Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20240034
Romualdo Sciorio, Luca Tramontano, Pier Francesco Greco, Ermanno Greco
{"title":"Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle.","authors":"Romualdo Sciorio, Luca Tramontano, Pier Francesco Greco, Ermanno Greco","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the advancement of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technology, and the rationale to extend the culture to the blastocyst stage, performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET), gamete quality and assessment have acquired large relevance in ART. Embryo quality is strictly correlated with gametes quality and culture conditions. Oocyte maturity assessment is therefore imperative for fertilization and embryo evolution. Mature oocytes at the metaphase II stage result in a higher fertilization rate compared to immature oocytes. Indeed, oocyte morphology evaluation represents an important and challenging task that may serve as a valuable prognostic tool for future embryo development and implantation potential. Different grading systems have been reported to assess human embryos, however, in many cases, it is still a major challenge to select the single embryo to transfer with the highest implantation potential. Further, eSET has conferred a challenge to embryologists, who must try to enhance embryo culture and selection to provide an adequate success rate, whilst reducing the overall number of embryos transferred. Above the standard morphological assessment, there are several invasive or non-invasive approaches for embryo selection such as preimplantation genetic testing, time-lapse technology, proteomics and metabolomics, as well as oxygen utilization and analysis of oxidative stress in culture medium. This short review is not designed to be a comprehensive review of all possible features that may influence oocyte quality. It does give, however, a brief overview and describes the prognostic value of the morphological characteristics of human oocytes on their developmental capacity following ART treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"511-520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the advancement of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technology, and the rationale to extend the culture to the blastocyst stage, performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET), gamete quality and assessment have acquired large relevance in ART. Embryo quality is strictly correlated with gametes quality and culture conditions. Oocyte maturity assessment is therefore imperative for fertilization and embryo evolution. Mature oocytes at the metaphase II stage result in a higher fertilization rate compared to immature oocytes. Indeed, oocyte morphology evaluation represents an important and challenging task that may serve as a valuable prognostic tool for future embryo development and implantation potential. Different grading systems have been reported to assess human embryos, however, in many cases, it is still a major challenge to select the single embryo to transfer with the highest implantation potential. Further, eSET has conferred a challenge to embryologists, who must try to enhance embryo culture and selection to provide an adequate success rate, whilst reducing the overall number of embryos transferred. Above the standard morphological assessment, there are several invasive or non-invasive approaches for embryo selection such as preimplantation genetic testing, time-lapse technology, proteomics and metabolomics, as well as oxygen utilization and analysis of oxidative stress in culture medium. This short review is not designed to be a comprehensive review of all possible features that may influence oocyte quality. It does give, however, a brief overview and describes the prognostic value of the morphological characteristics of human oocytes on their developmental capacity following ART treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖技术周期中卵母细胞质量的形态学评估。
随着医学辅助生殖(MAR)技术的发展,以及将培养延长到囊胚阶段、进行选择性单胚胎移植(eSET)的合理性,配子质量和评估在 ART 中变得越来越重要。胚胎质量与配子质量和培养条件密切相关。因此,卵母细胞成熟度评估对受精和胚胎进化至关重要。与不成熟的卵母细胞相比,处于分裂期 II 阶段的成熟卵母细胞受精率更高。事实上,卵母细胞形态学评估是一项重要而具有挑战性的任务,可作为未来胚胎发育和植入潜力的重要预后工具。据报道,已有不同的分级系统对人类胚胎进行评估,但在许多情况下,如何选择具有最高植入潜能的单个胚胎进行移植仍是一项重大挑战。此外,eSET 给胚胎学家带来了挑战,他们必须努力加强胚胎培养和选择,以提供足够的成功率,同时减少移植胚胎的总数。除了标准的形态学评估外,还有几种侵入性或非侵入性的胚胎选择方法,如植入前基因检测、延时技术、蛋白质组学和代谢组学,以及培养基中氧的利用和氧化应激分析。这篇简短的综述并不是对可能影响卵母细胞质量的所有可能特征的全面回顾。不过,它确实提供了一个简短的概述,并描述了人类卵母细胞的形态特征对 ART 治疗后其发育能力的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the day 3 transfer strategy for POSEIDON patients. Apolipoprotein A1: A potential biomarker in the secretome of euploid and aneuploid human embryos. Perception of fertility, quality of life, and depression in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. Predictors of Pregnancy after Artificial Insemination in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. The effect of COVID-19 vaccination on serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone in women of reproductive age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1