Bringing a Lens of Equity to Geoscience Qualifying Examinations

IF 8.3 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AGU Advances Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1029/2024AV001260
Lilian A. Dove, Clare E. Singer, Sara E. Murphy
{"title":"Bringing a Lens of Equity to Geoscience Qualifying Examinations","authors":"Lilian A. Dove,&nbsp;Clare E. Singer,&nbsp;Sara E. Murphy","doi":"10.1029/2024AV001260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Qualifying examinations are an important milestone in geoscience graduate programs, but students with marginalized identities are disproportionately lost from graduate programs around the time of these exams. Inequity in qualifying exams can enter at multiple stages throughout the exam design, student mentorship experience, exam administration, and post exam feedback. Therefore, robust assessment is necessary when building an equitable examination. We provide concrete suggestions for graduate programs to evaluate and modify their qualifying examinations. The data-driven and iterative process encourages graduate programs to outline specific expectations for success, employ best-practice pedagogy, proactively support students, and use data to measure progress and inform changes in the examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024AV001260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGU Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024AV001260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qualifying examinations are an important milestone in geoscience graduate programs, but students with marginalized identities are disproportionately lost from graduate programs around the time of these exams. Inequity in qualifying exams can enter at multiple stages throughout the exam design, student mentorship experience, exam administration, and post exam feedback. Therefore, robust assessment is necessary when building an equitable examination. We provide concrete suggestions for graduate programs to evaluate and modify their qualifying examinations. The data-driven and iterative process encourages graduate programs to outline specific expectations for success, employ best-practice pedagogy, proactively support students, and use data to measure progress and inform changes in the examination.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为地球科学资格考试引入公平视角
资格考试是地球科学研究生项目的一个重要里程碑,但在这些考试的前后,具有边缘化身份的学生从研究生项目中流失的比例过高。资格考试中的不公平现象可能出现在考试设计、学生指导经验、考试实施和考后反馈等多个阶段。因此,在设计公平的考试时,有必要进行强有力的评估。我们为研究生项目提供了评估和修改资格考试的具体建议。以数据为导向的迭代过程鼓励研究生项目列出对成功的具体期望,采用最佳实践教学法,积极主动地支持学生,并利用数据来衡量考试的进展情况,为考试的改革提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a Universal Model of Hyporheic Exchange and Nutrient Cycling in Streams Emerging Climate Change Signals in Atmospheric Circulation Evidence for Magnetically-Driven Accretion in the Distal Solar System Substantial Global Radial Variations of Basalt Content Near the 660-km Discontinuity Toward Modeling Continental-Scale Inland Water Carbon Dioxide Emissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1