Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Models for HIV Treatment in Mozambique: a Modelling Study

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of the International AIDS Society Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1002/jia2.26275
Dorlim Antonio Moiana Uetela, Marita Zimmermann, Sérgio Chicumbe, Eduardo Samo Gudo, Ruanne Barnabas, Onei Andre Uetela, Aneth Dinis, Orvalho Augusto, Sandra Gaveta, Aleny Couto, Irénio Gaspar, Hélder Macul, James P. Hughes, Sarah Gimbel, Kenneth Sherr
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Models for HIV Treatment in Mozambique: a Modelling Study","authors":"Dorlim Antonio Moiana Uetela,&nbsp;Marita Zimmermann,&nbsp;Sérgio Chicumbe,&nbsp;Eduardo Samo Gudo,&nbsp;Ruanne Barnabas,&nbsp;Onei Andre Uetela,&nbsp;Aneth Dinis,&nbsp;Orvalho Augusto,&nbsp;Sandra Gaveta,&nbsp;Aleny Couto,&nbsp;Irénio Gaspar,&nbsp;Hélder Macul,&nbsp;James P. Hughes,&nbsp;Sarah Gimbel,&nbsp;Kenneth Sherr","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In 2018, the Mozambique Ministry of Health launched guidelines for implementing differentiated service delivery models (DSDMs) to optimize HIV service delivery, improve retention in care, and ultimately reduce HIV-associated mortality. The models were fast-track, 3-month antiretrovirals dispensing, community antiretroviral therapy groups, adherence clubs, family approach and three one-stop shop models: adolescent-friendly health services, maternal and child health, and tuberculosis. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis to compare these models to conventional services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We constructed a decision tree model based on the percentage of enrolment in each model and the probability of the outcome (12-month retention in treatment) for each year of the study period—three for the cost-effectiveness analysis (2019–2021) and three for the budget impact analysis (2022–2024). Costs for these analyses were primarily estimated per client-year from the health system perspective. A secondary cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the societal perspective. Budget impact analysis costs included antiretrovirals, laboratory tests and service provision interactions. Cost-effectiveness analysis additionally included start-up, training and clients’ opportunity costs. Effectiveness was estimated using an uncontrolled interrupted time series analysis comparing the outcome before and after the implementation of the differentiated models. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify drivers of uncertainty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After implementation of the DSDMs, there was a mean increase of 14.9 percentage points (95% CI: 12.2, 17.8) in 12-month retention, from 47.6% (95% CI, 44.9–50.2) to 62.5% (95% CI, 60.9–64.1). The mean cost difference comparing DSDMs and conventional care was US$ –6 million (173,391,277 vs. 179,461,668) and –32.5 million (394,705,618 vs. 433,232,289) from the health system and the societal perspective, respectively. Therefore, DSDMs dominated conventional care. Results were most sensitive to conventional care interaction costs in the one-way sensitivity analysis. For a population of 1.5 million, the base-case 3-year financial costs associated with the DSDMs was US$550 million, compared with US$564 million for conventional care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DSDMs were less expensive and more effective in retaining clients 12 months after antiretroviral therapy initiation and were estimated to save approximately US$14 million for the health system from 2022 to 2024.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26275","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In 2018, the Mozambique Ministry of Health launched guidelines for implementing differentiated service delivery models (DSDMs) to optimize HIV service delivery, improve retention in care, and ultimately reduce HIV-associated mortality. The models were fast-track, 3-month antiretrovirals dispensing, community antiretroviral therapy groups, adherence clubs, family approach and three one-stop shop models: adolescent-friendly health services, maternal and child health, and tuberculosis. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis to compare these models to conventional services.

