Child–parent agreement on the SDQ: The role of child–parent attachment and parental feelings

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23707
Meirav Hen, Vered Shenaar-Golan, Stav Atia, Uri Yatzkar
{"title":"Child–parent agreement on the SDQ: The role of child–parent attachment and parental feelings","authors":"Meirav Hen,&nbsp;Vered Shenaar-Golan,&nbsp;Stav Atia,&nbsp;Uri Yatzkar","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Children and their parents often provide divergent reports regarding their mental health on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). These discrepancies may impede the diagnostic processes. The present study aimed to explore how a child's attachment to the parent and parental feelings may explain some of the variability between parent's and children's reports on the SDQ.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected using self-report questionnaires from 277 children and their parents (<i>n</i> = 421) who were referred to a public mental health clinic. This information was classified into clinical categories (normal and abnormal) and analyzed using multinomial logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The agreement rates between children and parents on the normality of children were high in general and across gender and age. Insecure attachment to parents positively and significantly predicted the agreement of child and parent reporting abnormality and disagreement when parents reported normality and children reported abnormality. Parental anger positively and significantly predicted disagreement in reports in which parents reported abnormal anger and children reported normal anger.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings highlight the importance of assessing informant variability in association with emotional and relationship variables as clinically meaningful information for a clinical diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"80 9","pages":"2045-2062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.23707","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Children and their parents often provide divergent reports regarding their mental health on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). These discrepancies may impede the diagnostic processes. The present study aimed to explore how a child's attachment to the parent and parental feelings may explain some of the variability between parent's and children's reports on the SDQ.

Methods

Data were collected using self-report questionnaires from 277 children and their parents (n = 421) who were referred to a public mental health clinic. This information was classified into clinical categories (normal and abnormal) and analyzed using multinomial logistic regression.

Results

The agreement rates between children and parents on the normality of children were high in general and across gender and age. Insecure attachment to parents positively and significantly predicted the agreement of child and parent reporting abnormality and disagreement when parents reported normality and children reported abnormality. Parental anger positively and significantly predicted disagreement in reports in which parents reported abnormal anger and children reported normal anger.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the importance of assessing informant variability in association with emotional and relationship variables as clinically meaningful information for a clinical diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童与父母在 SDQ 上的一致性:儿童与父母的依恋和父母情感的作用。
目的:儿童及其父母在优势与困难问卷(SDQ)上提供的有关其心理健康的报告往往存在差异。这些差异可能会妨碍诊断过程。本研究旨在探讨儿童对父母的依恋和父母的感受如何解释父母和儿童在 SDQ 报告中的一些差异:研究使用自我报告问卷收集了 277 名儿童及其父母(n = 421)的数据,这些儿童和父母被转介到一家公共心理健康诊所。这些信息被分为临床类别(正常和异常),并采用多项式逻辑回归法进行分析:儿童和家长对儿童正常与否的意见一致率普遍较高,性别和年龄差异也很大。对父母的不安全依恋对儿童和父母报告异常的一致率和父母报告正常和儿童报告异常的不一致率有显著的正向预测作用。在父母报告异常愤怒和儿童报告正常愤怒的报告中,父母的愤怒对分歧有积极和显著的预测作用:这些发现凸显了评估与情绪和关系变量相关的信息提供者变异性的重要性,这些变异性是对临床诊断有意义的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
Expressive Suppression of Emotions in Bulimia Nervosa: An Electroencephalography Study. ACT for OCD: An Example of ACT and Values-Based Exposures. Strategies for Optimizing Traditional Exposure and Response Prevention: A Case Study Example in an Adolescent With Contamination-Based OCD. Forgiveness in Poland: Rye Forgiveness Scale Adaptation and Its Longitudinal Impact on Mental Health in HIV-Positive Individuals. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1