Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, Eimear T Kyle, Kevin J Sweeney, Maeve O'Neill, Charles Gilham, Jacintha O'Sullivan, Grainne O'Kane, Brian Mehigan, Sharon O'Toole, John Larkin, David Gallagher, Paul McCormick, Michael E Kelly
{"title":"Assessing circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, Eimear T Kyle, Kevin J Sweeney, Maeve O'Neill, Charles Gilham, Jacintha O'Sullivan, Grainne O'Kane, Brian Mehigan, Sharon O'Toole, John Larkin, David Gallagher, Paul McCormick, Michael E Kelly","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04656-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker in various cancer types, including locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), offering potential insights into disease progression, treatment response and recurrence. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the utility of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in LARC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Studies investigating the utility of ctDNA in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) were assessed for eligibility. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, ctDNA details and survival data. A meta-analysis was performed on eligible studies to determine pooled recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies involving 1676 participants were included in our analysis. Methodological quality categorised by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was generally satisfactory across included studies. ctDNA detected at various time intervals was generally associated with poor outcomes across included studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled hazard ratio of 8.87 (95% CI 4.91-16.03) and 15.15 (95% CI 8.21-27.95), indicating an increased risk of recurrence with ctDNA positivity in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review provides evidence supporting the prognostic utility of ctDNA in patients with LARC, particularly in identifying patients at higher risk of disease recurrence in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"39 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04656-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker in various cancer types, including locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), offering potential insights into disease progression, treatment response and recurrence. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the utility of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in LARC.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Studies investigating the utility of ctDNA in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) were assessed for eligibility. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, ctDNA details and survival data. A meta-analysis was performed on eligible studies to determine pooled recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Results: Twenty-two studies involving 1676 participants were included in our analysis. Methodological quality categorised by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was generally satisfactory across included studies. ctDNA detected at various time intervals was generally associated with poor outcomes across included studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled hazard ratio of 8.87 (95% CI 4.91-16.03) and 15.15 (95% CI 8.21-27.95), indicating an increased risk of recurrence with ctDNA positivity in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods respectively.
Conclusion: Our systematic review provides evidence supporting the prognostic utility of ctDNA in patients with LARC, particularly in identifying patients at higher risk of disease recurrence in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods.
将循环肿瘤 DNA (ctDNA) 作为局部晚期直肠癌的预后生物标志物进行评估:系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)已成为包括局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)在内的多种癌症类型中一种前景广阔的生物标志物,可为疾病进展、治疗反应和复发提供潜在的洞察力。本综述旨在全面评估ctDNA作为LARC预后生物标志物的效用:作为综述的一部分,我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science。我们对调查ctDNA在局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)中应用的研究进行了资格评估。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)偏倚风险工具对纳入的研究进行质量评估。提取的结果包括参与者的基本特征、ctDNA详情和生存数据。对符合条件的研究进行了荟萃分析,以确定无复发生存率(RFS):我们的分析共纳入了22项研究,涉及1676名参与者。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle Ottawa Scale)分类,纳入研究的方法学质量总体上令人满意。在不同时间间隔检测到的ctDNA通常与纳入研究的不良结局相关。Meta分析显示,合并危险比分别为8.87(95% CI 4.91-16.03)和15.15(95% CI 8.21-27.95),表明在新辅助治疗后和术后阶段ctDNA阳性会增加复发风险:我们的系统综述为ctDNA在LARC患者中的预后作用提供了证据支持,特别是在确定新辅助治疗后和术后复发风险较高的患者方面。