Impact of Risk Stratification in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in a Health System Specialty Pharmacy Setting.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1177/08971900241257293
Mackenzie Stout, Carly Giavatto, Nicholas McDonald, Lauren Bryant, Casey Ross, Casey Fitzpatrick, Jessica Mourani, Ana I Lopez-Medina
{"title":"Impact of Risk Stratification in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in a Health System Specialty Pharmacy Setting.","authors":"Mackenzie Stout, Carly Giavatto, Nicholas McDonald, Lauren Bryant, Casey Ross, Casey Fitzpatrick, Jessica Mourani, Ana I Lopez-Medina","doi":"10.1177/08971900241257293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Integrated pharmacist care into health systems results in significant A1c reduction and improved outcomes in patients with diabetes. However, little is known about the adoption of Health System Specialty Pharmacy (HSSP) chronic disease management (CDM) services within diabetes clinics. Risk stratification is proven to enhance care in various patient populations. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study is to describe how the implementation of risk stratification in the HSSP setting results in optimized patient outcomes in diabetes. <b>Method:</b> This is a retrospective descriptive study reporting the results of expanding the HSSP care model to implement risk stratified CDM services for patients with diabetes. A total of 285 patients were enrolled in the HSSP CDM pharmacy services and were stratified into high- or low-risk groups. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-eight patients were stratified as high-risk with an average baseline A1c of 11.47% and a most recent average of 8.84%. The remaining 285 patients were stratified into the low-risk group. Their average baseline A1c was 7.48% and the last recorded average A1c was 7.15%. Patients not enrolled in HSSP CDM services (N = 100) had a lower reduction in average A1c compared to patients enrolled in the program. <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients stratified into high- and low-risk groups had greater reductions in A1c compared to patients who did not use HSSP CDM services. These results showcase the success of risk stratification and demonstrate the impact HSSP has on patients needing CDM services and outlines a strategy to provide the greatest impact in a high-volume patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241257293","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrated pharmacist care into health systems results in significant A1c reduction and improved outcomes in patients with diabetes. However, little is known about the adoption of Health System Specialty Pharmacy (HSSP) chronic disease management (CDM) services within diabetes clinics. Risk stratification is proven to enhance care in various patient populations. Objective: The objective of this study is to describe how the implementation of risk stratification in the HSSP setting results in optimized patient outcomes in diabetes. Method: This is a retrospective descriptive study reporting the results of expanding the HSSP care model to implement risk stratified CDM services for patients with diabetes. A total of 285 patients were enrolled in the HSSP CDM pharmacy services and were stratified into high- or low-risk groups. Results: Eighty-eight patients were stratified as high-risk with an average baseline A1c of 11.47% and a most recent average of 8.84%. The remaining 285 patients were stratified into the low-risk group. Their average baseline A1c was 7.48% and the last recorded average A1c was 7.15%. Patients not enrolled in HSSP CDM services (N = 100) had a lower reduction in average A1c compared to patients enrolled in the program. Conclusion: Patients stratified into high- and low-risk groups had greater reductions in A1c compared to patients who did not use HSSP CDM services. These results showcase the success of risk stratification and demonstrate the impact HSSP has on patients needing CDM services and outlines a strategy to provide the greatest impact in a high-volume patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗系统专科药房对糖尿病患者进行风险分层的影响。
背景:将药剂师护理纳入医疗系统可显著降低糖尿病患者的 A1c,并改善治疗效果。然而,人们对糖尿病诊所采用医疗系统专科药房(HSSP)慢性病管理(CDM)服务的情况知之甚少。事实证明,风险分层可加强对不同患者群体的护理。研究目的本研究旨在描述在 HSSP 环境中实施风险分层如何优化糖尿病患者的治疗效果。方法:这是一项回顾性描述性研究:这是一项回顾性描述性研究,报告了扩大 HSSP 护理模式,对糖尿病患者实施风险分层 CDM 服务的结果。共有 285 名患者参加了 HSSP CDM 药房服务,并被分为高风险组和低风险组。结果:88 名患者被划分为高风险组,其平均 A1c 基线为 11.47%,最近平均值为 8.84%。其余 285 名患者被分为低风险组。他们的平均基线 A1c 为 7.48%,最近记录的平均 A1c 为 7.15%。未参加 HSSP CDM 服务的患者(N = 100)的平均 A1c 下降率低于参加该计划的患者。结论:与未使用 HSSP CDM 服务的患者相比,分为高风险组和低风险组的患者的 A1c 下降幅度更大。这些结果展示了风险分层的成功,证明了 HSSP 对需要 CDM 服务的患者产生的影响,并概述了在大量患者中产生最大影响的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1