Effects of consecutive bed bathing with weak versus ordinary pressure on skin barrier recovery of hospitalised older adults: A within-person randomised controlled trial

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of tissue viability Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.008
Issei Konya , Mayumi Yoshida , Chiaki Watanabe , Akemi Morita , Rika Yano
{"title":"Effects of consecutive bed bathing with weak versus ordinary pressure on skin barrier recovery of hospitalised older adults: A within-person randomised controlled trial","authors":"Issei Konya ,&nbsp;Mayumi Yoshida ,&nbsp;Chiaki Watanabe ,&nbsp;Akemi Morita ,&nbsp;Rika Yano","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3><strong>Aim</strong></h3><p>Wiping pressure (WP [mmHg]) during bed baths is essential to maintain skin integrity and care quality for older adults. However, effects of different wiping pressures on skin barrier recovery over multiple days remain unclear. This study evaluated and compared the effects of consecutive bed bathing with weak pressure and that with ordinary pressure on skin barrier recovery of hospitalised older adults.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Methods</strong></h3><p>This within-person, randomised, controlled trial involved 254 forearms (127 patients) and was conducted at a general hospital. Forearms were blinded and randomly assigned a site and sequence of two bed bathing sessions: wiping three times with weak (10≤WP&lt;20) and ordinary pressure (20≤WP&lt;30) once per day for 2 consecutive days. The skin barrier was assessed daily based on transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) before and 15 min after the interventions. Dry skin was assessed using the overall dry skin score.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Results</strong></h3><p>A linear mixed model showed that the time courses of TEWL and SCH differed significantly between groups. Impaired skin barrier function caused by ordinary pressure on the first day did not recover to baseline values the next day, whereas weak pressure did not cause significant changes. During subgroup analyses, TEWL of patients with dry skin was more likely to increase with ordinary pressure.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Conclusions</strong></h3><p>Despite decreased skin barrier recovery experienced by older adults, our findings suggest the safety of weak pressure and highlight the importance of WP during bed baths. Weak pressure is particularly desirable for patients with dry skin.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Trial registration</strong></h3><p>UMIN000048838.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 504-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X24000706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Wiping pressure (WP [mmHg]) during bed baths is essential to maintain skin integrity and care quality for older adults. However, effects of different wiping pressures on skin barrier recovery over multiple days remain unclear. This study evaluated and compared the effects of consecutive bed bathing with weak pressure and that with ordinary pressure on skin barrier recovery of hospitalised older adults.

Methods

This within-person, randomised, controlled trial involved 254 forearms (127 patients) and was conducted at a general hospital. Forearms were blinded and randomly assigned a site and sequence of two bed bathing sessions: wiping three times with weak (10≤WP<20) and ordinary pressure (20≤WP<30) once per day for 2 consecutive days. The skin barrier was assessed daily based on transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) before and 15 min after the interventions. Dry skin was assessed using the overall dry skin score.

Results

A linear mixed model showed that the time courses of TEWL and SCH differed significantly between groups. Impaired skin barrier function caused by ordinary pressure on the first day did not recover to baseline values the next day, whereas weak pressure did not cause significant changes. During subgroup analyses, TEWL of patients with dry skin was more likely to increase with ordinary pressure.

Conclusions

Despite decreased skin barrier recovery experienced by older adults, our findings suggest the safety of weak pressure and highlight the importance of WP during bed baths. Weak pressure is particularly desirable for patients with dry skin.

Trial registration

UMIN000048838.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弱压与普通压力连续床浴对住院老年人皮肤屏障恢复的影响:人内随机对照试验
目的 在床上洗澡时,擦拭压力(WP [mmHg])对于保持老年人皮肤的完整性和护理质量至关重要。然而,不同擦拭压力对皮肤屏障多日恢复的影响仍不清楚。这项研究评估并比较了用弱压和普通压力连续进行床上擦浴对住院老年人皮肤屏障恢复的影响。方法这项人内随机对照试验涉及 254 个前臂(127 名患者),在一家综合医院进行。对前臂进行盲法试验,并随机分配两次床上擦浴的部位和顺序:弱压(10≤WP<20)和普通压力(20≤WP<30)擦拭三次,每天一次,连续两天。每天根据干预前和干预后 15 分钟的经表皮失水(TEWL)和角质层水合作用(SCH)评估皮肤屏障。结果线性混合模型显示,不同组间的经表皮失水率(TEWL)和角质层水合作用(SCH)的时间进程存在显著差异。第一天普通压力导致的皮肤屏障功能受损在第二天并没有恢复到基线值,而弱压力则没有引起显著变化。结论尽管老年人的皮肤屏障恢复能力下降,但我们的研究结果表明弱压是安全的,并强调了在床上洗澡时使用 WP 的重要性。试验注册UMIN000048838。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of tissue viability
Journal of tissue viability DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management. The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.
期刊最新文献
Nurses’ adherence, barriers, and facilitators to evidence-based pressure injury prevention practice in pediatric critical care units: A cross-sectional study Analysis on the current status of foot self - management and influencing factors of high - risk diabetic foot patients based on COM-B model Effectiveness of topical oils used in the prevention of pressure injury incidence and development among patients: a scoping review Machine learning methods to evaluate fluctuation in oxygenation and peripheral tissue temperature, in sacral and trochanteric area under pressure in healthy subjects and institutionalized patients. A prospective non-randomized trial Pediatric vascular access secured with tissue adhesive: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1