The Association Between Overall, Healthy, and Unhealthy Plant-Based Diet Index and Risk of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae049
Ali Nikparast, Parmis Mirzaei, Zeinab S Tadayoni, Golaleh Asghari
{"title":"The Association Between Overall, Healthy, and Unhealthy Plant-Based Diet Index and Risk of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.","authors":"Ali Nikparast, Parmis Mirzaei, Zeinab S Tadayoni, Golaleh Asghari","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The global incidence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has increased substantially in recent years. Among the established, modifiable lifestyle factors associated with favorable prediabetes and T2DM risk, healthy dietary patterns have attracted considerable attention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The association between adherence to plant-based dietary pattern indices (PDIs), including the overall PDI (O-PDI), healthy PDI (H-PDI), and unhealthy PDI (U-PDI), and the risk of prediabetes and T2DM was investigated in this study.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature search was conducted of the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases from their inception to February 2024. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using random effects models and dose-response analyses. The Cochran Q test and the I2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A total of 16 publications, with data on a total of 721 012 participants, were identified for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>According to a pooled analysis, compared with the lowest category of O-PDI and H-PDI adherence, the highest category was associated with a 14% and 19% reduction in T2DM risk, respectively, for O-PDI (effect size [ES] = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.82-0.90; I2 = 57.7) and H-PDI (ES = 0.81; 95%CI, 0.75-0.88; I2 = 82.6). Greater adherence to U-PDI was significantly associated with an 10% increase in the risk of T2DM (ES = 1.10; 95%CI, 1.04-1.16). Consistent associations were found within the predetermined subgroups. As well, there was a nonlinear inverse association between O-PDI, H-PDI, and T2DM risk. No significant association was found between adherence to O-PDI (ES = 0.87; 95%CI, 0.75-1.01; I2 = 68%), H-PDI (ES = 0.99; 95%CI, 0.87-1.13; I2 = 0.0%), and U-PDI (ES = 1.09; 95%CI, 0.94-1.21; I2 = 22.9%) and risk of prediabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the importance of dietary selections within the framework of a plant-based dietary pattern, particularly when incorporating healthful, plant-based foods, which may have potential benefits in reducing the T2DM risk.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023459851.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The global incidence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has increased substantially in recent years. Among the established, modifiable lifestyle factors associated with favorable prediabetes and T2DM risk, healthy dietary patterns have attracted considerable attention.

Objective: The association between adherence to plant-based dietary pattern indices (PDIs), including the overall PDI (O-PDI), healthy PDI (H-PDI), and unhealthy PDI (U-PDI), and the risk of prediabetes and T2DM was investigated in this study.

Data sources: A literature search was conducted of the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases from their inception to February 2024. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using random effects models and dose-response analyses. The Cochran Q test and the I2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies.

Data extraction: A total of 16 publications, with data on a total of 721 012 participants, were identified for the meta-analysis.

Data analysis: According to a pooled analysis, compared with the lowest category of O-PDI and H-PDI adherence, the highest category was associated with a 14% and 19% reduction in T2DM risk, respectively, for O-PDI (effect size [ES] = 0.86; 95%CI, 0.82-0.90; I2 = 57.7) and H-PDI (ES = 0.81; 95%CI, 0.75-0.88; I2 = 82.6). Greater adherence to U-PDI was significantly associated with an 10% increase in the risk of T2DM (ES = 1.10; 95%CI, 1.04-1.16). Consistent associations were found within the predetermined subgroups. As well, there was a nonlinear inverse association between O-PDI, H-PDI, and T2DM risk. No significant association was found between adherence to O-PDI (ES = 0.87; 95%CI, 0.75-1.01; I2 = 68%), H-PDI (ES = 0.99; 95%CI, 0.87-1.13; I2 = 0.0%), and U-PDI (ES = 1.09; 95%CI, 0.94-1.21; I2 = 22.9%) and risk of prediabetes.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of dietary selections within the framework of a plant-based dietary pattern, particularly when incorporating healthful, plant-based foods, which may have potential benefits in reducing the T2DM risk.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023459851.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整体、健康和不健康植物性饮食指数与糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病风险之间的关系:前瞻性研究的系统回顾与剂量反应元分析》。
背景:近年来,全球糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的发病率大幅上升。在已确定的与糖尿病前期和 T2DM 风险相关的可改变的生活方式因素中,健康饮食模式引起了广泛关注:本研究探讨了坚持植物性膳食模式指数(PDI),包括总体 PDI(O-PDI)、健康 PDI(H-PDI)和不健康 PDI(U-PDI)与糖尿病前期和 T2DM 风险之间的关系:对 PubMed/Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Sciences 数据库从开始到 2024 年 2 月的文献进行了检索。采用随机效应模型和剂量反应分析进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。数据提取采用 Cochran Q 检验和 I2 统计量来评估研究之间的异质性:数据分析:根据汇总分析,与O-PDI和H-PDI依从性的最低类别相比,O-PDI(效应大小[ES]=0.86;95%CI,0.82-0.90;I2=57.7)和H-PDI(ES=0.81;95%CI,0.75-0.88;I2=82.6)的最高类别与T2DM风险分别降低14%和19%相关。更严格遵守 U-PDI 与 T2DM 风险增加 10% 显著相关(ES = 1.10;95%CI,1.04-1.16)。在预定的亚组中发现了一致的关联。此外,O-PDI、H-PDI 与 T2DM 风险之间也存在非线性反比关系。坚持O-PDI(ES = 0.87;95%CI,0.75-1.01;I2 = 68%)、H-PDI(ES = 0.99;95%CI,0.87-1.13;I2 = 0.0%)和U-PDI(ES = 1.09;95%CI,0.94-1.21;I2 = 22.9%)与糖尿病前期风险之间未发现明显关联:这些发现强调了在以植物为基础的膳食模式框架内选择膳食的重要性,尤其是在纳入有益健康的植物性食物时,这可能对降低 T2DM 风险有潜在益处:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 注册号CRD42023459851。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of the Beneficial Effects of Berry Extracts on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Animal Models. Health Benefits From Diets High in Salicylates May Arise From Improved Utilization of Dietary Copper. The Longitudinal Evidence on Social Ties and Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Aging Adults: A Systematic Review. The psychological basis of hunger and its dysfunctions. Correction to: Menatetrenone (Vitamin K2) and Bone Quality in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1