Assessing circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04656-1
Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, Eimear T Kyle, Kevin J Sweeney, Maeve O'Neill, Charles Gilham, Jacintha O'Sullivan, Grainne O'Kane, Brian Mehigan, Sharon O'Toole, John Larkin, David Gallagher, Paul McCormick, Michael E Kelly
{"title":"Assessing circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, Eimear T Kyle, Kevin J Sweeney, Maeve O'Neill, Charles Gilham, Jacintha O'Sullivan, Grainne O'Kane, Brian Mehigan, Sharon O'Toole, John Larkin, David Gallagher, Paul McCormick, Michael E Kelly","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04656-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker in various cancer types, including locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), offering potential insights into disease progression, treatment response and recurrence. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the utility of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in LARC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Studies investigating the utility of ctDNA in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) were assessed for eligibility. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, ctDNA details and survival data. A meta-analysis was performed on eligible studies to determine pooled recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies involving 1676 participants were included in our analysis. Methodological quality categorised by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was generally satisfactory across included studies. ctDNA detected at various time intervals was generally associated with poor outcomes across included studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled hazard ratio of 8.87 (95% CI 4.91-16.03) and 15.15 (95% CI 8.21-27.95), indicating an increased risk of recurrence with ctDNA positivity in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review provides evidence supporting the prognostic utility of ctDNA in patients with LARC, particularly in identifying patients at higher risk of disease recurrence in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"39 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04656-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker in various cancer types, including locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), offering potential insights into disease progression, treatment response and recurrence. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the utility of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in LARC.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Studies investigating the utility of ctDNA in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) were assessed for eligibility. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, ctDNA details and survival data. A meta-analysis was performed on eligible studies to determine pooled recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results: Twenty-two studies involving 1676 participants were included in our analysis. Methodological quality categorised by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was generally satisfactory across included studies. ctDNA detected at various time intervals was generally associated with poor outcomes across included studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled hazard ratio of 8.87 (95% CI 4.91-16.03) and 15.15 (95% CI 8.21-27.95), indicating an increased risk of recurrence with ctDNA positivity in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods respectively.

Conclusion: Our systematic review provides evidence supporting the prognostic utility of ctDNA in patients with LARC, particularly in identifying patients at higher risk of disease recurrence in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将循环肿瘤 DNA (ctDNA) 作为局部晚期直肠癌的预后生物标志物进行评估:系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)已成为包括局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)在内的多种癌症类型中一种前景广阔的生物标志物,可为疾病进展、治疗反应和复发提供潜在的洞察力。本综述旨在全面评估ctDNA作为LARC预后生物标志物的效用:作为综述的一部分,我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science。我们对调查ctDNA在局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)中应用的研究进行了资格评估。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)偏倚风险工具对纳入的研究进行质量评估。提取的结果包括参与者的基本特征、ctDNA详情和生存数据。对符合条件的研究进行了荟萃分析,以确定无复发生存率(RFS):我们的分析共纳入了22项研究,涉及1676名参与者。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle Ottawa Scale)分类,纳入研究的方法学质量总体上令人满意。在不同时间间隔检测到的ctDNA通常与纳入研究的不良结局相关。Meta分析显示,合并危险比分别为8.87(95% CI 4.91-16.03)和15.15(95% CI 8.21-27.95),表明在新辅助治疗后和术后阶段ctDNA阳性会增加复发风险:我们的系统综述为ctDNA在LARC患者中的预后作用提供了证据支持,特别是在确定新辅助治疗后和术后复发风险较高的患者方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative carbohydrate loading in elective colorectal surgery: postoperative complications and outcomes, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electroacupuncture combined with biofeedback for obstructed defecation syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Clinical utility of the Oakland score in rectal bleeding: Implications for admission decisions and cost efficiency. Risk factors and prediction model for post-polypectomy metachronous colorectal adenoma. Analysis of diverting ileostomy for colorectal cancer surgery: stenosis and T4 invasion are risk factors of reoperation due to anastomotic leakage, even when ileostomy is performed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1