Anticholinergic Medication Burden and Cognitive Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease without Dementia.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae041
Lauren G Santos, Lauren E Kenney, Alyssa Ray, Alfredo Paredes, Adrianna M Ratajska, Kara Eversole, Bhavana Patel, Ashley E Rawls, Michael S Okun, Dawn Bowers
{"title":"Anticholinergic Medication Burden and Cognitive Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease without Dementia.","authors":"Lauren G Santos, Lauren E Kenney, Alyssa Ray, Alfredo Paredes, Adrianna M Ratajska, Kara Eversole, Bhavana Patel, Ashley E Rawls, Michael S Okun, Dawn Bowers","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive changes are heterogeneous in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study compared whether anticholinergic burden drives differences in cognitive domain performance and empirically-derived PD-cognitive phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective chart review contained participants (n = 493) who had idiopathic PD without dementia. Participants' medications were scored (0-3) and summed based on the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale (ACBS). We examined the ACBS' relationship to five cognitive domain composites (normative z-scores) and three (K-means clustering based) cognitive phenotypes: cognitively intact, low executive function (EF), and predominately impaired EF/memory. Analyses included Spearman correlations, analysis of covariance, and Pearson chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, phenotypes did not differ in anticholinergic burden, and (after false-discovery-rate corrections) no cognitive domains related. When comparing those above and below the clinically relevant ACBS cutoff (i.e., score ≥3), no significant phenotype or domain differences were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anticholinergic medication usage did not drive cognitive performance in a large clinical sample of idiopathic PD without dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1443-1449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive changes are heterogeneous in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study compared whether anticholinergic burden drives differences in cognitive domain performance and empirically-derived PD-cognitive phenotypes.

Method: A retrospective chart review contained participants (n = 493) who had idiopathic PD without dementia. Participants' medications were scored (0-3) and summed based on the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale (ACBS). We examined the ACBS' relationship to five cognitive domain composites (normative z-scores) and three (K-means clustering based) cognitive phenotypes: cognitively intact, low executive function (EF), and predominately impaired EF/memory. Analyses included Spearman correlations, analysis of covariance, and Pearson chi-squared test.

Results: Overall, phenotypes did not differ in anticholinergic burden, and (after false-discovery-rate corrections) no cognitive domains related. When comparing those above and below the clinically relevant ACBS cutoff (i.e., score ≥3), no significant phenotype or domain differences were found.

Conclusions: Anticholinergic medication usage did not drive cognitive performance in a large clinical sample of idiopathic PD without dementia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无痴呆症帕金森病患者的抗胆碱能药物负担和认知亚型。
目的:帕金森病(PD)患者的认知变化多种多样。本研究比较了抗胆碱能负荷是否会导致认知领域表现的差异以及根据经验得出的帕金森病认知表型:一项回顾性病历审查包含了患有特发性帕金森病且无痴呆症的参与者(n = 493)。根据抗胆碱能认知负担量表(ACBS)对参与者的用药情况进行评分(0-3分)和加总。我们研究了 ACBS 与五个认知领域复合体(常模 Z 值)和三种认知表型(基于 K-均值聚类)之间的关系:认知完好、执行功能(EF)低下和 EF/记忆力严重受损。分析包括斯皮尔曼相关性、协方差分析和皮尔逊卡方检验:结果:总体而言,表型在抗胆碱能负荷方面没有差异,而且(经过误诊率校正后)没有认知领域相关。在比较高于和低于 ACBS 临床相关临界值(即得分≥3)的患者时,没有发现明显的表型或领域差异:结论:抗胆碱能药物的使用并不会影响无痴呆的特发性帕金森病大样本患者的认知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Language and Cognitive Impairments in Multiple Sclerosis: a Comparative Study of RRMS and SPMS Patients. Relationship Between Cognitive Estimation, Executive Functions, and Theory of Mind in Patients With Prefrontal Cortex Damage. Improving Access to Dementia Care in the Era of Monoclonal Antibody Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: a Pilot Clinical Protocol Using Abbreviated Neuropsychological Assessment. Anticholinergic Medication Burden and Cognitive Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease without Dementia. Examining the role of depression on the relationship between performance-based and self-reported cognitive functioning after sport-related concussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1