Who are the patients who use non-pharmacological home remedies? Cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family practice Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmae030
Paul Sebo, Neria E Winkler, Marie Morel, Mohamed Amir Moussa, Dagmar M Haller, Hubert Maisonneuve
{"title":"Who are the patients who use non-pharmacological home remedies? Cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France.","authors":"Paul Sebo, Neria E Winkler, Marie Morel, Mohamed Amir Moussa, Dagmar M Haller, Hubert Maisonneuve","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients may be tempted to use non-pharmacological home remedies (NPHRs) to relieve various complaints. To the best of our knowledge, there is little data on the characteristics of patients using NPHRs. In this cross-sectional study carried out between March 2020 and July 2021, we examined the socio-demographic factors underlying their use in patient populations in Switzerland and France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using official registries, we randomly selected 50 primary care physicians (PCPs) in Geneva (Switzerland) and Lyon/Grenoble (France). Seven research assistants consecutively recruited patients from PCP waiting rooms (20-25 patients per practice). Patients completed a paper-based questionnaire assessing the use [yes/no] of 304 NPHRs for 79 medical conditions. The NPHR list was developed by our team with input from 97 patients. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regressions, adjusting for intra-cluster correlations, to examine associations between NPHR use and patient characteristics (gender, age, practice location, nationality, education level, and self-rated health).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1198 eligible patients, 1012 agreed to participate (85%). Overall, 635 patients (63%) reported using at least one of the remedies tested in the study. In multivariable analysis, women (OR = 1.7 [95%CI = 1.3-2.3], P-value < 0.001), younger patients (< 40 years: OR = 2.1 [95%CI = 1.6-2.9], P-value < 0.001), and French patients (OR = 1.6 [95%CI = 1.1-2.3], P-value < 0.001) tended to use NPHRs more often than other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many patients, particularly women, young people, and French patients, reported using NPHRs. This survey's findings hold the potential to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers about the diverse preferences that shape patients' healthcare choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"841-845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many patients may be tempted to use non-pharmacological home remedies (NPHRs) to relieve various complaints. To the best of our knowledge, there is little data on the characteristics of patients using NPHRs. In this cross-sectional study carried out between March 2020 and July 2021, we examined the socio-demographic factors underlying their use in patient populations in Switzerland and France.

Methods: Using official registries, we randomly selected 50 primary care physicians (PCPs) in Geneva (Switzerland) and Lyon/Grenoble (France). Seven research assistants consecutively recruited patients from PCP waiting rooms (20-25 patients per practice). Patients completed a paper-based questionnaire assessing the use [yes/no] of 304 NPHRs for 79 medical conditions. The NPHR list was developed by our team with input from 97 patients. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regressions, adjusting for intra-cluster correlations, to examine associations between NPHR use and patient characteristics (gender, age, practice location, nationality, education level, and self-rated health).

Results: Of the 1198 eligible patients, 1012 agreed to participate (85%). Overall, 635 patients (63%) reported using at least one of the remedies tested in the study. In multivariable analysis, women (OR = 1.7 [95%CI = 1.3-2.3], P-value < 0.001), younger patients (< 40 years: OR = 2.1 [95%CI = 1.6-2.9], P-value < 0.001), and French patients (OR = 1.6 [95%CI = 1.1-2.3], P-value < 0.001) tended to use NPHRs more often than other patients.

Conclusions: Many patients, particularly women, young people, and French patients, reported using NPHRs. This survey's findings hold the potential to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers about the diverse preferences that shape patients' healthcare choices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁是使用非药物家庭疗法的患者?瑞士和法国的横断面研究。
背景:许多患者可能会使用非药物家庭疗法(NPHRs)来缓解各种不适。据我们所知,有关使用非药物家庭疗法的患者特征的数据很少。在这项于 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 7 月进行的横断面研究中,我们考察了瑞士和法国患者使用非药物家庭疗法的社会人口因素:利用官方登记册,我们随机抽取了日内瓦(瑞士)和里昂/格勒诺布尔(法国)的 50 名初级保健医生(PCP)。七名研究助理从初级保健医生的候诊室连续招募患者(每个诊所 20-25 名患者)。患者填写了一份纸质问卷,对 79 种病症使用 304 种 NPHR 的情况进行评估(是/否)。NPHR 列表由我们的团队根据 97 名患者的意见制定。我们使用了单变量和多变量逻辑回归,并对组内相关性进行了调整,以研究 NPHR 使用情况与患者特征(性别、年龄、执业地点、国籍、教育水平和自评健康状况)之间的关联:在 1198 名符合条件的患者中,1012 人同意参与(85%)。总体而言,有 635 名患者(63%)表示至少使用了一种在研究中测试过的疗法。在多变量分析中,女性(OR = 1.7 [95%CI = 1.3-2.3],P-值 结论:许多患者,尤其是女性、年轻人和儿童,都曾使用过药物:许多患者,尤其是女性、年轻人和法国患者,都报告使用过 NPHRs。这项调查的结果有可能为医疗服务提供者、政策制定者和研究人员提供信息,帮助他们了解影响患者医疗选择的各种偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic treatment for acute sinusitis and subsequent health care use and work absence: a nationwide registry study from Norway. Exploring determinants of patient attitudes toward telemedicine in primary care: a cross-sectional study in Türkiye. Bio-psycho-social situations suitable for the use of teleconsultation in general practice: a doctor-patient mirror study. Security and privacy in e-health technologies: a scoping review of challenges and strategies in primary care. Can the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) be used to predict liver fibrosis risk instead of the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4)?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1