Comparing Left Bundle Branch Area vs Right-Ventricular Septal Pacing in High-Degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Randomized Trial Study Protocol

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CJC Open Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.05.006
{"title":"Comparing Left Bundle Branch Area vs Right-Ventricular Septal Pacing in High-Degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Randomized Trial Study Protocol","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel method of conduction-system pacing in the muscular interventricular septum. Although LBBAP has been shown to produce physiologic electrical and mechanical intraventricular synchrony, superiority of LBBAP, compared to right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) at preserving normal left-ventricular (LV) systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been demonstrated. Left Bundle BRAVE is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, crossover study investigating the superiority of LBBAP, compared to RVSP, with respect to preservation of systolic function in patients with high-degree conduction disease after TAVR. Adults with severe aortic stenosis and normal systolic function who sustain high-grade atrioventricular block within 4 weeks of TAVR are eligible. All subjects receive a biventricular pacemaker generator with RVSP, and LBBAP leads. Participants are randomly assigned to 9 months of each pacing mode, in series. The primary endpoint is change in global longitudinal strain, tested in series with change in LV ejection fraction, comparing RVSP to LBBAP. Secondary endpoints include the following: echocardiographic markers of interventricular synchrony and right ventricular performance; heart failure functional status and symptom classification; 6-minute walk test results; pacemaker and lead performance; and brain natriuretic peptide concentration. The Left Bundle BRAVE study is designed to identify an upstream and clinically relevant marker of superiority in LBBAP, compared to RVSP, at preventing deterioration of LV function in patients with a high ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.</p></div><div><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier</h3><p>NCT05541679</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24002166/pdfft?md5=41919ab37a9b28b63927c797255e6ee2&pid=1-s2.0-S2589790X24002166-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24002166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel method of conduction-system pacing in the muscular interventricular septum. Although LBBAP has been shown to produce physiologic electrical and mechanical intraventricular synchrony, superiority of LBBAP, compared to right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) at preserving normal left-ventricular (LV) systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been demonstrated. Left Bundle BRAVE is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, crossover study investigating the superiority of LBBAP, compared to RVSP, with respect to preservation of systolic function in patients with high-degree conduction disease after TAVR. Adults with severe aortic stenosis and normal systolic function who sustain high-grade atrioventricular block within 4 weeks of TAVR are eligible. All subjects receive a biventricular pacemaker generator with RVSP, and LBBAP leads. Participants are randomly assigned to 9 months of each pacing mode, in series. The primary endpoint is change in global longitudinal strain, tested in series with change in LV ejection fraction, comparing RVSP to LBBAP. Secondary endpoints include the following: echocardiographic markers of interventricular synchrony and right ventricular performance; heart failure functional status and symptom classification; 6-minute walk test results; pacemaker and lead performance; and brain natriuretic peptide concentration. The Left Bundle BRAVE study is designed to identify an upstream and clinically relevant marker of superiority in LBBAP, compared to RVSP, at preventing deterioration of LV function in patients with a high ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT05541679

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左束支区与右室间隔起搏在 TAVR 术后高度传导疾病中的比较:随机试验研究方案 左束 BRAVE:研究方案。
左束支区起搏(LBBAP)是一种在肌性室间隔进行传导系统起搏的新方法。虽然左束支区起搏已被证明能产生生理上的心室内电气和机械同步,但与右室间隔起搏(RVSP)相比,左束支区起搏在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后保留正常左室收缩功能方面的优势尚未得到证实。左束 BRAVE 是一项由研究者发起的多中心、前瞻性、双盲、随机、交叉研究,旨在调查 LBBAP 与 RVSP 相比,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度传导疾病患者的收缩功能保护方面的优越性。患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄且收缩功能正常的成人,如果在 TAVR 术后 4 周内出现高度房室传导阻滞,则符合条件。所有受试者均接受带有 RVSP 和 LBBAP 导联的双心室起搏器。受试者被随机分配到每种起搏模式下进行为期 9 个月的系列治疗。主要终点是整体纵向应变的变化,与左心室射血分数的变化一起进行系列测试,比较 RVSP 和 LBBAP。次要终点包括:心室间同步性和右心室性能的超声心动图标记;心衰功能状态和症状分类;6 分钟步行测试结果;起搏器和导联性能;脑钠肽浓度。左束BRAVE研究旨在确定一个上游和临床相关的指标,以确定与RVSP相比,LBBAP在防止TAVR后心室起搏负担重的患者左心室功能恶化方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Safety of Ozanimod Use, a Novel Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Ligand, in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Oxygen: Secondary Analysis of the COZI Randomized Clinical Trial The Potential for Heart Donation After Death Determination by Circulatory Criteria in the Province of Québec Novel Noninvasive Index Combining Echocardiography and Computed Tomography for Screening for Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis Comparing Left Bundle Branch Area vs Right-Ventricular Septal Pacing in High-Degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Randomized Trial Study Protocol Time to Calm the Fick Down? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Thermodilution Compared to Direct Fick in Tricuspid Regurgitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1