, Fayaz Muhammad Khan, Sami Ullah
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and Co-Trimoxazole in Escherichia Coli Urinary Tract Infection","authors":"Muhammad Ayaz, Sayed Ali Zeeshan Kausar, Muhammad Alamgir, Shafiq Muhammad, Fayaz Muhammad Khan, Sami Ullah","doi":"10.37185/lns.1.1.595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole in urinary tract infection due to Escherichia Coli.Study Design: A cross- sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of Medicine, Muhammad TeachingHospital (MTH), Peshawar, Pakistan from 1 July 2022 to 31 December 2022.Methods: Patients were randomly and consecutively assigned to either group by using lottery method (double blind). A total of 194 patients diagnosed with urinary tract infection due to E coli were randomly divided into two groups, 97 patients in each group, using 54% efficacy of ciprofloxacin, 74% efficacy of Co-Trimoxazole, 95% confidence level, and 90% power of test, using WHO software. “Group-A' for Ciprofloxacin 500mg BD and th 'Group-B' for Co-Trimoxazole 960mg BD. All the recruited patients were followed up after the 48 hour of their treatment and results were recorded. The chi-Square test was applied to compare the efficacy results of both drugs where a PValue < 0.05 was considered as significant value.Results: The mean age of group A participants were 48.4 + 11.1 years, whereas, in group B it was 48.2 + 11.5 years. There were 69.1% males and 30.9% females in group A compared to 80.4% males and 19.6% females ingroup B. After the 48 hour of end treatment, efficacy was 79.3% and 50.5%, in groups A and B respectively (p-value = 0.000).Conclusion: As compared to Cotrimoxazole, Ciprofloxacin is more effective in treating E. coli-caused urinary tract infections. \nHow to cite this: Ayaz M, Kausar SAZ, Alamgir M, Muhammad S, Khan FM, Ullah S. Comparison of Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and CoTrimoxazole in Escherichia Coli Urinary Tract Infection. Life and Science. 2024; 5(2): 151-159. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.595 \n ","PeriodicalId":516717,"journal":{"name":"Life and Science","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole in urinary tract infection due to Escherichia Coli.Study Design: A cross- sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of Medicine, Muhammad TeachingHospital (MTH), Peshawar, Pakistan from 1 July 2022 to 31 December 2022.Methods: Patients were randomly and consecutively assigned to either group by using lottery method (double blind). A total of 194 patients diagnosed with urinary tract infection due to E coli were randomly divided into two groups, 97 patients in each group, using 54% efficacy of ciprofloxacin, 74% efficacy of Co-Trimoxazole, 95% confidence level, and 90% power of test, using WHO software. “Group-A' for Ciprofloxacin 500mg BD and th 'Group-B' for Co-Trimoxazole 960mg BD. All the recruited patients were followed up after the 48 hour of their treatment and results were recorded. The chi-Square test was applied to compare the efficacy results of both drugs where a PValue < 0.05 was considered as significant value.Results: The mean age of group A participants were 48.4 + 11.1 years, whereas, in group B it was 48.2 + 11.5 years. There were 69.1% males and 30.9% females in group A compared to 80.4% males and 19.6% females ingroup B. After the 48 hour of end treatment, efficacy was 79.3% and 50.5%, in groups A and B respectively (p-value = 0.000).Conclusion: As compared to Cotrimoxazole, Ciprofloxacin is more effective in treating E. coli-caused urinary tract infections. How to cite this: Ayaz M, Kausar SAZ, Alamgir M, Muhammad S, Khan FM, Ullah S. Comparison of Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and CoTrimoxazole in Escherichia Coli Urinary Tract Infection. Life and Science. 2024; 5(2): 151-159. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.595  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环丙沙星与共三唑类药物对大肠杆菌尿路感染的疗效比较
研究目的比较环丙沙星和联合曲唑对大肠杆菌引起的尿路感染的疗效:横断面研究。研究地点和时间:本研究于 2022 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日在巴基斯坦白沙瓦穆罕默德教学医院(MTH)医学部进行:采用抽签法(双盲)将患者随机连续分配到任一组。共将 194 名确诊为大肠杆菌引起的尿路感染患者随机分为两组,每组 97 人,使用世界卫生组织的软件,环丙沙星的疗效为 54%,联合三唑的疗效为 74%,置信水平为 95%,检验功率为 90%。A组 "使用环丙沙星 500 毫克片剂,"B组 "使用联合曲唑 960 毫克片剂。在治疗 48 小时后,对所有招募的患者进行了随访,并记录了结果。采用卡方检验比较两种药物的疗效,PV 值小于 0.05 为显著值:A 组参与者的平均年龄为 48.4 + 11.1 岁,B 组参与者的平均年龄为 48.2 + 11.5 岁。治疗结束 48 小时后,A 组和 B 组的有效率分别为 79.3%和 50.5%(P 值 = 0.000):结论:与复方新诺明相比,环丙沙星治疗由大肠杆菌引起的尿路感染更有效。引用方式Ayaz M, Kausar SAZ, Alamgir M, Muhammad S, Khan FM, Ullah S. Comparison of Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and CoTrimoxazole in Escherichia Coli Urinary Tract Infection.生命与科学》。2024; 5(2):151-159. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.595
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Awareness of the Green Dentistry Concept among Dental Professionals in Tertiary Care Dental Hospital, Rawalpindi Impact of Short-Term Arsenic Exposure on Hormonal Balance and Fibrosis in Sprague Dawley Rats Prevalence of Obesity with its Associated Modifiable Risk Factors among Adolescents of Aged 17-24 Years: Cross-Sectional Study Frequency of Self Medication Among Health Science Students in Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan Hepatoprotective Effect of Aqueous Neem Leaves Extract on Hepatocytes and Nuclear Diameter of Albino Wistar Rats Induced with Erythromycin Toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1