Heart Rate Variability Modulation Through Slow-Paced Breathing in Health Care Workers with Long COVID: A Case-Control Study

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.05.021
Marcella Mauro MD, PhD, Luca Cegolon MD, PhD, Nicoletta Bestiaco MD, Elisa Zulian MD, Francesca Larese Filon MD
{"title":"Heart Rate Variability Modulation Through Slow-Paced Breathing in Health Care Workers with Long COVID: A Case-Control Study","authors":"Marcella Mauro MD, PhD,&nbsp;Luca Cegolon MD, PhD,&nbsp;Nicoletta Bestiaco MD,&nbsp;Elisa Zulian MD,&nbsp;Francesca Larese Filon MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Long COVID is a syndrome persisting 12+ weeks after COVID-19 infection, impacting life and work ability. Autonomic nervous system imbalance has been hypothesized as the cause. This study aims to investigate cardiovascular autonomic function in health care workers (HCWs) with Long COVID and the effectiveness of slow-paced breathing (SPB) on autonomic modulation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From December 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023, 6655 HCWs of the University Hospitals of Trieste (Northeast Italy) were asked to participate in the study by company-email. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed. Global health status and psychosomatic disorders were evaluated through validated questionnaires. Heart rate variability was assessed by finger-photoplethysmography during spontaneous breathing and SPB, which stimulate vagal response. Long COVID HCWs (G1) were contrasted with Never infected (G2) and Fully recovered COVID-19 workers (G3).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 126 HCWs evaluated. The 58 Long COVID were assessed at a median time because COVID-19 of 419.5 days (interquartile range 269-730) and had significantly more psychosomatic symptoms and lower detectability of spontaneous systolic pressure oscillation at 0.1 Hz (Mayer wave - baroreflex arc) during spontaneous breathing compared with 53 never-infected and 14 fully-recovered HCWs (19%, 42%, and 40%, respectively, <em>P</em> = .027). During SPB, the increase in this parameter was close to controls (91.2%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, <em>P</em> = .09). No other differences in heart rate variability parameters were found among groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Resting vascular modulation was reduced in Long COVID, while during SPB, baroreflex sensitivity effectively improved. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate whether multiple sessions of breathing exercises can restore basal vascular reactivity and reduce cardiovascular risk in these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":"138 5","pages":"Pages 870-883.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934324003395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Long COVID is a syndrome persisting 12+ weeks after COVID-19 infection, impacting life and work ability. Autonomic nervous system imbalance has been hypothesized as the cause. This study aims to investigate cardiovascular autonomic function in health care workers (HCWs) with Long COVID and the effectiveness of slow-paced breathing (SPB) on autonomic modulation.

Methods

From December 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023, 6655 HCWs of the University Hospitals of Trieste (Northeast Italy) were asked to participate in the study by company-email. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed. Global health status and psychosomatic disorders were evaluated through validated questionnaires. Heart rate variability was assessed by finger-photoplethysmography during spontaneous breathing and SPB, which stimulate vagal response. Long COVID HCWs (G1) were contrasted with Never infected (G2) and Fully recovered COVID-19 workers (G3).

Results

There were 126 HCWs evaluated. The 58 Long COVID were assessed at a median time because COVID-19 of 419.5 days (interquartile range 269-730) and had significantly more psychosomatic symptoms and lower detectability of spontaneous systolic pressure oscillation at 0.1 Hz (Mayer wave - baroreflex arc) during spontaneous breathing compared with 53 never-infected and 14 fully-recovered HCWs (19%, 42%, and 40%, respectively, P = .027). During SPB, the increase in this parameter was close to controls (91.2%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, P = .09). No other differences in heart rate variability parameters were found among groups.

Conclusions

Resting vascular modulation was reduced in Long COVID, while during SPB, baroreflex sensitivity effectively improved. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate whether multiple sessions of breathing exercises can restore basal vascular reactivity and reduce cardiovascular risk in these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过慢节奏呼吸调节长 COVID 医护人员的心率变异性:一项病例对照研究
长期COVID是指COVID-19感染后持续12周以上的综合征,影响生活和工作能力。自主神经系统失衡被认为是病因。本研究旨在探讨长冠肺炎医护人员心血管自主功能及慢节奏呼吸(SPB)对自主调节的影响。方法从2022年12月1日至2023年3月31日,意大利东北部的里雅斯特大学医院6655名医护人员通过公司邮件参与研究。评估纳入/排除标准。通过有效的问卷评估全球健康状况和心身疾病。在自发呼吸和刺激迷走神经反应的SPB期间,通过手指光容积脉搏波来评估心率变异性。长期COVID-19工人(G1)与未感染(G2)和完全康复的COVID-19工人(G3)进行对比。结果共评价126例HCWs。与53名未感染和14名完全康复的HCWs(分别为19%、42%和40%,P = 0.027)相比,58名长COVID患者的中位时间进行了评估,因为COVID-19为419.5天(四分位数范围为269-730),并且在自主呼吸期间具有明显更多的心身症状和较低的0.1 Hz (Mayer波-气压反射弧)自发性收缩压振荡检出率(分别为19%、42%和40%)。SPB期间,该参数的增加接近对照组(分别为91.2%、100%和100%,P = 0.09)。各组之间在心率变异性参数方面没有发现其他差异。结论长冠肺炎患者静息期血管调节功能减弱,SPB期血管反射敏感性有效提高。需要长期研究来评估多次呼吸练习是否可以恢复这些患者的基础血管反应性并降低心血管风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
期刊最新文献
Ophthalmic safety considerations when initiating GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with diabetic retinopathy. The Reply. Serial six-minute walk testing in heart failure: Methodological strengths and future directions. The reply. Sexually transmissible Campylobacter in men who have sex with men.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1