Targeting Gαi2 in neutrophils protects from myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Basic Research in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1007/s00395-024-01057-x
David Köhler, Veronika Leiss, Lukas Beichert, Simon Killinger, Daniela Grothe, Ragini Kushwaha, Agnes Schröter, Anna Roslan, Claudia Eggstein, Jule Focken, Tiago Granja, Vasudharani Devanathan, Birgit Schittek, Robert Lukowski, Bettina Weigelin, Peter Rosenberger, Bernd Nürnberg, Sandra Beer-Hammer
{"title":"Targeting Gα<sub>i2</sub> in neutrophils protects from myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury.","authors":"David Köhler, Veronika Leiss, Lukas Beichert, Simon Killinger, Daniela Grothe, Ragini Kushwaha, Agnes Schröter, Anna Roslan, Claudia Eggstein, Jule Focken, Tiago Granja, Vasudharani Devanathan, Birgit Schittek, Robert Lukowski, Bettina Weigelin, Peter Rosenberger, Bernd Nürnberg, Sandra Beer-Hammer","doi":"10.1007/s00395-024-01057-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neutrophils are not only involved in immune defense against infection but also contribute to the exacerbation of tissue damage after ischemia and reperfusion. We have previously shown that genetic ablation of regulatory Gα<sub>i</sub> proteins in mice has both protective and deleterious effects on myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury (mIRI), depending on which isoform is deleted. To deepen and analyze these findings in more detail the contribution of Gα<sub>i2</sub> proteins in resident cardiac vs circulating blood cells for mIRI was first studied in bone marrow chimeras. In fact, the absence of Gα<sub>i2</sub> in all blood cells reduced the extent of mIRI (22,9% infarct size of area at risk (AAR) Gnai2<sup>-/-</sup> → wt vs 44.0% wt → wt; p < 0.001) whereas the absence of Gα<sub>i2</sub> in non-hematopoietic cells increased the infarct damage (66.5% wt → Gnai2<sup>-/-</sup> vs 44.0% wt → wt; p < 0.001). Previously we have reported the impact of platelet Gα<sub>i2</sub> for mIRI. Here, we show that infarct size was substantially reduced when Gα<sub>i2</sub> signaling was either genetically ablated in neutrophils/macrophages using LysM-driven Cre recombinase (AAR: 17.9% Gnai2<sup>fl/fl</sup> LysM-Cre<sup>+/tg</sup> vs 42.0% Gnai2<sup>fl/fl</sup>; p < 0.01) or selectively blocked with specific antibodies directed against Gα<sub>i2</sub> (AAR: 19.0% (anti-Gα<sub>i2</sub>) vs 49.0% (IgG); p < 0.001). In addition, the number of platelet-neutrophil complexes (PNCs) in the infarcted area were reduced in both, genetically modified (PNCs: 18 (Gnai2<sup>fl/fl</sup>; LysM-Cre<sup>+/tg</sup>) vs 31 (Gnai2<sup>fl/fl</sup>); p < 0.001) and in anti-Gα<sub>i2</sub> antibody-treated (PNCs: 9 (anti-Gα<sub>i2</sub>) vs 33 (IgG); p < 0.001) mice. Of note, significant infarct-limiting effects were achieved with a single anti-Gα<sub>i2</sub> antibody challenge immediately prior to vessel reperfusion without affecting bleeding time, heart rate or cellular distribution of neutrophils. Finally, anti-Gα<sub>i2</sub> antibody treatment also inhibited transendothelial migration of human neutrophils (25,885 (IgG) vs 13,225 (anti-Gα<sub>i2</sub>) neutrophils; p < 0.001), collectively suggesting that a therapeutic concept of functional Gα<sub>i2</sub> inhibition during thrombolysis and reperfusion in patients with myocardial infarction should be further considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8723,"journal":{"name":"Basic Research in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-024-01057-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neutrophils are not only involved in immune defense against infection but also contribute to the exacerbation of tissue damage after ischemia and reperfusion. We have previously shown that genetic ablation of regulatory Gαi proteins