BlockCompass: A Benchmarking Platform for Blockchain Performance

IF 3.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE IEEE Transactions on Computers Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1109/TC.2024.3404103
Mohammadreza Rasolroveicy;Wejdene Haouari;Marios Fokaefs
{"title":"BlockCompass: A Benchmarking Platform for Blockchain Performance","authors":"Mohammadreza Rasolroveicy;Wejdene Haouari;Marios Fokaefs","doi":"10.1109/TC.2024.3404103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchain technology has gained momentum due to its immutability and transparency. Several blockchain platforms, each with different consensus protocols, have been proposed. However, choosing and configuring such a platform is a non-trivial task. Numerous benchmarking tools have been introduced to test the performance of blockchain solutions. Yet, these tools are often limited to specific blockchain platforms or require complex configurations. Moreover, they tend to focus on one-off batch evaluation models, which may not be ideal for longer-running instances under continuous workloads. In this work, we present \n<italic>BlockCompass</i>\n, an all-inclusive blockchain benchmarking tool that can be easily configured and extended. We demonstrate how \n<italic>BlockCompass</i>\n can evaluate the performance of various blockchain platforms and configurations, including Ethereum Proof-of-Authority, Ethereum Proof-of-Work, Hyperledger Fabric Raft, Hyperledger Sawtooth with Proof-of-Elapsed-Time, Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance, and Raft consensus algorithms, against workloads that continuously fluctuate over time. We show how continuous transactional workloads may be more appropriate than batch workloads in capturing certain stressful events for the system. Finally, we present the results of a usability study about the convenience and effectiveness offered by \n<italic>BlockCompass</i>\n in blockchain benchmarking.","PeriodicalId":13087,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Computers","volume":"73 8","pages":"2111-2122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Computers","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10536880/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blockchain technology has gained momentum due to its immutability and transparency. Several blockchain platforms, each with different consensus protocols, have been proposed. However, choosing and configuring such a platform is a non-trivial task. Numerous benchmarking tools have been introduced to test the performance of blockchain solutions. Yet, these tools are often limited to specific blockchain platforms or require complex configurations. Moreover, they tend to focus on one-off batch evaluation models, which may not be ideal for longer-running instances under continuous workloads. In this work, we present BlockCompass , an all-inclusive blockchain benchmarking tool that can be easily configured and extended. We demonstrate how BlockCompass can evaluate the performance of various blockchain platforms and configurations, including Ethereum Proof-of-Authority, Ethereum Proof-of-Work, Hyperledger Fabric Raft, Hyperledger Sawtooth with Proof-of-Elapsed-Time, Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance, and Raft consensus algorithms, against workloads that continuously fluctuate over time. We show how continuous transactional workloads may be more appropriate than batch workloads in capturing certain stressful events for the system. Finally, we present the results of a usability study about the convenience and effectiveness offered by BlockCompass in blockchain benchmarking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BlockCompass:区块链性能基准平台
区块链技术因其不可篡改性和透明度而获得了强劲的发展势头。目前已提出了多个区块链平台,每个平台都有不同的共识协议。然而,选择和配置这样一个平台并非易事。为了测试区块链解决方案的性能,已经推出了许多基准测试工具。然而,这些工具往往局限于特定的区块链平台,或者需要复杂的配置。此外,这些工具往往侧重于一次性批量评估模型,对于在连续工作负载下长期运行的实例可能并不理想。在这项工作中,我们介绍了 BlockCompass,这是一种可以轻松配置和扩展的包罗万象的区块链基准测试工具。我们展示了 BlockCompass 如何针对随时间持续波动的工作负载,评估各种区块链平台和配置的性能,包括以太坊授权证明、以太坊工作证明、Hyperledger Fabric Raft、Hyperledger Sawtooth 与过期时间证明、实用拜占庭容错和 Raft 共识算法。我们展示了连续事务性工作负载如何比批量工作负载更适合捕捉系统的某些压力事件。最后,我们介绍了有关 BlockCompass 在区块链基准测试中提供的便利性和有效性的可用性研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Computers
IEEE Transactions on Computers 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Computers is a monthly publication with a wide distribution to researchers, developers, technical managers, and educators in the computer field. It publishes papers on research in areas of current interest to the readers. These areas include, but are not limited to, the following: a) computer organizations and architectures; b) operating systems, software systems, and communication protocols; c) real-time systems and embedded systems; d) digital devices, computer components, and interconnection networks; e) specification, design, prototyping, and testing methods and tools; f) performance, fault tolerance, reliability, security, and testability; g) case studies and experimental and theoretical evaluations; and h) new and important applications and trends.
期刊最新文献
CUSPX: Efficient GPU Implementations of Post-Quantum Signature SPHINCS+ Chiplet-Gym: Optimizing Chiplet-based AI Accelerator Design with Reinforcement Learning FLALM: A Flexible Low Area-Latency Montgomery Modular Multiplication on FPGA Novel Lagrange Multipliers-Driven Adaptive Offloading for Vehicular Edge Computing Leveraging GPU in Homomorphic Encryption: Framework Design and Analysis of BFV Variants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1