Understanding the Influence of Single Bias Reduction Strategies on Personal and Systemic Bias Outcomes

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1177/13684302241252406
Elisabeth S. Noland, Margo J. Monteith
{"title":"Understanding the Influence of Single Bias Reduction Strategies on Personal and Systemic Bias Outcomes","authors":"Elisabeth S. Noland, Margo J. Monteith","doi":"10.1177/13684302241252406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social psychological research has used strategies to increase recognition of and motivation to combat personal or systemic bias, but with little attention to whether single strategies might influence both personal and systemic outcomes. We investigated whether single strategies are effective in both bias domains and potential underlying mechanisms. Across two experiments, non-Black participants were exposed to information concerning (a) their personal racial biases, (b) multiple Black individuals’ discrimination experiences across institutional contexts, or (c) race-unrelated information (control condition). Discrimination experiences exposure (vs. control) increased recognition of systemic bias and motivation to combat both systemic and personal bias (Studies 1 and 2), and we found statistical support for empathy as a mediator (Study 2). In contrast, strategies for highlighting personal bias had weaker effects on personal bias outcomes and no effects on systemic bias outcomes. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of discrimination experiences exposure for combatting systemic and personal bias.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241252406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social psychological research has used strategies to increase recognition of and motivation to combat personal or systemic bias, but with little attention to whether single strategies might influence both personal and systemic outcomes. We investigated whether single strategies are effective in both bias domains and potential underlying mechanisms. Across two experiments, non-Black participants were exposed to information concerning (a) their personal racial biases, (b) multiple Black individuals’ discrimination experiences across institutional contexts, or (c) race-unrelated information (control condition). Discrimination experiences exposure (vs. control) increased recognition of systemic bias and motivation to combat both systemic and personal bias (Studies 1 and 2), and we found statistical support for empathy as a mediator (Study 2). In contrast, strategies for highlighting personal bias had weaker effects on personal bias outcomes and no effects on systemic bias outcomes. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of discrimination experiences exposure for combatting systemic and personal bias.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解减少单一偏见策略对个人和系统偏见结果的影响
社会心理学研究采用了一些策略来提高人们对个人或系统偏见的认识,并激发人们消除偏见的动力,但很少关注单一策略是否会同时影响个人和系统的结果。我们研究了单一策略是否在两个偏见领域都有效,以及潜在的内在机制。在两个实验中,非黑人参与者被暴露于以下信息中:(a)他们个人的种族偏见;(b)多个黑人在不同机构背景下受到歧视的经历;或(c)与种族无关的信息(对照条件)。接触歧视经历(与对照组相比)提高了对制度性偏见的认识,也增强了消除制度性偏见和个人偏见的动力(研究 1 和 2),我们还发现共情作为中介的统计支持(研究 2)。相比之下,强调个人偏见的策略对个人偏见结果的影响较弱,而对系统偏见结果没有影响。我们讨论了接触歧视经历对消除系统性偏见和个人偏见的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations is a scientific social psychology journal dedicated to research on social psychological processes within and between groups. It provides a forum for and is aimed at researchers and students in social psychology and related disciples (e.g., organizational and management sciences, political science, sociology, language and communication, cross cultural psychology, international relations) that have a scientific interest in the social psychology of human groups. The journal has an extensive editorial team that includes many if not most of the leading scholars in social psychology of group processes and intergroup relations from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Friendship networks predict girls' STEM fit and interest through subjective belonging. Narrow prototypes of Asian subgroups in the United States: Implications for the Stop Asian Hate movement. The psychology of criminal authority: Introducing the Legitimacy of Secret Power Scale. An investigation of how gender shapes the appearance and judgment of apologetic faces. Examining the impact of learning about a resolved conflict on attitudes in an ongoing conflict: Evidence from the Israeli-Palestinian context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1