Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-10-18DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.07.001
Rosana Camarini, Fábio Cardoso Cruz
Alcohol, the most widely consumed substance globally, can lead to severe adverse effects for both users and those around them. Chronic ethanol consumption may lead to alcohol use disorder (AUD), a chronic relapsing condition characterized by compulsive drinking despite negative consequences. AUD is marked by a high relapse rate among individuals attempting abstinence. Currently, only a few medications, such as disulfiram, naltrexone, nalmefene, and acamprosate, are approved to treat AUD. Moreover, genetic factors and comorbid conditions can significantly influence both the development of AUD and the efficacy of its treatment. This chapter explores the genetic underpinnings of AUD and reviews the main pharmacological treatments available for managing this disorder.
{"title":"Introduction: Approved treatments for alcohol use disorder by regulatory agencies.","authors":"Rosana Camarini, Fábio Cardoso Cruz","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol, the most widely consumed substance globally, can lead to severe adverse effects for both users and those around them. Chronic ethanol consumption may lead to alcohol use disorder (AUD), a chronic relapsing condition characterized by compulsive drinking despite negative consequences. AUD is marked by a high relapse rate among individuals attempting abstinence. Currently, only a few medications, such as disulfiram, naltrexone, nalmefene, and acamprosate, are approved to treat AUD. Moreover, genetic factors and comorbid conditions can significantly influence both the development of AUD and the efficacy of its treatment. This chapter explores the genetic underpinnings of AUD and reviews the main pharmacological treatments available for managing this disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"178 ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-07-25DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.07.002
Javiera Gallardo, Pablo Berríos-Cárcamo, Fernando Ezquer
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is a highly prevalent medical condition characterized by impaired control over alcohol consumption, despite negative consequences on the individual's daily life and health. There is increasing evidence suggesting that chronic alcohol intake, like other addictive drugs, induces neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, disrupting glutamate homeostasis in the main brain areas related to drug addiction. This review explores the potential application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapy for the treatment of AUD. MSCs secrete a broad array of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant molecules, thus, the administration of MSCs, or their secretome, could reduce neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in the brain. These effects correlate with an increase in the expression of the main glutamate transporter, GLT1, which, through the normalization of the extracellular glutamate levels, could mediate the inhibitory effect of MSCs' secretome on chronic alcohol consumption, thus highlighting GLT1 as a central target to reduce chronic alcohol consumption.
{"title":"Mesenchymal stem cells as a promising therapy for alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Javiera Gallardo, Pablo Berríos-Cárcamo, Fernando Ezquer","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2024.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is a highly prevalent medical condition characterized by impaired control over alcohol consumption, despite negative consequences on the individual's daily life and health. There is increasing evidence suggesting that chronic alcohol intake, like other addictive drugs, induces neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, disrupting glutamate homeostasis in the main brain areas related to drug addiction. This review explores the potential application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapy for the treatment of AUD. MSCs secrete a broad array of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant molecules, thus, the administration of MSCs, or their secretome, could reduce neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in the brain. These effects correlate with an increase in the expression of the main glutamate transporter, GLT1, which, through the normalization of the extracellular glutamate levels, could mediate the inhibitory effect of MSCs' secretome on chronic alcohol consumption, thus highlighting GLT1 as a central target to reduce chronic alcohol consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"178 ","pages":"179-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7742(24)00138-7
Rosana Camarini, Fábio C Cruz
{"title":"Preface.","authors":"Rosana Camarini, Fábio C Cruz","doi":"10.1016/S0074-7742(24)00138-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(24)00138-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"178 ","pages":"xix-xxii"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-04DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2023.08.013
Yazead Buhidma, Joana Lama, Susan Duty
Pain is one of the key non-motor symptoms experienced by a large proportion of people living with Parkinson's disease (PD), yet the mechanisms behind this pain remain elusive and as such its treatment remains suboptimal. It is hoped that through the study of animal models of PD, we can start to unravel some of the contributory mechanisms, and perhaps identify models that prove useful as test beds for assessing the efficacy of potential new analgesics. However, just how far along this journey are we right now? Is it even possible to model pain in PD in animal models of the disease? And have we gathered any insight into pain mechanisms from the use of animal models of PD so far? In this chapter we intend to address these questions and in particular highlight the findings generated by others, and our own group, following studies in a range of rodent models of PD.
