{"title":"Use of biomarkers in clinical trials and future developments that will help identify novel biomarkers.","authors":"Andrea Malaspina","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engineering new solutions for therapeutic benefit in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) has proved a difficult task to accomplish. This is largely the reflection of complexities at multiple levels, that require solutions to improve cost-effectiveness and outcomes. The main obstacle related to the condition's clinical heterogeneity, chiefly the broad difference in survival observed among ALS patients, imposes large populations studies and long follow-up to evaluate any efficacy. The emerging solution is composite clinical and biological parameters enabling prognostic stratification into homogeneous phenotypes for more affordable studies. From a therapeutic development perspective, the choice of a medicinal product requires the availability of treatment-specific biomarkers of target engagement to identify off-target effects based on the compound's putative modality of action. More importantly, there are no established biomarkers of treatment response that can complement clinical outcome measures and support futility and end of treatment analyses of efficacy. Ultimately the onus rests on the development of biomarkers encompassing the unmet needs of clinical trial design, from inclusion to efficacy. These readouts of the pathological process may be used in combination with clinical and paraclinical outcome measured, significantly reducing the time and financial burden of clinical studies. Progress towards a biomarker-driven clinical trial design in ALS has been possible thanks to the accurate detection of neurofilaments and of other immunological mediators in biological fluids with the disease progression, a step change enabling the testing of novel therapeutic agents in a new clinical trial setting. However, further progress remains to be made to find treatment specific target engagement biomarkers along with readouts of treatment response that can be reliably applied to all emerging therapies and clinical studies. Here we will cover the basic notions of biomarker development in ALS clinical trials, the most crucial unanswered questions and the unmet needs in the ALS biomarkers space.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"171-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International review of neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Engineering new solutions for therapeutic benefit in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) has proved a difficult task to accomplish. This is largely the reflection of complexities at multiple levels, that require solutions to improve cost-effectiveness and outcomes. The main obstacle related to the condition's clinical heterogeneity, chiefly the broad difference in survival observed among ALS patients, imposes large populations studies and long follow-up to evaluate any efficacy. The emerging solution is composite clinical and biological parameters enabling prognostic stratification into homogeneous phenotypes for more affordable studies. From a therapeutic development perspective, the choice of a medicinal product requires the availability of treatment-specific biomarkers of target engagement to identify off-target effects based on the compound's putative modality of action. More importantly, there are no established biomarkers of treatment response that can complement clinical outcome measures and support futility and end of treatment analyses of efficacy. Ultimately the onus rests on the development of biomarkers encompassing the unmet needs of clinical trial design, from inclusion to efficacy. These readouts of the pathological process may be used in combination with clinical and paraclinical outcome measured, significantly reducing the time and financial burden of clinical studies. Progress towards a biomarker-driven clinical trial design in ALS has been possible thanks to the accurate detection of neurofilaments and of other immunological mediators in biological fluids with the disease progression, a step change enabling the testing of novel therapeutic agents in a new clinical trial setting. However, further progress remains to be made to find treatment specific target engagement biomarkers along with readouts of treatment response that can be reliably applied to all emerging therapies and clinical studies. Here we will cover the basic notions of biomarker development in ALS clinical trials, the most crucial unanswered questions and the unmet needs in the ALS biomarkers space.
为肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的治疗提供新的解决方案已被证明是一项难以完成的任务。这在很大程度上反映了多个层面的复杂性,需要解决方案来提高成本效益和疗效。主要障碍与该病的临床异质性有关,主要是 ALS 患者的存活率差异很大,这就要求进行大量的人群研究和长期随访,以评估任何疗效。新出现的解决方案是综合临床和生物参数,将预后分层为同质表型,以便进行更经济实惠的研究。从治疗开发的角度来看,要选择一种药物产品,就必须有治疗特异性的靶点参与生物标志物,以便根据化合物的假定作用模式来识别脱靶效应。更重要的是,目前还没有成熟的治疗反应生物标志物来补充临床结果测量,并支持无效和疗效终结分析。归根结底,开发生物标志物的责任在于满足临床试验设计中从纳入到疗效的所有需求。这些病理过程读数可与临床和准临床结果测量相结合使用,从而大大减轻临床研究的时间和经济负担。神经丝杠蛋白和其他免疫介质在生物液体中的精确检测使 ALS 的生物标志物驱动临床试验设计取得了进展。然而,要找到能可靠地应用于所有新兴疗法和临床研究的治疗特异性目标参与生物标记物和治疗反应读数,还有待取得进一步的进展。在此,我们将介绍 ALS 临床试验中生物标记物开发的基本概念、最关键的未决问题以及 ALS 生物标记物领域尚未满足的需求。