Lei Jiang, Li Chen, Hua Yu, Morten Kristensen, A. Gisolf, H. Dumont
{"title":"Detectable Radius of Investigation for One Flow Period with Bourdet Derivative","authors":"Lei Jiang, Li Chen, Hua Yu, Morten Kristensen, A. Gisolf, H. Dumont","doi":"10.2118/210150-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A new definition of the radius of investigation (ROI) is proposed to overcome the ambiguity present in the results from conventional ROI quantification methods. The term ROI is commonly used to quantify the minimum reservoir size or the distance to a potential boundary evaluated through pressure transient testing. However, the various methods available in the literature to quantify ROI often provide different answers stemming from varying assumptions and thus often lead to confusion in terms of the appropriate definition to choose. Although the ROI method developed by Van Poolen is well recognized in the industry, there is still debate about its general applicability because it is limited to a constant-rate flow period and is insensitive to flow rate, flow sequence, gauge resolution, and measurement noise level. This contrasts with operational experience, where a higher flow rate, higher gauge precision, and lower level of measurement noise lead to higher quality pressure transient testing data from which reservoir boundaries, or other features, can be identified farther away from the wellbore. In other words, higher flow rates, better gauges, and lower noise levels can lead to a larger achievable ROI.\n We propose a new definition of ROI, which is the detectable ROI for each drawdown or buildup flow period. The detectable ROI is derived from the actual pressure derivative response and not from a generic model assumption. By defining a derivative noise envelope, the new method clearly identifies the time when the derivative deviates from an unbounded model due to the presence of a boundary and thus provides an estimate of the detectable ROI for the analyzed period.\n This method overcomes the limitations of most conventional methods and provides ROI predictions that depend on flow rate and gauge noise while maintaining a consistent result with the current pressure transient interpretation. While detectable ROI is applicable for general drawdown/buildup pressure transient tests, the concept was developed with deep transient testing (DTT) in mind.","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210150-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A new definition of the radius of investigation (ROI) is proposed to overcome the ambiguity present in the results from conventional ROI quantification methods. The term ROI is commonly used to quantify the minimum reservoir size or the distance to a potential boundary evaluated through pressure transient testing. However, the various methods available in the literature to quantify ROI often provide different answers stemming from varying assumptions and thus often lead to confusion in terms of the appropriate definition to choose. Although the ROI method developed by Van Poolen is well recognized in the industry, there is still debate about its general applicability because it is limited to a constant-rate flow period and is insensitive to flow rate, flow sequence, gauge resolution, and measurement noise level. This contrasts with operational experience, where a higher flow rate, higher gauge precision, and lower level of measurement noise lead to higher quality pressure transient testing data from which reservoir boundaries, or other features, can be identified farther away from the wellbore. In other words, higher flow rates, better gauges, and lower noise levels can lead to a larger achievable ROI.
We propose a new definition of ROI, which is the detectable ROI for each drawdown or buildup flow period. The detectable ROI is derived from the actual pressure derivative response and not from a generic model assumption. By defining a derivative noise envelope, the new method clearly identifies the time when the derivative deviates from an unbounded model due to the presence of a boundary and thus provides an estimate of the detectable ROI for the analyzed period.
This method overcomes the limitations of most conventional methods and provides ROI predictions that depend on flow rate and gauge noise while maintaining a consistent result with the current pressure transient interpretation. While detectable ROI is applicable for general drawdown/buildup pressure transient tests, the concept was developed with deep transient testing (DTT) in mind.
提出了勘探半径(ROI)的新定义,以克服传统 ROI 量化方法结果中存在的模糊性。术语 ROI 通常用于量化最小储层尺寸或通过压力瞬态测试评估的潜在边界的距离。然而,文献中用于量化投资回报率的各种方法往往因假设条件的不同而给出不同的答案,因此常常导致在选择适当定义方面的混乱。尽管 Van Poolen 开发的投资回报率方法在业内广受认可,但由于该方法仅限于恒定流速时段,且对流速、流动顺序、压力表分辨率和测量噪音水平不敏感,因此其普遍适用性仍存在争议。这与实际操作经验形成了鲜明对比,在实际操作中,较高的流速、较高的压力表精度和较低的测量噪音水平会带来更高质量的压力瞬态测试数据,从而可以在距离井筒较远的地方识别储层边界或其他特征。换句话说,更高的流速、更好的压力表和更低的噪音水平可以带来更大的可实现投资回报率。我们提出了一个新的 ROI 定义,即每个缩减或增大流量期间的可探测 ROI。可探测 ROI 来自实际压力导数响应,而非通用模型假设。通过定义导数噪声包络线,新方法可以清楚地识别出导数因边界的存在而偏离无边界模型的时间,从而为分析时段提供可探测 ROI 的估计值。这种方法克服了大多数传统方法的局限性,可提供取决于流速和压力表噪声的 ROI 预测,同时与当前的压力瞬态解释结果保持一致。虽然可探测 ROI 适用于一般的缩减/增大压力瞬态测试,但这一概念是针对深层瞬态测试 (DTT) 而开发的。
期刊介绍:
Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.