{"title":"Insight gained from using animal models to study pain in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Yazead Buhidma, Joana Lama, Susan Duty","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2023.08.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.irn.2023.08.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain is one of the key non-motor symptoms experienced by a large proportion of people living with Parkinson's disease (PD), yet the mechanisms behind this pain remain elusive and as such its treatment remains suboptimal. It is hoped that through the study of animal models of PD, we can start to unravel some of the contributory mechanisms, and perhaps identify models that prove useful as test beds for assessing the efficacy of potential new analgesics. However, just how far along this journey are we right now? Is it even possible to model pain in PD in animal models of the disease? And have we gathered any insight into pain mechanisms from the use of animal models of PD so far? In this chapter we intend to address these questions and in particular highlight the findings generated by others, and our own group, following studies in a range of rodent models of PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"174 ","pages":"99-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139716765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.001
Steve Vucic, Mamede de Carvalho, James Bashford, James J P Alix
This chapter describes the role of neurophysiological techniques in diagnosing and monitoring amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Despite many advances, electromyography (EMG) remains a keystone investigation from which to build support for a diagnosis of ALS, demonstrating the pathophysiological processes of motor unit hyperexcitability, denervation and reinnervation. We consider development of the different diagnostic criteria and the role of EMG therein. While not formally recognised by established diagnostic criteria, we discuss the pioneering studies that have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and highlight the growing evidence for TMS in the diagnostic process. Finally, accurately monitoring disease progression is crucial for the successful implementation of clinical trials. Neurophysiological measures of disease state have been incorporated into clinical trials for over 20 years and we review prominent techniques for assessing disease progression.
本章介绍神经生理学技术在诊断和监测肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)中的作用。尽管取得了许多进展,但肌电图(EMG)仍是支持 ALS 诊断的关键检查手段,它能显示运动单位过度兴奋、神经支配和神经再支配的病理生理过程。我们考虑了不同诊断标准的发展以及 EMG 在其中的作用。虽然经颅磁刺激(TMS)未被既定诊断标准正式认可,但我们讨论了证明经颅磁刺激(TMS)对运动皮层诊断潜力的开创性研究,并强调了 TMS 在诊断过程中越来越多的证据。最后,准确监测疾病进展对于临床试验的成功实施至关重要。20 多年来,疾病状态的神经生理学测量已被纳入临床试验,我们将回顾评估疾病进展的主要技术。
{"title":"Contribution of neurophysiology to the diagnosis and monitoring of ALS.","authors":"Steve Vucic, Mamede de Carvalho, James Bashford, James J P Alix","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This chapter describes the role of neurophysiological techniques in diagnosing and monitoring amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Despite many advances, electromyography (EMG) remains a keystone investigation from which to build support for a diagnosis of ALS, demonstrating the pathophysiological processes of motor unit hyperexcitability, denervation and reinnervation. We consider development of the different diagnostic criteria and the role of EMG therein. While not formally recognised by established diagnostic criteria, we discuss the pioneering studies that have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and highlight the growing evidence for TMS in the diagnostic process. Finally, accurately monitoring disease progression is crucial for the successful implementation of clinical trials. Neurophysiological measures of disease state have been incorporated into clinical trials for over 20 years and we review prominent techniques for assessing disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"87-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141159321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-19DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.002
Tobias Moll, Calum Harvey, Elham Alhathli, Sarah Gornall, David O'Brien, Johnathan Cooper-Knock
The majority of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is caused by a complex gene-environment interaction. Despite high estimates of heritability, the genetic basis of disease in the majority of ALS patients are unknown. This limits the development of targeted genetic therapies which require an understanding of patient-specific genetic drivers. There is good evidence that the majority of these missing genetic risk factors are likely to be found within the non-coding genome. However, a major challenge in the discovery of non-coding risk variants is determining which variants are functional in which specific CNS cell type. We summarise current discoveries of ALS-associated genetic drivers within the non-coding genome and we make the case that improved cell-specific annotation of genomic function is required to advance this field, particularly via single-cell epigenetic profiling and spatial transcriptomics. We highlight the example of TBK1 where an apparent paradox exists between pathogenic coding variants which cause loss of protein function, and protective non-coding variants which cause reduced gene expression; the paradox is resolved when it is understood that the non-coding variants are acting primarily via change in gene expression within microglia, and the effect of coding variants is most prominent in neurons. We propose that cell-specific functional annotation of ALS-associated genetic variants will accelerate discovery of the genetic architecture underpinning disease in the vast majority of patients.
