Western Journal of Emergency Medicine最新文献

Introduction: The emergency department (ED) is a setting where communication occurs often and with potential consequences for patient care. In this study we sought to determine nurse and physician perspectives on the nature and implications of effective and ineffective communication in the ED.

Methods: We used a mixed-methods design, including an online survey followed by in-person focus groups with emergency nurses (EN) and emergency physicians (EP). Participants were recruited through email listserves to emergency staff at four hospitals. We integrated quantitative survey results with focus-group themes.

Results: A total of 115 eligible ENs and EPs completed the initial questionnaire (50% response rate from ENs, 65% response rate from EPs). Responses from nurses and physicians were similar; both noted that poor communication is frequent, adversely affects patient care and ED function, affects trust, particularly between individuals, and that non-verbal communication behaviors affect team communication. In the focus groups (consisting of 18 EPs and 17 ENs), six themes emerged: 1) Situations, built physical environment, and medium of communications all impact quality of communication; 2) core elements of desired professional communication include respect and attention, often conveyed through non-verbal behaviors; 3) poor communication begets poor communication and influences interpersonal relationships; 4) effective communication is seen as fundamental to patient care but also has impacts beyond patient care; 5) clinician gender and gender dyads influence communication dynamics; and 6) participants were able to identify learning activities and techniques for effective communication.

Conclusion: Emergency nurses and physicians across four EDs described failures of communication as both frequent and significant to patient care. This study identified characteristics of effective communication, complex factors influencing communication, and emphasized the whole-team impact of communication quality.

Introduction: Following the 2022 Dobbs Supreme Court decision, emergency department (ED) use for early pregnancy complications (EPC), such as miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy, may increase in states that enacted severely restrictive abortion policies. Patients may increasingly seek EPC-related care in the ED due to delays in treatment resulting in greater symptom severity or reduced access to usual settings of obstetric and family planning care. Our objective in this study was to examine the association between severely restrictive abortion policies and post-Dobbs EPC-related ED visits.

Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the 2016-2022 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Our primary outcome measure was ED visits among female patients 15-49 years of age for EPC-related care, defined using encounter diagnosis code or chief complaint. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between US region and post-Dobbs, EPC-related visits, as the number of states with severely restrictive abortion policies (bans from conception to six weeks) varied by region, from zero (Northeast) to 10 of 17 states in the South.

Results: We identified 7,872,445 weighted EPC-related visits (unweighted n = 1,008) among 266,222,232 weighted (unweighted n = 32,841) encounters for female patients 15-49 years of age (3.0%). The median age was 28 (IQR 23-32). The proportion of pre- vs post-Dobbs EPC-related visits was 3.1% vs 2.5% in the Northeast (P = .72); 3.2% vs 3.5% in the West (P = .80); 2.4% vs 3.1% in the Midwest (P = .36); and 2.9% vs 3.7% in the South (P = .50). Compared to the Northeast, the adjusted odds of post-Dobbs EPC-related visits were 1.4 in the West (95% CI, 0.4-5.2), 1.4 in the Midwest (95% CI, 0.4-4.6), and 1.3 in the South (95% CI, 0.4-4.7).

Conclusion: This preliminary study did not find a statistically significant association between US region and post-Dobbs ED visits for early pregnancy complications. However, given the increasing restrictions surrounding reproductive healthcare access, the ED represents an important setting for the delivery of this care. Further investigations using more robust data sources are needed to understand the effect of prohibitive abortion laws on the ED use and the management of early obstetric complications.

