Emergency Department SpO2/FiO2 Ratios Correlate with Mechanical Ventilation and Intensive Care Unit Requirements in COVID-19 Patients.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.5811/westjem.17975
Gary Zhang, Michael J Burla, Benjamin B Caesar, Carolyne R Falank, Peter Kyros, Victoria C Zucco, Aneta Strumilowska, Daniel C Cullinane, Forest R Sheppard
{"title":"Emergency Department SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> Ratios Correlate with Mechanical Ventilation and Intensive Care Unit Requirements in COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Gary Zhang, Michael J Burla, Benjamin B Caesar, Carolyne R Falank, Peter Kyros, Victoria C Zucco, Aneta Strumilowska, Daniel C Cullinane, Forest R Sheppard","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk for respiratory dysfunction. The pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) ratio is a non-invasive assessment of respiratory dysfunction substituted for the PaO<sub>2</sub>:FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring. We hypothesized that emergency department (ED) SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios correlate with requirement for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients. Our objective was to identify COVID-19 patients at greatest risk of requiring mechanical ventilation, using SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted with COVID-19 at two hospitals. Highest and lowest SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios (percent saturation/fraction of inspired O<sub>2</sub>) were calculated on admission. We performed chi-square, univariate, and multiple regression analysis to evaluate the relationship of admission SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios with requirement for mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 539 patients (46% female; 84% White), with a mean age 67.6 ± 18.6 years, met inclusion criteria. Patients who required mechanical ventilation during their hospital stay were statistically younger in age (<i>P</i> = 0.001), had a higher body mass index (<i>P</i> < .001), and there was a higher percentage of patients who were obese (<i>P</i> = 0.03) and morbidly obese (<i>P</i> < .001). Shortness of breath, cough, and fever were the most common presenting symptoms with a median temperature of 99°F. Average white blood count was higher in patients who required ventilation (<i>P</i> = <0.001). A highest obtained ED SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio of ≤300 was associated with a requirement for mechanical ventilation. A lowest obtained ED SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio of ≤300 was associated with a requirement for intensive care unit care. There was no statistically significant correlation between ED SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios >300 and mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) requirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ED SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratios correlated with mechanical ventilation and ICU requirements during hospitalization for COVID-19. These results support ED SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> as a possible triage tool and predictor of hospital resource requirements for patients admitted with COVID-19. Further investigation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 3","pages":"325-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk for respiratory dysfunction. The pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) ratio is a non-invasive assessment of respiratory dysfunction substituted for the PaO2:FiO2 ratio in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring. We hypothesized that emergency department (ED) SpO2/FiO2 ratios correlate with requirement for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients. Our objective was to identify COVID-19 patients at greatest risk of requiring mechanical ventilation, using SpO2/FiO2 ratios.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted with COVID-19 at two hospitals. Highest and lowest SpO2/FiO2 ratios (percent saturation/fraction of inspired O2) were calculated on admission. We performed chi-square, univariate, and multiple regression analysis to evaluate the relationship of admission SpO2/FiO2 ratios with requirement for mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) care.

Results: A total of 539 patients (46% female; 84% White), with a mean age 67.6 ± 18.6 years, met inclusion criteria. Patients who required mechanical ventilation during their hospital stay were statistically younger in age (P = 0.001), had a higher body mass index (P < .001), and there was a higher percentage of patients who were obese (P = 0.03) and morbidly obese (P < .001). Shortness of breath, cough, and fever were the most common presenting symptoms with a median temperature of 99°F. Average white blood count was higher in patients who required ventilation (P = <0.001). A highest obtained ED SpO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤300 was associated with a requirement for mechanical ventilation. A lowest obtained ED SpO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤300 was associated with a requirement for intensive care unit care. There was no statistically significant correlation between ED SpO2/FiO2 ratios >300 and mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) requirement.

Conclusion: The ED SpO2/FiO2 ratios correlated with mechanical ventilation and ICU requirements during hospitalization for COVID-19. These results support ED SpO2/FiO2 as a possible triage tool and predictor of hospital resource requirements for patients admitted with COVID-19. Further investigation is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科 SpO2/FiO2 比率与 COVID-19 患者的机械通气和重症监护室需求相关。
背景:冠状病毒2019(COVID-19)患者是呼吸功能障碍的高危人群。脉搏氧饱和度/吸入氧分压(SpO2/FiO2)比值是呼吸功能障碍的一种无创评估,可替代器官功能衰竭序列评估评分中的 PaO2:FiO2 比值。我们假设急诊科(ED)的 SpO2/FiO2 比值与 COVID-19 患者的机械通气需求相关。我们的目标是利用SpO2/FiO2比值确定需要机械通气风险最大的COVID-19患者:我们对两家医院收治的 COVID-19 患者进行了回顾性分析。计算入院时最高和最低的 SpO2/FiO2 比率(饱和度百分比/吸入氧气分量)。我们进行了卡方、单变量和多元回归分析,以评估入院时SpO2/FiO2比值与机械通气和重症监护室(ICU)护理需求的关系:共有 539 名患者(46% 女性;84% 白人)符合纳入标准,平均年龄为 67.6 ± 18.6 岁。据统计,住院期间需要机械通气的患者年龄较小(P = 0.001),体重指数较高(P P = 0.03),病态肥胖(P P = 2/FiO2比值≤300与需要机械通气有关。ED SpO2/FiO2 比率最低值≤300 与需要重症监护室护理有关。ED SpO2/FiO2比率>300与机械通气或重症监护室(ICU)需求之间没有统计学意义上的相关性:结论:COVID-19 患者住院期间,急诊室 SpO2/FiO2 比率与机械通气和重症监护室需求相关。这些结果支持将 ED SpO2/FiO2 作为一种可能的分诊工具,并预测 COVID-19 患者的住院资源需求。还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Prehospital Ultrasound Training on Simulated Paramedic Clinical Decision-Making. Interfacility Patient Transfers During COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed-Methods Study. Making A Difference: Launching a Multimodal, Resident-Run Social Emergency Medicine Program. Methadone Initiation in the Emergency Department for Opioid Use Disorder. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Sepsis in Adult Patients Meeting Two or More Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1