To Abate, or Not to Abate? The Arising of the Win–Win Solution Under Time Consistent Emission Taxation

Elettra Agliardi, Luca Lambertini
{"title":"To Abate, or Not to Abate? The Arising of the Win–Win Solution Under Time Consistent Emission Taxation","authors":"Elettra Agliardi, Luca Lambertini","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00879-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We analyse a model of environmental regulation where two firms can optimally decide to invest in an emission abatement technology and the regulator taxes firms’ emissions in a time-consistent manner. Depending on the values of the parameters measuring the extent of emission abatement that firms may achieve and the degree of product differentiation, we characterize the subgame perfect equilibria, developing all admissible scenarios where either both firms invest in abatement technologies, none of them do, or just one does, and show the conditions under which a win-win solution emerges, validating a strong form of Porter hypothesis. We also extend the main result to the oligopoly game with a generic number of firms.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00879-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyse a model of environmental regulation where two firms can optimally decide to invest in an emission abatement technology and the regulator taxes firms’ emissions in a time-consistent manner. Depending on the values of the parameters measuring the extent of emission abatement that firms may achieve and the degree of product differentiation, we characterize the subgame perfect equilibria, developing all admissible scenarios where either both firms invest in abatement technologies, none of them do, or just one does, and show the conditions under which a win-win solution emerges, validating a strong form of Porter hypothesis. We also extend the main result to the oligopoly game with a generic number of firms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减税,还是不减税?时间一致性排放税下双赢方案的出现
我们分析了一个环境监管模型,在该模型中,两家公司可以最优化地决定投资减排技术,而监管机构则以时间一致的方式对公司的排放征税。根据衡量企业减排程度和产品差异化程度的参数值,我们描述了子博弈完美均衡的特征,提出了所有可能出现的情况:要么两家企业都投资减排技术,要么两家企业都不投资,要么只有一家企业投资,并展示了出现双赢方案的条件,验证了强形式的波特假设。我们还将主要结果扩展到具有一般企业数量的寡头垄断博弈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Local Governments Set Climate Targets: Effects of City Size and Political Costs A Lost Opportunity? Environmental Investment Tax Incentive and Energy Efficient Technologies Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap: Policy Assessment Carbon Leakage from Fuel Taxes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Exogenous Hazard Rates and Precautionary Behaviour in Resource Economic Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1