Nurses' Use of mHealth Apps for Chronic Conditions: Cross-Sectional Survey.

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.2196/57668
Wa'ed Shiyab, Kaye Rolls, Caleb Ferguson, Elizabeth Halcomb
{"title":"Nurses' Use of mHealth Apps for Chronic Conditions: Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Wa'ed Shiyab, Kaye Rolls, Caleb Ferguson, Elizabeth Halcomb","doi":"10.2196/57668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) is increasingly used to support public health practice, as it has positive benefits such as enhancing self-efficacy and facilitating chronic disease management. Yet, relatively few studies have explored the use of mHealth apps among nurses, despite their important role in caring for patients with and at risk of chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to explore nurses' use of mHealth apps to support adults with or at risk of chronic conditions and understand the factors that influence technology adoption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between September 2022 and January 2023. The survey was shared via social media and professional nursing organizations to Australian nurses caring for adults with or at risk of chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 158 responses were included in the analysis. More than two-thirds (n=108, 68.4%) of respondents reported that they personally used at least 1 mHealth app. Over half (n=83, 52.5% to n=108, 68.4%) reported they use mHealth apps at least a few times a month for clinical purposes. Logistic regression demonstrated that performance expectancy (P=.04), facilitating condition (P=.05), and personal use of mHealth apps (P=.05) were significantly associated with mHealth app recommendation. In contrast, effort expectancy (P=.09) and social influence (P=.46) did not have a significant influence on whether respondents recommended mHealth apps to patients. The inability to identify the quality of mHealth apps and the lack of access to mobile devices or internet were the most common barriers to mHealth app recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While nurses use mHealth apps personally, there is potential to increase their clinical application. Given the challenges reported in appraising and assessing mHealth apps, app regulation and upskilling nurses will help to integrate mHealth apps into usual patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"7 ","pages":"e57668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11170041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) is increasingly used to support public health practice, as it has positive benefits such as enhancing self-efficacy and facilitating chronic disease management. Yet, relatively few studies have explored the use of mHealth apps among nurses, despite their important role in caring for patients with and at risk of chronic conditions.

Objective: The aim of the study is to explore nurses' use of mHealth apps to support adults with or at risk of chronic conditions and understand the factors that influence technology adoption.

Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between September 2022 and January 2023. The survey was shared via social media and professional nursing organizations to Australian nurses caring for adults with or at risk of chronic conditions.

Results: A total of 158 responses were included in the analysis. More than two-thirds (n=108, 68.4%) of respondents reported that they personally used at least 1 mHealth app. Over half (n=83, 52.5% to n=108, 68.4%) reported they use mHealth apps at least a few times a month for clinical purposes. Logistic regression demonstrated that performance expectancy (P=.04), facilitating condition (P=.05), and personal use of mHealth apps (P=.05) were significantly associated with mHealth app recommendation. In contrast, effort expectancy (P=.09) and social influence (P=.46) did not have a significant influence on whether respondents recommended mHealth apps to patients. The inability to identify the quality of mHealth apps and the lack of access to mobile devices or internet were the most common barriers to mHealth app recommendation.

Conclusions: While nurses use mHealth apps personally, there is potential to increase their clinical application. Given the challenges reported in appraising and assessing mHealth apps, app regulation and upskilling nurses will help to integrate mHealth apps into usual patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士使用移动医疗应用程序治疗慢性病:跨部门调查
背景:移动医疗(mHealth)被越来越多地用于支持公共卫生实践,因为它具有提高自我效能和促进慢性病管理等积极益处。然而,尽管护士在护理慢性病患者和有慢性病风险的患者方面发挥着重要作用,但探讨护士使用移动医疗应用程序的研究却相对较少:本研究旨在探讨护士使用移动医疗应用程序为慢性病患者或有慢性病风险的成年人提供支持的情况,并了解影响技术应用的因素:在 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 1 月期间进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查。该调查通过社交媒体和专业护理组织分享给为患有慢性病或有慢性病风险的成年人提供护理的澳大利亚护士:共有 158 份回复纳入分析。超过三分之二的受访者(n=108,68.4%)表示他们个人至少使用过一款移动医疗应用程序。超过一半的受访者(n=83,52.5% 至 n=108,68.4%)称他们每月至少使用几次移动医疗应用程序用于临床目的。逻辑回归表明,绩效预期(P=.04)、便利条件(P=.05)和移动医疗应用程序的个人使用(P=.05)与移动医疗应用程序推荐显著相关。相比之下,努力预期(P=.09)和社会影响(P=.46)对受访者是否向患者推荐移动医疗应用程序没有明显影响。无法识别移动医疗应用程序的质量以及无法访问移动设备或互联网是推荐移动医疗应用程序最常见的障碍:尽管护士个人使用移动医疗应用程序,但仍有潜力提高其临床应用。鉴于在鉴定和评估移动医疗应用程序方面所面临的挑战,应用程序监管和提高护士技能将有助于将移动医疗应用程序纳入常规患者护理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unobtrusive Nighttime Movement Monitoring to Support Nursing Home Continence Care: Algorithm Development and Validation Study. Educators' perceptions and experiences of online teaching to foster caring professions students' development of virtual caring skills: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Assessing Visitor Expectations of AI Nursing Robots in Hospital Settings: Cross-Sectional Study Using the Kano Model. Calculating Optimal Patient to Nursing Capacity: Comparative Analysis of Traditional and New Methods. Remote Patient Monitoring at Home in Patients With COVID-19: Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1