Latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review

{"title":"Latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This paper aims to conduct a systematic review of the current literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes of concurrent latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD/TM) tendon transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and to compare that to isolated RSA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search on PubMeb, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL was performed from inception up to January 20, 2023, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Cohort studies, case-control studies, randomized controlled trials and case series that were written in English, which involved patients who underwent RSA with LD/TM transfer were included. Quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. Systematic review of Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and range of movement (ROM) was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight studies with a total of 265 patients were included. The average mean follow-up time was 42.5 months, with a range of 6 months to 136 months. Of the studies that reported outcomes of RSA with LD/TM transfer, five reported the CMS, five reported external rotation (ER) ROM and six reported forward flexion ROM. Comparing postoperative to preoperative scores, there was an improvement above the minimal clinically important difference for CMS (mean difference (MD) range = 22.40 to 41.80), ER (MD range = 29° to 36°) and forward flexion (MD range = 50° to 75°). Three studies that compared postoperative ER between RSA with and without LD/TM reported no significant difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RSA with LD/TM transfer has good clinical outcomes postoperatively, but there is insufficient comparative data to suggest that it is superior or inferior to an isolated RSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 379-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000774/pdfft?md5=a0410050d3578dddda772c65331cf738&pid=1-s2.0-S2666639124000774-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This paper aims to conduct a systematic review of the current literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes of concurrent latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD/TM) tendon transfer in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and to compare that to isolated RSA.

Methods

A comprehensive search on PubMeb, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL was performed from inception up to January 20, 2023, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Cohort studies, case-control studies, randomized controlled trials and case series that were written in English, which involved patients who underwent RSA with LD/TM transfer were included. Quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. Systematic review of Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and range of movement (ROM) was conducted.

Results

Eight studies with a total of 265 patients were included. The average mean follow-up time was 42.5 months, with a range of 6 months to 136 months. Of the studies that reported outcomes of RSA with LD/TM transfer, five reported the CMS, five reported external rotation (ER) ROM and six reported forward flexion ROM. Comparing postoperative to preoperative scores, there was an improvement above the minimal clinically important difference for CMS (mean difference (MD) range = 22.40 to 41.80), ER (MD range = 29° to 36°) and forward flexion (MD range = 50° to 75°). Three studies that compared postoperative ER between RSA with and without LD/TM reported no significant difference.

Conclusion

RSA with LD/TM transfer has good clinical outcomes postoperatively, but there is insufficient comparative data to suggest that it is superior or inferior to an isolated RSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反向肩关节置换术中的背阔肌和大圆肌转移:系统性综述
背景本文旨在对现有文献进行系统性综述,以评估反向肩关节置换术(RSA)中同时进行背阔肌和大圆肌(LD/TM)肌腱转移的临床疗效,并将其与孤立肩关节置换术(RSA)进行比较。研究纳入了用英语撰写的队列研究、病例对照研究、随机对照试验和病例系列研究,这些研究均涉及接受 RSA 和 LD/TM 转移的患者。研究质量采用 Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions 工具进行评估。对康斯坦茨-默里评分(CMS)和活动范围(ROM)进行了系统回顾。平均随访时间为 42.5 个月,从 6 个月到 136 个月不等。在报告RSA与LD/TM转移结果的研究中,5项报告了CMS,5项报告了外旋(ER)ROM,6项报告了前屈ROM。将术后评分与术前评分进行比较,发现CMS(平均差(MD)范围=22.40至41.80)、ER(MD范围=29°至36°)和前屈(MD范围=50°至75°)的改善幅度超过了最小临床重要性差异。有三项研究比较了有 LD/TM 和无 LD/TM 的 RSA 术后 ER,结果显示两者无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acute compartment syndrome following biceps tendon rupture: a case report. A spontaneously resolved varix in the spinoglenoid notch: a case report. Medialization of shaft of humerus to provide medial buttress and prevent varus collapse in 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: review of the surgical technique. Median nerve entrapment neuropathy: a review on the pronator syndrome. Coracoid osteotomy approach for open free bone grafting of anterior glenoid defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1