Field of Study and Gender Moderation of the Association of Personality and Math Anxiety with Numeracy.

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1080/00223980.2024.2352706
Maristella Lunardon, Tania Cerni, Raffaella Ida Rumiati
{"title":"Field of Study and Gender Moderation of the Association of Personality and Math Anxiety with Numeracy.","authors":"Maristella Lunardon, Tania Cerni, Raffaella Ida Rumiati","doi":"10.1080/00223980.2024.2352706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Math anxiety and personality influence numeracy, although the nature of their contribution has been overlooked. In the present study, we investigated whether their association with numeracy depended on field of study and gender in higher education. Participants were Italian undergraduates in either the humanities (<i>N</i> = 201) or Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM; <i>N</i> = 209) fields of study. These participants remotely completed standardized tests assessing numeracy, math anxiety, personality, intelligence, and basic numerical skills. We tested whether math anxiety and personality interacted with field of study and gender in predicting numeracy. Results showed that math anxiety was negatively associated with numeracy independently of field of study and gender, while the effect of personality, especially neuroticism, on numeracy interacted with field of study over and above intelligence and basic numerical skills. Specifically, humanities undergraduates with higher neuroticism levels scored lower in numeracy than STEM undergraduates. These findings underscore the importance of emotional experience for a good performance in mathematics, beyond math anxiety and the other personality traits, in the students that are less familiar with mathematics. Finally, no robust gender moderation emerged, suggesting that its role may be overridden by differences associated with career choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2352706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Math anxiety and personality influence numeracy, although the nature of their contribution has been overlooked. In the present study, we investigated whether their association with numeracy depended on field of study and gender in higher education. Participants were Italian undergraduates in either the humanities (N = 201) or Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM; N = 209) fields of study. These participants remotely completed standardized tests assessing numeracy, math anxiety, personality, intelligence, and basic numerical skills. We tested whether math anxiety and personality interacted with field of study and gender in predicting numeracy. Results showed that math anxiety was negatively associated with numeracy independently of field of study and gender, while the effect of personality, especially neuroticism, on numeracy interacted with field of study over and above intelligence and basic numerical skills. Specifically, humanities undergraduates with higher neuroticism levels scored lower in numeracy than STEM undergraduates. These findings underscore the importance of emotional experience for a good performance in mathematics, beyond math anxiety and the other personality traits, in the students that are less familiar with mathematics. Finally, no robust gender moderation emerged, suggesting that its role may be overridden by differences associated with career choice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习领域和性别对人格和数学焦虑与计算能力关系的调节作用。
数学焦虑和个性会影响计算能力,但其影响的性质一直被忽视。在本研究中,我们调查了它们与计算能力的关系是否取决于高等教育中的学习领域和性别。研究对象为人文学科(201 人)或科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM,209 人)专业的意大利本科生。这些参与者远程完成了评估计算能力、数学焦虑、个性、智力和基本计算技能的标准化测试。我们测试了数学焦虑和个性在预测计算能力方面是否与学习领域和性别相互影响。结果表明,数学焦虑与计算能力呈负相关,与所学专业和性别无关,而人格,尤其是神经质,对计算能力的影响则与所学专业有关,与智力和基本计算技能无关。具体来说,神经质程度较高的人文学科本科生的计算能力得分低于理工科本科生。这些发现强调了情感体验对于数学成绩的重要性,而不是数学焦虑和其他人格特质。最后,没有出现显著的性别调节作用,这表明其作用可能被与职业选择相关的差异所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychology
Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychology is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes empirical research and theoretical articles in applied areas of psychology, including: Behavioral Psychology Clinical Psychology Cognitive Psychology Counseling Psychology Cultural Psychology Economic Psychology Educational Psychology Environmental Psychology Ethics in Psychology Family Psychology and Couples Psychology Forensic Psychology Health Psychology Industrial and Personnel Psychology Managerial and Leadership Psychology Measurement/Assessment Professional Practice Psychology of Religion Psychotherapy School Psychology Social Psychology Sport Psychology Work, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
期刊最新文献
Dual Effects of Self-Compassion on Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Posttraumatic Growth: The Roles of Trauma-Related Shame and Guilt. Machiavellianism: Psychological, Clinical, and Neural Correlations. An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emotion Regulation and Emotional Labor. Family Function and Problematic Social Media Use Among Adolescents in Vocational Schools: A Moderated Mediation Model. Superhero Films' Impacts on Prosocial Behavior: The Mediating Role of State-Empathy and Violence Justification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1