Competing Models of Personality Disorder: Relations With Psychosocial Functioning.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1177/10731911241253409
Eunyoe Ro, Hallie Nuzum, Lee Anna Clark
{"title":"Competing Models of Personality Disorder: Relations With Psychosocial Functioning.","authors":"Eunyoe Ro, Hallie Nuzum, Lee Anna Clark","doi":"10.1177/10731911241253409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition</i> (<i>DSM-5</i>; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), includes 10 categorical personality disorders (PD) in Section II (Section II PD) and a dimensional alternative model of PD (AMPD) in Section III. We compared the two models in explaining concurrent psychosocial functioning levels in psychiatric outpatients and community residents screened as at risk for PD pathology (<i>N</i> = 600). The AMPD's fully dimensional form showed stronger associations with psychosocial difficulties and explained more of their variance compared with the categorical Section II PD. AMPD Criterion A (personality functioning impairment) and Criterion B (pathological traits) incrementally predicted psychosocial functioning about equally with some unique predictions. Finally, AMPD's six categorical PD diagnoses did not show stronger associations with psychosocial functioning than the corresponding Section II PD diagnoses. Findings directly comparing the two models remain important and timely for informing future conceptualizations of PD in the diagnostic system.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"321-334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241253409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013), includes 10 categorical personality disorders (PD) in Section II (Section II PD) and a dimensional alternative model of PD (AMPD) in Section III. We compared the two models in explaining concurrent psychosocial functioning levels in psychiatric outpatients and community residents screened as at risk for PD pathology (N = 600). The AMPD's fully dimensional form showed stronger associations with psychosocial difficulties and explained more of their variance compared with the categorical Section II PD. AMPD Criterion A (personality functioning impairment) and Criterion B (pathological traits) incrementally predicted psychosocial functioning about equally with some unique predictions. Finally, AMPD's six categorical PD diagnoses did not show stronger associations with psychosocial functioning than the corresponding Section II PD diagnoses. Findings directly comparing the two models remain important and timely for informing future conceptualizations of PD in the diagnostic system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格障碍的竞争模式:与社会心理功能的关系》。
精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5;美国精神病学协会,2013 年)第二部分包括 10 种分类人格障碍(PD)(第二部分 PD),第三部分包括人格障碍的维度替代模型(AMPD)。我们比较了这两个模型在解释精神科门诊患者和被筛查出有人格障碍病理风险的社区居民(600 人)的并发社会心理功能水平方面的作用。与分类的第二部分 PD 相比,AMPD 的全维度形式显示出与社会心理障碍更强的关联性,并能解释更多的变异。AMPD 标准 A(人格功能障碍)和标准 B(病理特质)对社会心理功能的预测作用大致相同,但有一些独特的预测作用。最后,AMPD 的六个分类人格功能障碍诊断与社会心理功能的关联性并不比相应的第二部分人格功能障碍诊断更强。直接比较这两种模型的研究结果对于未来诊断系统中的帕金森病概念化仍然非常重要和及时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Implicit Theories in Sexual Offending Using Indirect Measures: Feasibility, Reliability, and Incremental Validity. Measures of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Use in Clinical and Research Settings. Competing Models of Personality Disorder: Relations With Psychosocial Functioning. Three-Dimensional Narcissism Scale for Children: Structure, Reliability, and Construct Validity. Development of the Short Form for Chronic Hepatitis B Quality of Life Instrument (CHBQOL-SF) Using Delphi Method and Rasch Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1