Ad Libitum Drinking Prevents Body Mass Loss Across Consecutive Workdays in Heat

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY Physiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1152/physiol.2024.39.s1.914
Alexander Rawlings, Michael Kozlin, Johnathan Przybysz, Lora Cavuoto, Zachary Schlader, Riana Pryor
{"title":"Ad Libitum Drinking Prevents Body Mass Loss Across Consecutive Workdays in Heat","authors":"Alexander Rawlings, Michael Kozlin, Johnathan Przybysz, Lora Cavuoto, Zachary Schlader, Riana Pryor","doi":"10.1152/physiol.2024.39.s1.914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydration practices across consecutive days of heavy-intensity work in heat when fluid is freely available is unknown. Without this information it remains unknown whether hydration modifies heat strain under hot working conditions and whether worker recommendations adequately maintain hydration status. We hypothesized that participants would maintain hydration status including daily percent change in body mass across workdays. Fifteen healthy, unacclimated participants (7 Females, Age: 27±6 y, Body mass: 75.0±14.4 kg, Body fat: 26.6±5.8%) completed three consecutive days (Day 1, Day 2, Day 3) of 4 h of 395±10 W work to a work/rest cycle of 45/15 min in a 36.3±0.8°C, 21±5% relative humidity environment. Participants were offered 237 mL of a sport drink every 20 min to consume ad libitum. Urine flow rate (UFR) was measured before work. Urine specific gravity (USG) and nude body mass were measured before and after work. Thirst and fluid consumption were measured throughout work. USG before work was not different between Day 1 (1.013±0.010) and Day 2 (1.013±0.010, p=0.822), but was greater before work on Day 3 (1.015±0.010, p=0.046) compared to Day 2. Change in USG from before to after work was not different between Day 1 (+0.003±0.008) and Day 2 (+0.000±0.006, p=0.123), but was lower on Day 3 (-0.002±0.006, p=0.021) compared to Day 1, with no difference between Day 2 and Day 3 (p=0.058). Before work body mass was not different across days (p=0.103). Daily percent change in body mass was not different across days (p=0.366, Day 1: 0.53±1.11%, Day 2: 0.18±0.95%, Day 3: 0.18±0.81%), indicating weight gain each day. Sweat rate (p=0.790) and UFR (p=0.469) were not different among days. Participants consumed 77±18% (Day 1), 82±19% (Day 2), and 82±16% (Day 3) of fluid offered (p=0.401), equaling 31±10 mL/kg (Day 1), 33±11 mL/kg (Day 2), 33±10 mL/kg (Day 3) (p=0.370). Maximum thirst was greater on Day 1 (3.5±1.1) compared to Day 3 (2.9±1.0, p=0.045) with no difference between Day 1 and Day 2 (3.4±1.4, p=0.648) or between Day 2 and Day 3 (p=0.121). This study demonstrates consistent hydration practices and no differences in hydration status across three consecutive days of high-intensity work in heat when fluid is freely available. Under these conditions, workers can consume fluids ad libitum and worker recommendations for hydration during heat stress should be revisited. This project was funded my the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1K01OH012016-01A1). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.","PeriodicalId":49694,"journal":{"name":"Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2024.39.s1.914","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydration practices across consecutive days of heavy-intensity work in heat when fluid is freely available is unknown. Without this information it remains unknown whether hydration modifies heat strain under hot working conditions and whether worker recommendations adequately maintain hydration status. We hypothesized that participants would maintain hydration status including daily percent change in body mass across workdays. Fifteen healthy, unacclimated participants (7 Females, Age: 27±6 y, Body mass: 75.0±14.4 kg, Body fat: 26.6±5.8%) completed three consecutive days (Day 1, Day 2, Day 3) of 4 h of 395±10 W work to a work/rest cycle of 45/15 min in a 36.3±0.8°C, 21±5% relative humidity environment. Participants were offered 237 mL of a