Methods

We constructed a decision tree model based on the percentage of enrolment in each model and the probability of the outcome (12-month retention in treatment) for each year of the study period—three for the cost-effectiveness analysis (2019–2021) and three for the budget impact analysis (2022–2024). Costs for these analyses were primarily estimated per client-year from the health system perspective. A secondary cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the societal perspective. Budget impact analysis costs included antiretrovirals, laboratory tests and service provision interactions. Cost-effectiveness analysis additionally included start-up, training and clients’ opportunity costs. Effectiveness was estimated using an uncontrolled interrupted time series analysis comparing the outcome before and after the implementation of the differentiated models. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify drivers of uncertainty.

Results

After implementation of the DSDMs, there was a mean increase of 14.9 percentage points (95% CI: 12.2, 17.8) in 12-month retention, from 47.6% (95% CI, 44.9–50.2) to 62.5% (95% CI, 60.9–64.1). The mean cost difference comparing DSDMs and conventional care was US$ –6 million (173,391,277 vs. 179,461,668) and –32.5 million (394,705,618 vs. 433,232,289) from the health system and the societal perspective, respectively. Therefore, DSDMs dominated conventional care. Results were most sensitive to conventional care interaction costs in the one-way sensitivity analysis. For a population of 1.5 million, the base-case 3-year financial costs associated with the DSDMs was US$550 million, compared with US$564 million for conventional care.

Conclusions

DSDMs were less expensive and more effective in retaining clients 12 months after antiretroviral therapy initiation and were estimated to save approximately US$14 million for the health system from 2022 to 2024.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在莫桑比克实施艾滋病毒治疗差异化服务提供模式的成本效益和预算影响分析:模型研究。
导言:2018 年,莫桑比克卫生部推出了实施差异化服务提供模式(DSDMs)的指导方针,以优化艾滋病服务提供,改善护理保留率,并最终降低艾滋病相关死亡率。这些模式包括快速通道、3 个月抗逆转录病毒药物配发、社区抗逆转录病毒治疗小组、依从性俱乐部、家庭方法和三种一站式服务模式:青少年友好型医疗服务、妇幼保健和结核病。我们对这些模式与传统服务进行了成本效益分析和预算影响分析:我们根据每种模式的注册比例和研究期间每年的结果概率(12 个月的保留治疗)构建了一个决策树模型--成本效益分析(2019-2021 年)和预算影响分析(2022-2024 年)分别为 3 年。这些分析的成本主要是从医疗系统的角度对每名患者每年的成本进行估算。从社会角度进行了二次成本效益分析。预算影响分析的成本包括抗逆转录病毒药物、实验室检测和服务提供互动。成本效益分析还包括启动、培训和客户机会成本。效果估算采用不受控制的间断时间序列分析法,对实施差异化模式前后的结果进行比较。进行了单向敏感性分析,以确定不确定性的驱动因素:实施 DSDM 后,12 个月的保留率平均提高了 14.9 个百分点(95% CI:12.2,17.8),从 47.6%(95% CI:44.9-50.2)提高到 62.5%(95% CI:60.9-64.1)。从卫生系统和社会角度来看,DSDM 与传统治疗的平均成本差异分别为-600 万美元(173,391,277 对 179,461,668 美元)和-3,250 万美元(394,705,618 对 433,232,289 美元)。因此,DSDMs 在常规护理中占主导地位。在单向敏感性分析中,结果对常规护理交互成本最为敏感。在150万人口中,与DSDM相关的基础3年财务成本为5.5亿美元,而传统医疗成本为5.64亿美元:结论:在开始抗逆转录病毒治疗 12 个月后,DSDM 在留住患者方面成本更低,效果更好,估计从 2022 年到 2024 年可为卫生系统节省约 1400 万美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
In-utero exposure to tenofovir-containing pre-exposure prophylaxis and bone mineral content in HIV-unexposed infants in South Africa Patient and public involvement in HIV research: a mapping review and development of an online evidence map Abstract Supplement HIV Glasgow 10–13 November 2024, Glasgow, UK/Virtual Excess mortality attributable to AIDS among people living with HIV in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis Pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation gaps among people vulnerable to HIV acquisition: a cross-sectional analysis in two communities in western Kenya, 2021–2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1