Evaluating health information systems-related errors using the human, organization, process, technology-fit (HOPT-fit) framework.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582241252763
Maryati Mohd Yusof, Toshihiro Takeda, Yoshie Shimai, Naoki Mihara, Yasuhsi Matsumura
{"title":"Evaluating health information systems-related errors using the human, organization, process, technology-fit (HOPT-fit) framework.","authors":"Maryati Mohd Yusof, Toshihiro Takeda, Yoshie Shimai, Naoki Mihara, Yasuhsi Matsumura","doi":"10.1177/14604582241252763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complex socio-technical health information systems (HIS) issues can create new error risks. Therefore, we evaluated the management of HIS-related errors using the proposed human, organization, process, and technology-fit framework to identify the lessons learned. Qualitative case study methodology through observation, interview, and document analysis was conducted at a 1000-bed Japanese specialist teaching hospital. Effective management of HIS-related errors was attributable to many socio-technical factors including continuous improvement, safety culture, strong management and leadership, effective communication, preventive and corrective mechanisms, an incident reporting system, and closed feedback loops. Enablers of medication errors include system sophistication and process factors like workarounds, variance, clinical workload, slips and mistakes, and miscommunication. The case management effectiveness in handling the HIS-related errors can guide other clinical settings. The potential of HIS to minimize errors can be achieved through continual, systematic, and structured evaluation. The case study validated the applicability of the proposed evaluation framework that can be applied flexibly according to study contexts to inform HIS stakeholders in decision-making. The comprehensive and specific measures of the proposed framework and approach can be a useful guide for evaluating complex HIS-related errors. Leaner and fitter socio-technical components of HIS can yield safer system use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 2","pages":"14604582241252763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241252763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Complex socio-technical health information systems (HIS) issues can create new error risks. Therefore, we evaluated the management of HIS-related errors using the proposed human, organization, process, and technology-fit framework to identify the lessons learned. Qualitative case study methodology through observation, interview, and document analysis was conducted at a 1000-bed Japanese specialist teaching hospital. Effective management of HIS-related errors was attributable to many socio-technical factors including continuous improvement, safety culture, strong management and leadership, effective communication, preventive and corrective mechanisms, an incident reporting system, and closed feedback loops. Enablers of medication errors include system sophistication and process factors like workarounds, variance, clinical workload, slips and mistakes, and miscommunication. The case management effectiveness in handling the HIS-related errors can guide other clinical settings. The potential of HIS to minimize errors can be achieved through continual, systematic, and structured evaluation. The case study validated the applicability of the proposed evaluation framework that can be applied flexibly according to study contexts to inform HIS stakeholders in decision-making. The comprehensive and specific measures of the proposed framework and approach can be a useful guide for evaluating complex HIS-related errors. Leaner and fitter socio-technical components of HIS can yield safer system use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人、组织、流程、技术匹配(HOPT-fit)框架评估与医疗信息系统相关的错误。
复杂的社会-技术医疗信息系统(HIS)问题会带来新的错误风险。因此,我们采用所提出的人力、组织、流程和技术匹配框架,对 HIS 相关错误的管理进行了评估,以总结经验教训。我们在一家拥有 1000 张床位的日本专科教学医院,通过观察、访谈和文件分析等方法进行了定性案例研究。HIS 相关错误的有效管理归功于许多社会技术因素,包括持续改进、安全文化、强有力的管理和领导、有效沟通、预防和纠正机制、事故报告系统和闭合反馈回路。导致用药错误的因素包括系统的先进性和流程因素,如变通方法、差异、临床工作量、滑倒和失误以及沟通不畅。病例管理在处理 HIS 相关错误方面的有效性可以为其他临床环境提供指导。通过持续、系统和结构化的评估,可以发挥 HIS 的潜力,最大限度地减少错误。案例研究验证了所建议的评估框架的适用性,该框架可根据研究背景灵活应用,为 HIS 利益相关者提供决策依据。建议的框架和方法的全面性和具体措施可以为评估复杂的 HIS 相关错误提供有用的指导。更精简、更合适的 HIS 社会技术组件可使系统使用更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Empowering healthcare education: A multilingual ontology for medical informatics and digital health (MIMO) integrated to artificial intelligence powered training in smart hospitals. Analysis of health recommendations using longitudinal quality of life data: QoL@TbA - A transformer-based approach. Analysis of total RNA as a potential biomarker of developmental neurotoxicity in silico. Characterizing pituitary adenomas in clinical notes: Corpus construction and its application in LLMs. HealthCheck: A method for evaluating persuasive mobile health applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1