Oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive segmentectomy or lobectomy in patients with hypermetabolic clinical stage IA1-2 non–small cell lung cancer

{"title":"Oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive segmentectomy or lobectomy in patients with hypermetabolic clinical stage IA1-2 non–small cell lung cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the oncologic outcome of patients with hypermetabolic tumors resected by segmentectomy or lobectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with peripheral clinical stage IA1-2 non–small cell lung cancer (January 2017-June 2023) who underwent resection by segmentectomy or lobectomy in a single center. A hypermetabolic tumor was defined as a tumor with a positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value &gt;2.5. Propensity score case-matching analysis was used to generate 2 balanced groups of patients with hypermetabolic tumors operated by segmentectomy or lobectomy. Four-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and cancer-specific survival were compared between the matched groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 164 segmentectomies and 234 lobectomies were analyzed. There were 91 (55%) hypermetabolic tumors in the segmentectomy group versus 178 in the lobectomy group (76%), <em>P</em> &lt; .001. The comparison of the matched groups with hypermetabolic tumors showed a better 4-year OS after lobectomy compared with segmentectomy (lobectomy 87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76-93; segmentectomy, 67%; 95% CI, 49-80; <em>P</em> = .029). The 4-year EFS appeared to have a better trend after lobectomy (77%; 95% CI, 65-85) compared with segmentectomy (58%; 95% CI, 39-72), <em>P</em> = .088. The 4-year cancer-specific survival, however, was similar between the matched groups (lobectomy, 95%; 95% CI, 86-98 vs segmentectomy, 94%; 95% CI, 78-99, <em>P</em> = .79).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Early-stage peripheral hypermetabolic tumors are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes compared with less PET-avid tumors. Despite poorer OS and EFS after segmentectomy likely caused by cancer-unrelated deaths, cancer-specific survival in this high-risk group was similar after lobectomy or segmentectomy. In well-selected patients, a high PET maximum standardized uptake value should not be considered a contraindication to segmentectomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 167-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001220/pdfft?md5=40682cf1a1bc1e6fc266fe416da171a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624001220-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the oncologic outcome of patients with hypermetabolic tumors resected by segmentectomy or lobectomy.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with peripheral clinical stage IA1-2 non–small cell lung cancer (January 2017-June 2023) who underwent resection by segmentectomy or lobectomy in a single center. A hypermetabolic tumor was defined as a tumor with a positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value >2.5. Propensity score case-matching analysis was used to generate 2 balanced groups of patients with hypermetabolic tumors operated by segmentectomy or lobectomy. Four-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and cancer-specific survival were compared between the matched groups.

Results

A total of 164 segmentectomies and 234 lobectomies were analyzed. There were 91 (55%) hypermetabolic tumors in the segmentectomy group versus 178 in the lobectomy group (76%), P < .001. The comparison of the matched groups with hypermetabolic tumors showed a better 4-year OS after lobectomy compared with segmentectomy (lobectomy 87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76-93; segmentectomy, 67%; 95% CI, 49-80; P = .029). The 4-year EFS appeared to have a better trend after lobectomy (77%; 95% CI, 65-85) compared with segmentectomy (58%; 95% CI, 39-72), P = .088. The 4-year cancer-specific survival, however, was similar between the matched groups (lobectomy, 95%; 95% CI, 86-98 vs segmentectomy, 94%; 95% CI, 78-99, P = .79).

Conclusions

Early-stage peripheral hypermetabolic tumors are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes compared with less PET-avid tumors. Despite poorer OS and EFS after segmentectomy likely caused by cancer-unrelated deaths, cancer-specific survival in this high-risk group was similar after lobectomy or segmentectomy. In well-selected patients, a high PET maximum standardized uptake value should not be considered a contraindication to segmentectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高代谢临床IA1-2期非小细胞肺癌患者微创肺段切除术或肺叶切除术后的肿瘤治疗效果
方法这是一项回顾性分析,对象是在一个中心接受分段切除术或肺叶切除术的所有外周临床IA1-2期非小细胞肺癌连续患者(2017年1月至2023年6月)。高代谢肿瘤被定义为正电子发射断层扫描(PET)最大标准化摄取值为>2.5的肿瘤。通过倾向评分病例匹配分析,产生了两组均衡的高代谢肿瘤患者,他们分别接受了分段切除术或肺叶切除术。对匹配组的四年总生存率(OS)、无事件生存率(EFS)和癌症特异性生存率进行了比较。分段切除组中有 91 例(55%)高代谢肿瘤,而肺叶切除组中有 178 例(76%),P <.001。高代谢肿瘤配对组的比较显示,与分段切除术相比,肺叶切除术后的4年OS更好(肺叶切除术87%;95%置信区间[CI],76-93;分段切除术67%;95% CI,49-80;P = .029)。与分段切除术(58%;95% CI,39-72)相比,肺叶切除术(77%;95% CI,65-85)后的 4 年 EFS 似乎有更好的趋势,P = .088。结论早期外周高代谢肿瘤与PETavid较低的肿瘤相比,其肿瘤学预后较差。尽管分段切除术后的OS和EFS较差,这可能是由于与癌症无关的死亡造成的,但这一高危人群在肺叶切除术或分段切除术后的癌症特异性生存率相似。在经过严格筛选的患者中,PET最大标准化摄取值较高不应被视为分段切除术的禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repair of acute type A aortic dissection: The simplest solution is not always the best Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support? Type B aortic dissection in Marfan patients after the David procedure: Insights from patient-specific simulation Reoperation after aortic root replacement and its impact on long-term survival Should we wait until the morning?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1