Gender Inequity in Clinical Clerkships and its Influence on Career Selection: A Cross-Sectional Survey

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1177/23821205241257401
Muhammad Hamza Dawood, Mavra Roshan, Muhammad Daniyal, Sheza Sohail, Haseefa Perveen, Umair Ul Islam
{"title":"Gender Inequity in Clinical Clerkships and its Influence on Career Selection: A Cross-Sectional Survey","authors":"Muhammad Hamza Dawood, Mavra Roshan, Muhammad Daniyal, Sheza Sohail, Haseefa Perveen, Umair Ul Islam","doi":"10.1177/23821205241257401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify the frequency, form, and underlying factors contributing to gender inequity experienced by medical undergraduates and assess its influence on their career choices.MethodThis was a cross-sectional, retrospective survey with a 100% response rate. This survey was distributed among medical students of clinical years in Karachi's private and government medical colleges from September 10<jats:sup>th</jats:sup>, 2021-March 30th, 2022. 430 participants were enrolled using a simple-random-sampling-technique. Chi-square/Fisher's Exact tests are employed to assess the relationships between gender and gender-based inequity in various specialties, including their characteristics, influence on career choices, adverse psychological effects, and potential mitigation strategies.ResultsAmong 430 respondents, 28.6% were male, and 71.4% were female. 89.1% reported gender inequity, evenly distributed in government (80.4%) and private institutions (88.1%). The general surgery and gynecology disciplines stood out, each with a 56% prevalence. In gynecology and surgery clinical-clerkships, both genders experienced similar rates, with females at 54.5% and 42.3%, and males at 56.7% and 61.6%, respectively (P-value = .000*). Disrespect from staff/professors/patients (48.8%) was the most common manifestation, driven by factors like preferences (73.7%), gender superiority (62.6%), societal attitudes (54%), and cultural norms (50.9%). Furthermore, 82.6% of students reported that gender inequity had a negative impact on their career decision (Male = 82.9%;Female = 82.4%, P-value = .899). Additionally, gender inequity also caused demotivation (78.1%), poor self-esteem (67.2%), helplessness/hopelessness (48.6%), and frustration (45.8%).ConclusionsGender inequity is widely prevalent in the clinical-clerkships, affecting medical students’ career decisions and mental health, stressing the need to prioritize and implement solutions at the undergraduate clinical-clerkship level.","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241257401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify the frequency, form, and underlying factors contributing to gender inequity experienced by medical undergraduates and assess its influence on their career choices.MethodThis was a cross-sectional, retrospective survey with a 100% response rate. This survey was distributed among medical students of clinical years in Karachi's private and government medical colleges from September 10th, 2021-March 30th, 2022. 430 participants were enrolled using a simple-random-sampling-technique. Chi-square/Fisher's Exact tests are employed to assess the relationships between gender and gender-based inequity in various specialties, including their characteristics, influence on career choices, adverse psychological effects, and potential mitigation strategies.ResultsAmong 430 respondents, 28.6% were male, and 71.4% were female. 89.1% reported gender inequity, evenly distributed in government (80.4%) and private institutions (88.1%). The general surgery and gynecology disciplines stood out, each with a 56% prevalence. In gynecology and surgery clinical-clerkships, both genders experienced similar rates, with females at 54.5% and 42.3%, and males at 56.7% and 61.6%, respectively (P-value = .000*). Disrespect from staff/professors/patients (48.8%) was the most common manifestation, driven by factors like preferences (73.7%), gender superiority (62.6%), societal attitudes (54%), and cultural norms (50.9%). Furthermore, 82.6% of students reported that gender inequity had a negative impact on their career decision (Male = 82.9%;Female = 82.4%, P-value = .899). Additionally, gender inequity also caused demotivation (78.1%), poor self-esteem (67.2%), helplessness/hopelessness (48.6%), and frustration (45.8%).ConclusionsGender inequity is widely prevalent in the clinical-clerkships, affecting medical students’ career decisions and mental health, stressing the need to prioritize and implement solutions at the undergraduate clinical-clerkship level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床实习中的性别不平等及其对职业选择的影响:横断面调查
本研究旨在确定医学本科生所经历的性别不平等的频率、形式和潜在因素,并评估其对学生职业选择的影响。该调查于 2021 年 9 月 10 日至 2022 年 3 月 30 日期间在卡拉奇私立和公立医学院临床年级的医学生中进行。采用简单随机抽样技术,共招募了 430 名参与者。采用Chi-square/Fisher's Exact检验来评估不同专业中性别与基于性别的不平等之间的关系,包括其特征、对职业选择的影响、不良心理影响以及潜在的缓解策略。89.1%的受访者表示存在性别不平等现象,平均分布在政府机构(80.4%)和私立机构(88.1%)。普通外科和妇科的性别不平等现象尤为突出,各占 56%。在妇科和外科临床实习中,男女生的比例相似,女性分别为 54.5%和 42.3%,男性分别为 56.7%和 61.6%(P 值 = 0.000*)。受偏好(73.7%)、性别优越感(62.6%)、社会态度(54%)和文化规范(50.9%)等因素影响,教职员工/教授/患者的不尊重(48.8%)是最常见的表现形式。此外,82.6% 的学生表示性别不平等对他们的职业决定产生了负面影响(男生 = 82.9%;女生 = 82.4%,P 值 = 0.899)。结论性别不平等在临床实习中普遍存在,影响了医学生的职业决定和心理健康,强调有必要在本科临床实习阶段优先考虑并实施解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Engagement in Extracurricular Activities During Medical School: A Cross-Sectional Study on Student Motivations and Challenges. The State of Academic Bullying Among Medical Students in Tanzania: Prevalence, Forms and Associated Factors. A Cross-Sectional Study. Student Critical Self-Reflection and Perceptions of Video-Based Pro-Section Computer-Assisted Instruction. Does Medical Education Require Radical Change? The Role of Information Visualisation and Anecdotal Evidence in Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1