Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol Among Older Veterans in a Primary Care Setting.

Q2 Medicine Senior Care Pharmacist Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2024.228
Christy Johny Varghese, Mike Grunske, Michael W Nagy
{"title":"Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol Among Older Veterans in a Primary Care Setting.","authors":"Christy Johny Varghese, Mike Grunske, Michael W Nagy","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Recent cardiovascular guideline updates recommend against the use of aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in older people. However, aspirin use remains common in this population. <b>Objective</b> To implement and evaluate the benefit of a pharmacist-driven aspirin deprescribing protocol compared with primary care provider (PCP) education-only in a primary care setting. <b>Methods</b> This prospective, cohort project targeted deprescribing for patients prescribed aspirin for primary prevention of ASCVD. Patients were included if they received primary care services at the Milwaukee Veterans Health Administration Medical Center (VHA) and were 70 years of age or older. Criteria for exclusion were aspirin obtained outside the VHA system, aspirin prescribed for a non-ASCVD-related condition, and/or a history of ASCVD. Active deprescribing by pharmacists and PCP education took place in the intervention group with PCP education only in the standard-of-care group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had aspirin deprescribed in each group. Secondary outcomes included patient acceptability of the intervention and barriers to implementation. <b>Results</b> A total of 520 patients were prescribed aspirin in the intervention group versus 417 in the education-only group. Sixty-five patients met intervention criteria and were contacted for aspirin deprescribing. The pharmacist-led active deprescribing group led to a higher rate of aspirin deprescriptions versus the education-only group (54% vs 18%; <i>P</i> = 0.0001) for patients who met criteria. <b>Conclusion</b> A pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing protocol within a primary care setting significantly decreased the number of aspirin prescriptions compared with PCP education only.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 6","pages":"228-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Recent cardiovascular guideline updates recommend against the use of aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in older people. However, aspirin use remains common in this population. Objective To implement and evaluate the benefit of a pharmacist-driven aspirin deprescribing protocol compared with primary care provider (PCP) education-only in a primary care setting. Methods This prospective, cohort project targeted deprescribing for patients prescribed aspirin for primary prevention of ASCVD. Patients were included if they received primary care services at the Milwaukee Veterans Health Administration Medical Center (VHA) and were 70 years of age or older. Criteria for exclusion were aspirin obtained outside the VHA system, aspirin prescribed for a non-ASCVD-related condition, and/or a history of ASCVD. Active deprescribing by pharmacists and PCP education took place in the intervention group with PCP education only in the standard-of-care group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had aspirin deprescribed in each group. Secondary outcomes included patient acceptability of the intervention and barriers to implementation. Results A total of 520 patients were prescribed aspirin in the intervention group versus 417 in the education-only group. Sixty-five patients met intervention criteria and were contacted for aspirin deprescribing. The pharmacist-led active deprescribing group led to a higher rate of aspirin deprescriptions versus the education-only group (54% vs 18%; P = 0.0001) for patients who met criteria. Conclusion A pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing protocol within a primary care setting significantly decreased the number of aspirin prescriptions compared with PCP education only.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级医疗机构的老年退伍军人中实施以药剂师为主导的阿司匹林停药方案。
背景 最近更新的心血管指南建议老年人不要使用阿司匹林进行动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的一级预防。然而,阿司匹林的使用在这一人群中仍很普遍。目的 在初级医疗机构中实施药剂师驱动的阿司匹林停药方案,并评估该方案与仅由初级保健提供者(PCP)进行教育的方案相比有何益处。方法 该前瞻性队列项目针对开具阿司匹林用于 ASCVD 一级预防的患者进行停药治疗。在密尔沃基退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心 (VHA) 接受初级保健服务且年龄在 70 岁或以上的患者均被纳入该项目。排除标准为:在退伍军人健康管理局系统外获得的阿司匹林、因非心血管疾病相关情况而处方的阿司匹林和/或有心血管疾病史。在干预组中,药剂师主动取消处方并对初级保健医生进行教育,而在标准护理组中仅对初级保健医生进行教育。主要结果是各组中阿司匹林处方的患者比例。次要结果包括患者对干预措施的接受程度和实施障碍。结果 干预组共为 520 名患者开具了阿司匹林处方,而单纯教育组为 417 名。65 名患者符合干预标准,并联系了他们以取消阿司匹林处方。药剂师主导的积极处方组与单纯教育组相比,符合标准的患者阿司匹林处方率更高(54% vs 18%; P = 0.0001)。结论 在初级医疗机构中,由药剂师主导的阿司匹林处方开具方案与仅对初级保健医生进行教育的方案相比,可显著减少阿司匹林处方的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
Co-designing Medication Optimization Patient-Centered Outcomes Research With Older People and Caregivers as Research Partners. Heart Failure Part 3: Diuretic Management in Older People. How Should the Scope of Pharmacy Practice Be Decided? Marsha Meyer PRESIDENT 2024-2025. Notes on the Consultant Pharmacist Practice Model: At Home and Abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1