Introduction: California has one of the highest rates of homelessness in the United States. Unhoused individuals often have complex medical and behavioral health disorders, frequently complicated by substance use disorders. They have a significant risk of sustaining traumatic injuries. This report compares unhoused and domiciled patients treated at our Northern California trauma center.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis of trauma patients we used data extracted from our institution's Trauma Quality Improvement Program Trauma Registry for January 1, 2019-April 22, 2022 and compared characteristics of unhoused and domiciled individuals. All unhoused patients in the registry were included in the analysis, as well as an equal number of domiciled patients who were randomly selected during the same time frame. We described and compared demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: Of 8,529 patients in the registry, 181 (2.1%) were unhoused, and we selected 181 domiciled patients to compare. Unhoused patients were more likely male (83% vs. 61%, P < .001) and younger (48.8 ± 12.3 vs. 55. 8 ± 23.7 years, P <.001). Both cohorts had similar Injury Severity Scores. However, unhoused patients had a higher rate of hospital admissions (76.8% vs. 61.9%, P <.001) and longer hospital stays than domiciled patients (4.0 [IQR 2.0-9.0] days vs. 3.0 [IQR 1.0-6.0] days, respectively; P = .02). A higher proportion of unhoused patients received alcohol-(85.6% vs. 74.6%, P = .01) and drug screening (56.4% vs. 30.4%, P < .001) than domiciled patients. Of those screened for urine drugs, unhoused patients had a higher positive rate (76.5% vs. 50.9%, P < .001). Unhoused patients were more frequently injured by assault (30.4% vs. 8.8%, P < .001) or pedestrian strike (21.5% vs. 3.3%, P < .001), whereas more domiciled patients were injured in falls (46.4% vs. 21.5%, P < .001) and motor vehicle accidents (29.8% vs. 8.3%, P < .001). Falls were most common in the oldest quartile for both groups. In both cohorts, a "sharp object" was the most common mechanism of assault injury (40.0% vs. 37.5%, respectively). Assault by firearm occurred in 14.5% of unhoused and 18.8% of domiciled patients. Overall mortality was 2.2%, with no significant difference between groups (1.7 vs. 2.8%, P = .70).

Conclusion: Unhoused patients were predominantly younger males with a higher incidence of substance use disorder and greater likelihood of injuries from assault and pedestrian strikes. Falls and assault with a sharp object were common in both cohorts. Unhoused patients were admitted more often and stayed longer in the hospital. Understanding the complexities of these patients can guide local and regional prevention and treatment measures.

Introduction: Timely identification of critically ill or injured children in prehospital and emergency settings remains a persistent challenge due to developmental variability, low case volumes in emergency medical services (EMS), and contextual limitations during field assessments. Existing frameworks to identify at-risk children often fail to capture the nuances of pediatric presentations, particularly in resource-limited or mass casualty settings. We aimed to explore prehospital and hospital-based clinician perspectives to inform a Delphi survey for the development of a consensus-driven definition of pediatric critical illness and injury.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using one semi-structured interview and two focus groups with participants with expertise in pediatric prehospital and hospital acute care. Participants were presented with a list of tools commonly used to assess the severity of illness in children in the emergency department and hospital-based settings. Interviews were conducted virtually, transcribed, coded using an iterative process, and thematically analyzed. We used key themes to inform the structure and priorities for a future Delphi survey.

Results: Six of the 12 invited participants took part in the study. Five major themes emerged: 1) prehospital indicators of critical illness (e.g., seizure, intravenous placement, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; 2) in-hospital markers of severity (e.g., air medical transport, intubation, diagnostic findings); 3) perceptions of existing triage tools (e.g., limited awareness or utility among paramedics); 4) differences in assessment approaches across roles and settings; and 5) specific triage challenges during mass casualty or disaster scenarios. Paramedics emphasized clinical actions as indicators of acuity, while physicians cited diagnostic findings and broader contextual indicators. Across roles, there was more agreement on the limitations of current triage and illness severity tools than on their utility.

Conclusion: We gained insights into key gaps in current pediatric triage systems, including limited applicability of existing tools in prehospital settings, variability in comfort with pediatric interventions, and the lack of alignment between paramedic action-based indicators and physician reliance on diagnostic findings. Role-specific experiences influence how critical status is assessed and highlight the value of integrating multidisciplinary insight. These findings inform future work focused on the development of consensus-based outcome measures that align with decision-making across prehospital and hospital environments.

Introduction: Patients who report sexual assault in the emergency department (ED) have a legal right to a forensic exam. Emergency departments that do not provide such exams must offer transfer to a forensic site. Little is known about the factors influencing whether patients are offered a forensic exam and complete the transfer. In this study we aimed to identify patient characteristics associated with being offered a forensic exam in an ED that does not perform them on site.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients presenting to a single, urban, academic ED between January 2017-December 2019. The ED receives over 75,000 visits annually and refers patients to an external site for forensic exams. Using keywords "sexual assault" or "rape" we identified charts that included whether the visit involved an initial report of sexual assault. Charts were abstracted for demographics, insurance status, psychiatric history, clinician concern for acute mental illness or substance use, and mode of arrival. The primary outcome was whether a forensic exam was offered. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and penalized logistic regression.