大多数肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)是由复杂的基因-环境相互作用引起的。尽管遗传率估计很高,但大多数 ALS 患者的遗传基础尚不清楚。这就限制了靶向基因疗法的开发,而靶向基因疗法需要了解患者的特定基因驱动因素。有充分证据表明,这些缺失的遗传风险因素大部分可能存在于非编码基因组中。然而,发现非编码风险变异的一个主要挑战是确定哪些变异在哪种特定的中枢神经系统细胞类型中具有功能。我们总结了目前在非编码基因组中发现的 ALS 相关遗传驱动因素,并提出需要改进细胞特异性基因组功能注释以推进这一领域的发展,特别是通过单细胞表观遗传学分析和空间转录组学。我们以 TBK1 为例,指出致病编码变异会导致蛋白质功能丧失,而保护性非编码变异会导致基因表达减少,两者之间存在明显的悖论;当了解到非编码变异主要通过改变小胶质细胞内的基因表达发挥作用,而编码变异在神经元中的影响最为突出时,悖论就迎刃而解了。我们建议,对 ALS 相关基因变异的细胞特异性功能注释将加速发现绝大多数患者疾病的基因结构。
{"title":"Non-coding genome contribution to ALS.","authors":"Tobias Moll, Calum Harvey, Elham Alhathli, Sarah Gornall, David O'Brien, Johnathan Cooper-Knock","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is caused by a complex gene-environment interaction. Despite high estimates of heritability, the genetic basis of disease in the majority of ALS patients are unknown. This limits the development of targeted genetic therapies which require an understanding of patient-specific genetic drivers. There is good evidence that the majority of these missing genetic risk factors are likely to be found within the non-coding genome. However, a major challenge in the discovery of non-coding risk variants is determining which variants are functional in which specific CNS cell type. We summarise current discoveries of ALS-associated genetic drivers within the non-coding genome and we make the case that improved cell-specific annotation of genomic function is required to advance this field, particularly via single-cell epigenetic profiling and spatial transcriptomics. We highlight the example of TBK1 where an apparent paradox exists between pathogenic coding variants which cause loss of protein function, and protective non-coding variants which cause reduced gene expression; the paradox is resolved when it is understood that the non-coding variants are acting primarily via change in gene expression within microglia, and the effect of coding variants is most prominent in neurons. We propose that cell-specific functional annotation of ALS-associated genetic variants will accelerate discovery of the genetic architecture underpinning disease in the vast majority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"75-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141159333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chronic pain presents significant personal, psychological, and socioeconomic hurdles, impacting over 30% of adults worldwide and substantially contributing to disability. Unfortunately, current pharmacotherapy often proves inadequate, leaving fewer than 70% of patients with relief. This shortfall has sparked a drive to seek alternative treatments offering superior safety and efficacy profiles. Cannabinoid-based pharmaceuticals, notably cannabidiol (CBD), hold promise in pain management, driven by their natural origins, versatility, and reduced risk of addiction. As we navigate the opioid crisis, ongoing research plunges into CBD's therapeutic potential, buoyed by animal studies revealing its pain-relieving prowess through various system tweaks. However, the efficacy of cannabis in chronic pain management remains a contentious and stigmatized issue. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) presently refrains from endorsing cannabinoid use for pain relief. Nevertheless, evidence indicates their potential in alleviating cancer-related, neuropathic, arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain, necessitating further investigation. Crucially, our comprehension of CBD's role in pain management is a journey still unfolding, with animal studies illustrating its analgesic effects through interactions with the endocannabinoid, inflammatory, and nociceptive systems. As the plot thickens, it's clear: the saga of chronic pain and CBD's potential offers a compelling narrative ripe for further exploration and understanding.