sport drink every 20 min to consume ad libitum. Urine flow rate (UFR) was measured before work. Urine specific gravity (USG) and nude body mass were measured before and after work. Thirst and fluid consumption were measured throughout work. USG before work was not different between Day 1 (1.013±0.010) and Day 2 (1.013±0.010, p=0.822), but was greater before work on Day 3 (1.015±0.010, p=0.046) compared to Day 2. Change in USG from before to after work was not different between Day 1 (+0.003±0.008) and Day 2 (+0.000±0.006, p=0.123), but was lower on Day 3 (-0.002±0.006, p=0.021) compared to Day 1, with no difference between Day 2 and Day 3 (p=0.058). Before work body mass was not different across days (p=0.103). Daily percent change in body mass was not different across days (p=0.366, Day 1: 0.53±1.11%, Day 2: 0.18±0.95%, Day 3: 0.18±0.81%), indicating weight gain each day. Sweat rate (p=0.790) and UFR (p=0.469) were not different among days. Participants consumed 77±18% (Day 1), 82±19% (Day 2), and 82±16% (Day 3) of fluid offered (p=0.401), equaling 31±10 mL/kg (Day 1), 33±11 mL/kg (Day 2), 33±10 mL/kg (Day 3) (p=0.370). Maximum thirst was greater on Day 1 (3.5±1.1) compared to Day 3 (2.9±1.0, p=0.045) with no difference between Day 1 and Day 2 (3.4±1.4, p=0.648) or between Day 2 and Day 3 (p=0.121). This study demonstrates consistent hydration practices and no differences in hydration status across three consecutive days of high-intensity work in heat when fluid is freely available. Under these conditions, workers can consume fluids ad libitum and worker recommendations for hydration during heat stress should be revisited. This project was funded my the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1K01OH012016-01A1). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
畅饮可防止连续高温工作日的体重下降
在可以自由获得液体的情况下,连续几天在高温下高强度工作时的水合情况尚不清楚。如果没有这方面的信息,那么在高温工作条件下,水合是否会减轻热负荷,以及工人的建议是否能充分保持水合状态,这些都还是未知数。我们假设参与者将保持水合状态,包括在整个工作日中身体质量的每日百分比变化。15 名未适应高温环境的健康参与者(7 名女性,年龄:27±6 岁,体重:75.0±14.4 千克,体脂:26.6±5.8%)在 36.3±0.8°C、21±5% 相对湿度的环境中连续三天(第 1 天、第 2 天、第 3 天)完成了 4 小时 395±10 W 的工作,工作/休息周期为 45/15 分钟。参与者每 20 分钟可自由饮用 237 毫升运动饮料。工作前测量尿流率(UFR)。工作前后测量尿比重(USG)和裸体重。在整个工作过程中测量口渴程度和液体消耗量。第 1 天(1.013±0.010)和第 2 天(1.013±0.010,p=0.822)工作前的 USG 没有差异,但第 3 天(1.015±0.010,p=0.046)工作前的 USG 比第 2 天大。工作前和工作后的 USG 变化在第 1 天(+0.003±0.008)和第 2 天(+0.000±0.006,p=0.123)之间没有差异,但第 3 天(-0.002±0.006,p=0.021)比第 1 天低,第 2 天和第 3 天之间没有差异(p=0.058)。工作前的体重在各天之间没有差异(p=0.103)。身体质量的日变化百分比在各天之间没有差异(p=0.366,第 1 天:0.53±1.11%;第 2 天:0.18±0.95%;第 3 天:0.18±0.81%),表明体重每天都在增加。各天的出汗率(p=0.790)和UFR(p=0.469)没有差异。参与者消耗了所提供液体的 77±18%(第 1 天)、82±19%(第 2 天)和 82±16%(第 3 天)(p=0.401),相当于 31±10 mL/kg(第 1 天)、33±11 mL/kg(第 2 天)和 33±10 mL/kg(第 3 天)(p=0.370)。与第 3 天(2.9±1.0,p=0.045)相比,第 1 天(3.5±1.1)的最大口渴量更大,第 1 天和第 2 天(3.4±1.4,p=0.648)或第 2 天和第 3 天(p=0.121)之间无差异。这项研究表明,在可以自由获得液体的情况下,连续三天在高温下高强度工作的工人在水合状况上保持一致,没有差异。在这些条件下,工人可以自由饮用液体,因此应重新考虑工人在热应激期间的水合建议。该项目由美国国家职业安全与健康研究所资助(1K01OH012016-01A1)。本文是在 2024 年美国生理学峰会上发表的摘要全文,仅提供 HTML 格式。本摘要没有附加版本或附加内容。生理学》未参与同行评审过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology
Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Physiology journal features meticulously crafted review articles penned by esteemed leaders in their respective fields. These articles undergo rigorous peer review and showcase the forefront of cutting-edge advances across various domains of physiology. Our Editorial Board, comprised of distinguished leaders in the broad spectrum of physiology, convenes annually to deliberate and recommend pioneering topics for review articles, as well as select the most suitable scientists to author these articles. Join us in exploring the forefront of physiological research and innovation.
期刊最新文献
Olfactory Development and Dysfunction - Involvement of Microglia. SUMO regulation of ion channels in health and disease. Physiology in Perspective. The Promise of a Pointillist Perspective for Comparative Immunology. Extrarenal Benefits of SGLT2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Cardiomyopathies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1