Results: Of 167 charts reviewed, 108 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 94 patients (87.0%) were offered a forensic exam and 14 (64.8%) accepted transfer. Patients who were offered exams were younger (mean age 29.9 vs 36.8 years, P = .05), more likely to arrive ambulatory (69.1 vs 42.9%, P = .02), and less likely to have a psychiatric history (31.9 vs 71.4%, P = .01). Clinician concern for acute psychiatric illness or substance use was significantly associated with not offering a forensic exam (64.3 vs 16.0%, P < .001). In regression analysis, this concern was the only independent association of not being offered a forensic exam (adjusted odds ratio 0.16, 95% CI, 0.03-0.76, P = .02). Additionally, 23.1% of patients were uninsured, significantly higher than the local rate of 2.7%.

Conclusion: Patients in the ED who report sexual assault are less likely to be offered a forensic exam if they present with signs of acute mental illness or substance use disorder. These findings highlight the need for standardized protocols and advocacy to ensure equitable access to forensic exams, especially for patients with behavioral health needs or without insurance.

Introduction: Viewing a solar eclipse without proper eye protection can lead to ocular injuries such as solar retinopathy or photokeratitis. The April 8, 2024, solar eclipse in the southern and eastern United States presented a rare opportunity to assess the public health impact of such events on eye-related emergency department (ED) visits.

Methods: We identified a total of 1,774 ED visits for eye injuries across both periods. There were 853 visits before the eclipse and 921 visits after, showing no statistically significant difference (X² = 1.432, P > .05) between the two time periods.

Results: We identified a total of 1,774 ED visits for eye injuries across both periods. There were 853 visits before the eclipse and 921 visits after. The chi-square statistic (X² = 1.432, degree of freedom = 1, P > .05) indicated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of eye injuries between the two time periods.

Conclusion: Despite concerns regarding eclipse-related eye injuries, we found no statistically significant increase in ED visits for ocular pain or photokeratitis following the April 8, 2024, solar eclipse. These results suggest that public education campaigns promoting safe eclipse viewing may have been effective. Ongoing efforts are warranted to continue promoting ocular safety during future eclipses.

Introduction: Over 350,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occur annually in the United States, with neurologically intact survival below 10%. Recent literature demonstrates that survival is lower in communities of color and non-English speakers. Social determinants of health, such as healthcare access, language, and literacy, may serve as barriers to receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education and using the skills learned. Current research is sparse on identifying barriers contributing to the lack of CPR education and use in non-English speaking communities. We hypothesized that barriers to CPR education and use differ between English- and Spanish-speaking learners. This study provides insights into how classes could be tailored to address disparities in CPR education and use.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study we used survey-based research to assess the knowledge, comfort, and perceived barriers to activating the 9-1-1 system and performing bystander CPR. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling at community-based events in Roanoke, Virginia. We directly compared responses between language groups using Fisher tests within R, adjusting for various demographic factors.

Results: We collected 367 surveys from the 550 participants (estimated 50 attendees each for 11 events) for a response rate of 66.7%. Of the surveys collected, 231 (63%) were in English and 136 (37%) in Spanish. Spanish-speakers were more concerned with immigration status (7% vs 1%), doing something wrong (14% vs 7%), and language barrier (31% vs 1%) compared to English-speakers when asked why they may not call 9-1-1. We found that 72% of English-speakers would have no problem calling 9-1-1, compared to only 16% of Spanish-speakers. Regardless of language, the most prevalent barrier to initiating CPR was the "fear of doing something wrong" with 49% of Spanish-speakers and 28% of English-speakers endorsing this as a barrier. Only 10% of Spanish speakers would have no concerns starting CPR, compared to 54% of English-speakers. Language was reported by 21% of Spanish-speakers vs 2% of English-speakers as a barrier to administering CPR.

Conclusion: Results of this pilot study highlight that Spanish-speaking respondents were less comfortable calling 9-1-1 and initiating CPR compared to English-speaking respondents. While there were some shared barriers between the groups, Spanish-speaking respondents were more likely to identify a barrier overall. These results suggest that marginalized communities would benefit from tailored educational models that address their unique challenges. Further research is necessary to better understand how social determinants of health serve as barriers to CPR education/use in specific communities.