{"title":"Cannabidiol and pain.","authors":"Glauce Crivelaro Nascimento, Daniela Escobar-Espinal, Gabriela Gonçalves Bálico, Nicole Rodrigues Silva, Elaine Del-Bel","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain presents significant personal, psychological, and socioeconomic hurdles, impacting over 30% of adults worldwide and substantially contributing to disability. Unfortunately, current pharmacotherapy often proves inadequate, leaving fewer than 70% of patients with relief. This shortfall has sparked a drive to seek alternative treatments offering superior safety and efficacy profiles. Cannabinoid-based pharmaceuticals, notably cannabidiol (CBD), hold promise in pain management, driven by their natural origins, versatility, and reduced risk of addiction. As we navigate the opioid crisis, ongoing research plunges into CBD's therapeutic potential, buoyed by animal studies revealing its pain-relieving prowess through various system tweaks. However, the efficacy of cannabis in chronic pain management remains a contentious and stigmatized issue. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) presently refrains from endorsing cannabinoid use for pain relief. Nevertheless, evidence indicates their potential in alleviating cancer-related, neuropathic, arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain, necessitating further investigation. Crucially, our comprehension of CBD's role in pain management is a journey still unfolding, with animal studies illustrating its analgesic effects through interactions with the endocannabinoid, inflammatory, and nociceptive systems. As the plot thickens, it's clear: the saga of chronic pain and CBD's potential offers a compelling narrative ripe for further exploration and understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"177 ","pages":"29-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-06-29DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.015
Elaine Del-Bel, Nubia Barros-Pereira, Rafaela Ponciano de Moraes, Bianca Andretto de Mattos, Thaís Antonia Alves-Fernandes, Lorena Borges de Abreu, Glauce Crivelaro Nascimento, Daniela Escobar-Espinal, João Francisco Cordeiro Pedrazzi, Gabrielle Jacob, Bruna A Milan, Gabriela Gonçalves Bálico, Livia Rodrigues Antonieto
Parkinson's disease is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder with no known cure characterized by motor symptoms such as tremors, rigidity, bradykinesia (slowness of movement), and postural instability. Non-motor symptoms like cognitive impairment, mood disturbances, and sleep disorders often accompany the disease. Pharmacological treatments for these symptoms are limited and frequently induce significant adverse reactions, underscoring the necessity for appropriate treatment options. Cannabidiol is a phytocannabinoid devoid of the euphoric and cognitive effects of tetrahydrocannabinol. The study of cannabidiol's pharmacological effects has increased exponentially in recent years. Preclinical and preliminary clinical studies suggest that cannabidiol holds therapeutic potential for alleviating symptoms of Parkinson's disease, offering neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. However, knowledge of cannabidiol neuromolecular mechanisms is limited, and its pharmacology, which appears complex, has not yet been fully elucidated. By examining the evidence, this review aims to provide and synthesize scientifically proven evidence for the potential use of cannabidiol as a novel treatment option for Parkinson's disease. We focus on studies that administrated cannabidiol alone. The results of preclinical trials using cannabidiol in models of Parkinson's disease are encouraging. Nevertheless, drawing firm conclusions on the therapeutic efficacy of cannabidiol for patients is challenging. Cannabidiol doses, formulations, outcome measures, and methodologies vary considerably across studies. Though, cannabidiol holds promise as a novel therapeutic option for managing both motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, offering hope for improved quality of life for affected individuals.