in mice has both protective and deleterious effects on myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury (mIRI), depending on which isoform is deleted. To deepen and analyze these findings in more detail the contribution of Gαi2 proteins in resident cardiac vs circulating blood cells for mIRI was first studied in bone marrow chimeras. In fact, the absence of Gαi2 in all blood cells reduced the extent of mIRI (22,9% infarct size of area at risk (AAR) Gnai2-/- → wt vs 44.0% wt → wt; p < 0.001) whereas the absence of Gαi2 in non-hematopoietic cells increased the infarct damage (66.5% wt → Gnai2-/- vs 44.0% wt → wt; p < 0.001). Previously we have reported the impact of platelet Gαi2 for mIRI. Here, we show that infarct size was substantially reduced when Gαi2 signaling was either genetically ablated in neutrophils/macrophages using LysM-driven Cre recombinase (AAR: 17.9% Gnai2fl/fl LysM-Cre+/tg vs 42.0% Gnai2fl/fl; p < 0.01) or selectively blocked with specific antibodies directed against Gαi2 (AAR: 19.0% (anti-Gαi2) vs 49.0% (IgG); p < 0.001). In addition, the number of platelet-neutrophil complexes (PNCs) in the infarcted area were reduced in both, genetically modified (PNCs: 18 (Gnai2fl/fl; LysM-Cre+/tg) vs 31 (Gnai2fl/fl); p < 0.001) and in anti-Gαi2 antibody-treated (PNCs: 9 (anti-Gαi2) vs 33 (IgG); p < 0.001) mice. Of note, significant infarct-limiting effects were achieved with a single anti-Gαi2 antibody challenge immediately prior to vessel reperfusion without affecting bleeding time, heart rate or cellular distribution of neutrophils. Finally, anti-Gαi2 antibody treatment also inhibited transendothelial migration of human neutrophils (25,885 (IgG) vs 13,225 (anti-Gαi2) neutrophils; p < 0.001), collectively suggesting that a therapeutic concept of functional Gαi2 inhibition during thrombolysis and reperfusion in patients with myocardial infarction should be further considered.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
靶向嗜中性粒细胞中的 Gαi2 可防止心肌缺血再灌注损伤。
中性粒细胞不仅参与抗感染的免疫防御,而且也会加剧缺血和再灌注后的组织损伤。我们之前已经证明,在小鼠体内对调节性 Gαi 蛋白进行基因消减对心肌缺血再灌注损伤(mIRI)既有保护作用,也有有害作用,这取决于删除的是哪一种同工酶。为了更深入、更详细地分析这些发现,我们首先在骨髓嵌合体中研究了驻留心脏细胞和循环血细胞中的 Gαi2 蛋白对 mIRI 的贡献。事实上,所有血细胞中 Gαi2 的缺失都会降低 mIRI 的程度(Gnai2-/- → wt vs 44.0% wt → wt,危险区(AAR)梗死面积的 22.9%;p i2),而非造血细胞中 Gαi2 的缺失则会增加梗死损伤(66.5% wt → Gnai2-/- vs 44.0% wt → wt,mIRI 的 p i2)。在这里,我们发现当使用 LysM 驱动的 Cre 重组酶基因消减中性粒细胞/巨噬细胞中的 Gαi2 信号时,梗死面积会大幅缩小(AAR:17.9% Gnai2fl/fl LysM-Cre+/tg vs 42.0% Gnai2fl/fl; p i2 (AAR:19.0% (anti-Gαi2) vs 49.0% (IgG);p fl/fl;LysM-Cre+/tg) vs 31 (Gnai2fl/fl);p i2 抗体处理(PNCs:9 (anti-Gαi2) vs 33 (IgG);p i2 在血管再灌注前立即进行抗体挑战,不会影响出血时间、心率或中性粒细胞的细胞分布。最后,抗 Gαi2 抗体治疗还能抑制人类中性粒细胞的跨内皮迁移(25 885 个(IgG)对 13 225 个(抗 Gαi2 )中性粒细胞;心肌梗塞患者溶栓和再灌注期间的 p i2 抑制作用应进一步考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Basic Research in Cardiology
Basic Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic Research in Cardiology is an international journal for cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles related to experimental cardiology that meet its stringent scientific standards. Basic Research in Cardiology regularly receives articles from the fields of - Molecular and Cellular Biology - Biochemistry - Biophysics - Pharmacology - Physiology and Pathology - Clinical Cardiology
期刊最新文献
Cardioprotection strategies for anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Immuno-related cardio-vascular adverse events associated with immuno-oncological treatments: an under-estimated threat for cancer patients. Cardioprotection of voluntary exercise against breast cancer-induced cardiac injury via STAT3. β3-Adrenergic receptor overexpression in cardiomyocytes preconditions mitochondria to withstand ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proprioceptors of the human pericardium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1