Introduction: In North America, suicide ranks among the top causes of death in individuals 15-60 years of age. In this study we aimed to determine whether an emergency department (ED) presentation for suicidal behaviors accompanied by acute alcohol intoxication was associated with increased six-month suicide or all-cause mortality compared to non-intoxicated presentations of suicidal behaviors.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥ 18 years) presenting to 16 EDs in Alberta, Canada, between April 2011-March 2021. Suicidal attempt or self-harm was identified via International Classification of Diseases codes, 10th Rev, Canadian Enhancement (ICD-10-CA). Patients were classified as acutely intoxicated if they had relevant ICD-10-CA codes or a blood alcohol concentration ≥ 2 millimoles per liter (9.2 milligrams per deciliter). We excluded patients who died on arrival, were transferred, or were non-residents. The primary outcome was suicide-specific mortality at six months; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, use of involuntary holds, psychiatric consultations, admissions, and ED return visits. Median differences with 95% confidence intervals and unadjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI were reported for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

Results: Among 58,051 suicidal or self-harm patients, 17,488 (30%) were classified as intoxicated. Six-month suicide mortality was similar between intoxicated and non-intoxicated groups (0.3% each; adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.73-1.38]), indicating no significant association between alcohol intoxication and suicide-specific death. Intoxicated patients were more often male (58% vs 52%; OR 1.26 [1.22-1.31]), arrived by ambulance (70% vs 50%; OR 2.32 [2.23-2.41]), and were more frequently placed on involuntary holds (26% vs 16%; OR 1.92 [1.83-2.00]). They had fewer hospital admissions (10.8% vs 15.4%; OR 0.63 [0.60-0.67]), longer ED stays (411 vs 277 minutes; median difference = 134 minutes [127.7-140.3]), and higher ED return rates at 30 days (19.8% vs 18.3%; OR 1.10 [1.05-1.15]) and six months (45.8% vs 42.1%; OR 1.16 [1.12-1.20]).

Conclusion: Acute alcohol intoxication among ED patients presenting with suicidal behaviors was not independently associated with higher six-month suicide mortality. Patients with acute alcohol intoxication had increased use of involuntary holds, longer lengths of stay, and more frequent ED return visits. Future work should explore other psychosocial and clinical factors, including substance use and psychiatric comorbidities, that may influence outcomes beyond the acute setting.

Introduction: Seizures are one of the most common neurological presentations to an emergency department (ED), often as a first seizure of life or a breakthrough seizure. There is practice variation regarding the diagnostic workup and management for these patient populations. A standardized pathway for emergent evaluation of first seizure of life or breakthrough seizure currently does not exist, resulting in variability in evaluation and timing of outpatient care.

Methods: We created standardized pathways for evaluation and management of patients presenting to the ED with a first seizure of life or breakthrough seizure. These pathways, implemented at a large, quaternary-care hospital system, were utilized on 130 patients presenting with a seizure and compared with all patients with seizure on whom the pathway was not used, between May 2022-October 2023. Outcomes of interest included ED length of stay (LOS), proportion of patients admitted, time to outpatient follow-up, and difference in resource utilization. We compared categorical variables using chi-square test and continuous variables using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Equality of variance between the two cohorts was tested using the Levene test.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the percentage of male and female patients evaluated via standard-of-care model (45.6% and 49.5%) and those on the pathway (56.9% and 43.1%). The average age of patients was similar between standard-of-care and pathway groups (41 and 39 years, respectively). Median ED LOS was 5.0 (Interquartile range [IQR] 2.9-9.4) hours for standard of care and 4.8 (IQR 3.1-7.0) hours for pathway (P = .34), with a significant difference in variability in time for pathway group (P < .001). Fewer patients were admitted or observed with pathway use (P < .02). Median time to outpatient follow-up was 41.0 days (IQR 17.0-93.0) with standard of care and 23.5 days (IQR 8.0-57.0) with pathway use (P < .001). More urinalyses (P < .001), drug screens (P < .001), alcohol levels (P < .001) and computed tomography for first seizures (P < .001) were ordered for the pathway group. Fewer magnetic resonance imaging studies were ordered for patients in the breakthrough seizures group using the pathway (P < .001).

Conclusion: Standardized pathways to approach seizure presentation in the ED can reduce variability in care, improve time to outpatient neurologic care, and standardize seizure-safety counseling.