{"title":"A journey through cannabidiol in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Elaine Del-Bel, Nubia Barros-Pereira, Rafaela Ponciano de Moraes, Bianca Andretto de Mattos, Thaís Antonia Alves-Fernandes, Lorena Borges de Abreu, Glauce Crivelaro Nascimento, Daniela Escobar-Espinal, João Francisco Cordeiro Pedrazzi, Gabrielle Jacob, Bruna A Milan, Gabriela Gonçalves Bálico, Livia Rodrigues Antonieto","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder with no known cure characterized by motor symptoms such as tremors, rigidity, bradykinesia (slowness of movement), and postural instability. Non-motor symptoms like cognitive impairment, mood disturbances, and sleep disorders often accompany the disease. Pharmacological treatments for these symptoms are limited and frequently induce significant adverse reactions, underscoring the necessity for appropriate treatment options. Cannabidiol is a phytocannabinoid devoid of the euphoric and cognitive effects of tetrahydrocannabinol. The study of cannabidiol's pharmacological effects has increased exponentially in recent years. Preclinical and preliminary clinical studies suggest that cannabidiol holds therapeutic potential for alleviating symptoms of Parkinson's disease, offering neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. However, knowledge of cannabidiol neuromolecular mechanisms is limited, and its pharmacology, which appears complex, has not yet been fully elucidated. By examining the evidence, this review aims to provide and synthesize scientifically proven evidence for the potential use of cannabidiol as a novel treatment option for Parkinson's disease. We focus on studies that administrated cannabidiol alone. The results of preclinical trials using cannabidiol in models of Parkinson's disease are encouraging. Nevertheless, drawing firm conclusions on the therapeutic efficacy of cannabidiol for patients is challenging. Cannabidiol doses, formulations, outcome measures, and methodologies vary considerably across studies. Though, cannabidiol holds promise as a novel therapeutic option for managing both motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, offering hope for improved quality of life for affected individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"177 ","pages":"65-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a widespread and debilitating condition affecting a significant portion of the global population. Traditional treatment for MDD has primarily involved drugs that increase brain monoamines by inhibiting their uptake or metabolism, which is the basis for the monoaminergic hypothesis of depression. However, these treatments are only partially effective, with many patients experiencing delayed responses, residual symptoms, or complete non-response, rendering the current view of the hypothesis as reductionist. Cannabidiol (CBD) has shown promising results in preclinical models and human studies. Its mechanism is not well-understood, but may involve monoamine and endocannabinoid signaling, control of neuroinflammation and enhanced neuroplasticity. This chapter will explore CBD's effects in preclinical and clinical studies, its molecular mechanisms, and its potential as a treatment for MDD.
{"title":"Therapeutic potential of cannabidiol in depression.","authors":"Matti Bock Guldager, Adriano Maia Chaves Filho, Caroline Biojone, Sâmia Joca","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2024.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a widespread and debilitating condition affecting a significant portion of the global population. Traditional treatment for MDD has primarily involved drugs that increase brain monoamines by inhibiting their uptake or metabolism, which is the basis for the monoaminergic hypothesis of depression. However, these treatments are only partially effective, with many patients experiencing delayed responses, residual symptoms, or complete non-response, rendering the current view of the hypothesis as reductionist. Cannabidiol (CBD) has shown promising results in preclinical models and human studies. Its mechanism is not well-understood, but may involve monoamine and endocannabinoid signaling, control of neuroinflammation and enhanced neuroplasticity. This chapter will explore CBD's effects in preclinical and clinical studies, its molecular mechanisms, and its potential as a treatment for MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"177 ","pages":"251-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.10.004
Angela M Casaril, Caitlyn M Gaffney, Andrew J Shepherd
Animal models continue to be crucial to developing our understanding of the molecular, cellular, and neurophysiological mechanisms that lead to neuropathic pain. The overwhelming majority of animal studies use rodent models, ranging from surgical and trauma-induced models to those induced by metabolic diseases, genetic mutations, viruses, neurotoxic drugs, and cancer. We discuss the clinical relevance of the available models and the pain behavior tests commonly used as outcome measures. Finally, we summarize the refinements that have been proposed to improve the ability of animal model studies to predict clinical efficacy.
{"title":"Animal models of neuropathic pain.","authors":"Angela M Casaril, Caitlyn M Gaffney, Andrew J Shepherd","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2024.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal models continue to be crucial to developing our understanding of the molecular, cellular, and neurophysiological mechanisms that lead to neuropathic pain. The overwhelming majority of animal studies use rodent models, ranging from surgical and trauma-induced models to those induced by metabolic diseases, genetic mutations, viruses, neurotoxic drugs, and cancer. We discuss the clinical relevance of the available models and the pain behavior tests commonly used as outcome measures. Finally, we summarize the refinements that have been proposed to improve the ability of animal model studies to predict clinical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"179 ","pages":"339-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142696259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}