Wayuu people's positions regarding the acceptability of political amnesties in Colombia

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Conflict Resolution Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1002/crq.21431
Yamile Turizo- Palencia, Claudia Pineda-Marín, Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre, Etienne Mullet
{"title":"Wayuu people's positions regarding the acceptability of political amnesties in Colombia","authors":"Yamile Turizo- Palencia,&nbsp;Claudia Pineda-Marín,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre,&nbsp;Etienne Mullet","doi":"10.1002/crq.21431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study mapped the diverse personal positions of the Wayuu indigenous community in Colombia regarding the acceptability of political amnesties in a post-conflict context. The sample was composed of 130 indigenous adults between 18 and 74 years of age residing in the Guajira region, who were shown 12 amnesty-related scenarios. These scenarios were composed according to a three-factor design: (a) the level of detail that the amnesty applicant (former combatant of some illegal armed group in Colombia) was willing to disclose, (b) whether or not the applicant asked for forgiveness, and (c) the severity of the punishment endured by the amnesty applicant (A cluster analysis yielded three qualitatively different positions: never acceptable (18%), almost always acceptable (9%) and depends jointly on the quality of the information and remorse (73%). For the vast majority of Wayuu community members, a political amnesty for a former combatant of a Colombian armed group is not acceptable. For those who have accepted it, amnesty is only possible if the applicant proves that he or she is not causing harm to third parties. And it would also be conditioned to the particular situation of each case. A collective amnesty process has no chance of being considered acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":39736,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crq.21431","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crq.21431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study mapped the diverse personal positions of the Wayuu indigenous community in Colombia regarding the acceptability of political amnesties in a post-conflict context. The sample was composed of 130 indigenous adults between 18 and 74 years of age residing in the Guajira region, who were shown 12 amnesty-related scenarios. These scenarios were composed according to a three-factor design: (a) the level of detail that the amnesty applicant (former combatant of some illegal armed group in Colombia) was willing to disclose, (b) whether or not the applicant asked for forgiveness, and (c) the severity of the punishment endured by the amnesty applicant (A cluster analysis yielded three qualitatively different positions: never acceptable (18%), almost always acceptable (9%) and depends jointly on the quality of the information and remorse (73%). For the vast majority of Wayuu community members, a political amnesty for a former combatant of a Colombian armed group is not acceptable. For those who have accepted it, amnesty is only possible if the applicant proves that he or she is not causing harm to third parties. And it would also be conditioned to the particular situation of each case. A collective amnesty process has no chance of being considered acceptable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瓦尤人对哥伦比亚政治大赦可接受性的立场
本研究描绘了哥伦比亚瓦尤土著社区在冲突后背景下对政治大赦的可接受性所持的不同个人立场。样本由居住在瓜希拉地区的 130 名年龄在 18 岁至 74 岁之间的土著成年人组成,向他们展示了 12 种与大赦有关的情景。这些情景是根据三个因素设计的:(a) 特赦申请人(哥伦比亚某个非法武装组织的前战斗人员)愿意披露的详细程度,(b) 申请人是否请求宽恕,以及 (c) 特赦申请人所受惩罚的严重程度(聚类分析得出了三种不同的定性立场:从不接受(18%)、几乎总是接受(9%)以及取决于信息质量和悔恨(73%)。对绝大多数瓦尤社区成员来说,哥伦比亚武装团体前战斗人员的政治特赦是不可接受的。对于那些接受特赦的人来说,只有在申请人证明自己没有对第三方造成伤害的情况下,才有可能获得特赦。而且,大赦还要根据每个案件的具体情况而定。集体大赦程序不可能被认为是可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Conflict Resolution Quarterly Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes quality scholarship on relationships between theory, research, and practice in the conflict management and dispute resolution field to promote more effective professional applications. A defining focus of the journal is the relationships among theory, research, and practice. Articles address the implications of theory for practice and research directions, how research can better inform practice, and how research can contribute to theory development with important implications for practice. Articles also focus on all aspects of the conflict resolution process and context with primary focus on the behavior, role, and impact of third parties in effectively handling conflict.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Promoting radical empathy: Changes in empathy and perspective taking at a youth summer camp that centers restorative practices An incoherent state‐identity approach to African regional disorder Quitting silently: A longitudinal research on the impact of workplace conflict and nonviolent work behavior Conflict and communication in everyday life: An exploration of intercommunity conflict in Assam, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1