{"title":"Where is the patriarchy?: A review and research agenda for the concept of patriarchy in management and organization studies","authors":"Nicole Ferry","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper I analyze 30 years of research on patriarchy in top management and organization studies (MOS) journals, and I map out an agenda for (re)igniting patriarchy as both a topic of study and lens for viewing key MOS issues in a new light. I organize my review (175 articles) around three themes: intersections, subjects, and contexts. By <i>intersections</i> I refer to the nuanced ways that scholars define patriarchy, adopting interdisciplinary and intersectional perspectives to understand the diversity of women's experiences under patriarchal domination. By <i>subjects</i> I refer to the primary focus on women's experiences, and on the ways that women's subjectivities are socially constituted and negotiated within patriarchal discourses of work and organizational life. By <i>contexts</i> I refer to the sites where MOS research has investigated patriarchy, as well as the ways this research has framed patriarchy itself as a context. Based on this thematic review, I outline a future research agenda to further refine the concept in MOS in three key ways. I call for increased research approaches that center the structural/political forces of patriarchy and gender, increased focus on the experiences of men as agents and subjects of patriarchal domination, and increased attention on patriarchy in Western contexts to redress the overrepresentation of research on patriarchy in the Global South. I conclude that patriarchy is an important line of inquiry for MOS, and that further attention to the concept would enable MOS research to contribute more fully to contemporary debates on gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"32 1","pages":"302-329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.13145","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper I analyze 30 years of research on patriarchy in top management and organization studies (MOS) journals, and I map out an agenda for (re)igniting patriarchy as both a topic of study and lens for viewing key MOS issues in a new light. I organize my review (175 articles) around three themes: intersections, subjects, and contexts. By intersections I refer to the nuanced ways that scholars define patriarchy, adopting interdisciplinary and intersectional perspectives to understand the diversity of women's experiences under patriarchal domination. By subjects I refer to the primary focus on women's experiences, and on the ways that women's subjectivities are socially constituted and negotiated within patriarchal discourses of work and organizational life. By contexts I refer to the sites where MOS research has investigated patriarchy, as well as the ways this research has framed patriarchy itself as a context. Based on this thematic review, I outline a future research agenda to further refine the concept in MOS in three key ways. I call for increased research approaches that center the structural/political forces of patriarchy and gender, increased focus on the experiences of men as agents and subjects of patriarchal domination, and increased attention on patriarchy in Western contexts to redress the overrepresentation of research on patriarchy in the Global South. I conclude that patriarchy is an important line of inquiry for MOS, and that further attention to the concept would enable MOS research to contribute more fully to contemporary debates on gender.
在本文中,我分析了 30 年来顶级管理与组织研究(MOS)期刊中有关父权制的研究,并制定了一项议程,以(重新)点燃父权制,使其既成为一个研究课题,又成为以新的视角看待管理与组织研究关键问题的透镜。我围绕三个主题组织我的评论(175 篇文章):交叉、主题和背景。在交叉方面,我指的是学者们定义父权制的细微方式,他们采用跨学科和交叉的视角来理解父权制统治下女性经历的多样性。所谓主体,是指主要关注妇女的经历,以及妇女的主体性在父权制的工作和组织生活话语中的社会构成和协商方式。所谓背景,我指的是 MOS 研究调查父权制的地点,以及这种研究将父权制本身作为背景的方式。在这一专题回顾的基础上,我概述了未来的研究议程,以便从三个关键方面进一步完善 MOS 概念。我呼吁增加以父权制和性别的结构/政治力量为中心的研究方法,更多地关注男性作为父权制统治的推动者和主体的经历,以及更多地关注西方背景下的父权制,以纠正全球南部父权制研究过多的问题。我的结论是,父权制是 MOS 的一个重要研究方向,对这一概念的进一步关注将使 MOS 研究能够为当代有关性别的辩论做出更充分的贡献。
期刊介绍:
Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.