Applicability of an unsupervised cluster model developed on first wave COVID-19 patients in second/third wave critically ill patients

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Medicina Intensiva Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2024.02.006
Alejandro Rodríguez , Josep Gómez , Álvaro Franquet , Sandra Trefler , Emili Díaz , Jordi Sole-Violán , Rafael Zaragoza , Elisabeth Papiol , Borja Suberviola , Montserrat Vallverdú , María Jimenez-Herrera , Antonio Albaya-Moreno , Alfonso Canabal Berlanga , María del Valle Ortíz , Juan Carlos Ballesteros , Lucía López Amor , Susana Sancho Chinesta , Maria de Alba-Aparicio , Angel Estella , Ignacio Martín-Loeches , María Bodi
{"title":"Applicability of an unsupervised cluster model developed on first wave COVID-19 patients in second/third wave critically ill patients","authors":"Alejandro Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Josep Gómez ,&nbsp;Álvaro Franquet ,&nbsp;Sandra Trefler ,&nbsp;Emili Díaz ,&nbsp;Jordi Sole-Violán ,&nbsp;Rafael Zaragoza ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Papiol ,&nbsp;Borja Suberviola ,&nbsp;Montserrat Vallverdú ,&nbsp;María Jimenez-Herrera ,&nbsp;Antonio Albaya-Moreno ,&nbsp;Alfonso Canabal Berlanga ,&nbsp;María del Valle Ortíz ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Ballesteros ,&nbsp;Lucía López Amor ,&nbsp;Susana Sancho Chinesta ,&nbsp;Maria de Alba-Aparicio ,&nbsp;Angel Estella ,&nbsp;Ignacio Martín-Loeches ,&nbsp;María Bodi","doi":"10.1016/j.medin.2024.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate the unsupervised cluster model (USCM) developed during the first pandemic wave in a cohort of critically ill patients from the second and third pandemic waves.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, retrospective, multicentre study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Intensive Care Unit (ICU).</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 and respiratory failure during the second and third pandemic waves.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Collected data included demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory tests and ICU outcomes. To validate our original USCM, we assigned a phenotype to each patient of the validation cohort. The performance of the classification was determined by Silhouette coefficient (SC) and general linear modelling. In a post-hoc analysis we developed and validated a USCM specific to the validation set. The model’s performance was measured using accuracy test and area under curve (AUC) ROC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2330 patients (mean age 63 [53–82] years, 1643 (70.5%) male, median APACHE II score (12 [9–16]) and SOFA score (4 [3–6]) were included. The ICU mortality was 27.2%. The USCM classified patients into 3 clinical phenotypes: A (n = 1206 patients, 51.8%); B (n = 618 patients, 26.5%), and C (n = 506 patients, 21.7%). The characteristics of patients within each phenotype were significantly different from the original population. The SC was −0.007 and the inclusion of phenotype classification in a regression model did not improve the model performance (0.79 and 0.78 ROC for original and validation model). The post-hoc model performed better than the validation model (SC −0.08).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Models developed using machine learning techniques during the first pandemic wave cannot be applied with adequate performance to patients admitted in subsequent waves without prior validation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49268,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Intensiva","volume":"48 6","pages":"Pages 326-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569124000640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To validate the unsupervised cluster model (USCM) developed during the first pandemic wave in a cohort of critically ill patients from the second and third pandemic waves.

Design

Observational, retrospective, multicentre study.

Setting

Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Patients

Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 and respiratory failure during the second and third pandemic waves.

Interventions

None.

Main variables of interest

Collected data included demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory tests and ICU outcomes. To validate our original USCM, we assigned a phenotype to each patient of the validation cohort. The performance of the classification was determined by Silhouette coefficient (SC) and general linear modelling. In a post-hoc analysis we developed and validated a USCM specific to the validation set. The model’s performance was measured using accuracy test and area under curve (AUC) ROC.

Results

A total of 2330 patients (mean age 63 [53–82] years, 1643 (70.5%) male, median APACHE II score (12 [9–16]) and SOFA score (4 [3–6]) were included. The ICU mortality was 27.2%. The USCM classified patients into 3 clinical phenotypes: A (n = 1206 patients, 51.8%); B (n = 618 patients, 26.5%), and C (n = 506 patients, 21.7%). The characteristics of patients within each phenotype were significantly different from the original population. The SC was −0.007 and the inclusion of phenotype classification in a regression model did not improve the model performance (0.79 and 0.78 ROC for original and validation model). The post-hoc model performed better than the validation model (SC −0.08).

Conclusion

Models developed using machine learning techniques during the first pandemic wave cannot be applied with adequate performance to patients admitted in subsequent waves without prior validation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对第一波 COVID-19 患者开发的无监督聚类模型在第二/第三波重症患者中的适用性
设计观察性、回顾性、多中心研究.设置重症监护室(ICU).患者第二和第三次大流行期间因 COVID-19 和呼吸衰竭入院的成人患者.干预措施无.主要关注变量收集的数据包括人口统计学和临床特征、合并症、实验室检查和 ICU 结果。为了验证我们最初的 USCM,我们为验证队列中的每位患者分配了一个表型。通过剪影系数(SC)和一般线性建模确定了分类的性能。在事后分析中,我们开发并验证了专门针对验证集的 USCM。结果 共纳入 2330 名患者(平均年龄 63 [53-82] 岁,男性 1643 (70.5%),中位 APACHE II 评分 (12 [9-16]) 和 SOFA 评分 (4 [3-6])。ICU 死亡率为 27.2%。USCM 将患者分为 3 种临床表型:A(1206 人,占 51.8%)、B(618 人,占 26.5%)和 C(506 人,占 21.7%)。各表型患者的特征与原始人群有显著差异。SC值为-0.007,将表型分类纳入回归模型并未提高模型性能(原始模型和验证模型的ROC分别为0.79和0.78)。结论 在没有事先验证的情况下,在第一波大流行期间使用机器学习技术开发的模型无法充分应用于随后几波大流行中收治的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Intensiva
Medicina Intensiva CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Medicina Intensiva is the journal of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and of Pan American and Iberian Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Medicina Intensiva has become the reference publication in Spanish in its field. The journal mainly publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Clinical Notes, Consensus Documents, Images, and other information relevant to the specialty. All works go through a rigorous selection process. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages. The journal follows the publication requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Nutrithorax: an uncommon differential diagnosis of the plankton sign Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in a burns unit reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired infections: A retrospective before-and-after cohort study Implications of opioid-sparing medications in critically ill patients: A scoping review Stress relaxation, another cause of “Pseudo auto-PEEP”? In-hospital cardiac arrest simulation program in a cardiopulmonary critical care unit: A pilot experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1