Outpatient Follow-Up and Reconstructive Surgery Rates in Massive Burn Survivors: Investigating the Social Determinants.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae095
Jessica Valdez, Soman Sen, Tina Palmieri, Kathleen Romanowski, David Greenhalgh, Jason Heard
{"title":"Outpatient Follow-Up and Reconstructive Surgery Rates in Massive Burn Survivors: Investigating the Social Determinants.","authors":"Jessica Valdez, Soman Sen, Tina Palmieri, Kathleen Romanowski, David Greenhalgh, Jason Heard","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn care continues to improve and larger total body surface area (TBSA) burn survival is increasing. These survivors require more extensive care than smaller burns and are at higher risk for wound/scar-related complications. Prior work has shown low rates of follow-up for burn survivors linked to socioeconomic factors such as housing insecurity and substance use. There are limited studies that evaluate socioeconomic factors that contribute to follow-up and reconstructive surgery rates in massively burned patients. Patients who survived to discharge with >50% TBSA burns and planned return to the treating institution were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the data collected. Sixty-five patients were included with an average TBSA of 63.1%. Fifty-three patients (81.5%) attended at least one follow-up appointment with median of 4 follow-up appointments. Younger patients (33 ± 9 vs 44 ± 11; P = .0006), patients with larger TBSA burns (65 ± 13 vs 55 ± 5%; P = .02), those with private insurance, and those without housing insecurity (1.8% vs 45.4%; P = .003) were more likely to follow up. On multivariate regression analysis, patients with housing insecurity were independently associated with lack of follow-up (OR: 0.009; CI: 0.00001-0.57). Thirty-five patients had at least one reconstructive surgery and 31 patients had reconstructive surgery after discharge. No patients with housing insecurity underwent reconstructive surgery. Follow-up rates in massive burns were higher than reported for smaller TBSA burns and more than half received reconstructive surgery. Housing-insecure patients should be targeted for improved follow-up and access to reconstructive surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1423-1428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn care continues to improve and larger total body surface area (TBSA) burn survival is increasing. These survivors require more extensive care than smaller burns and are at higher risk for wound/scar-related complications. Prior work has shown low rates of follow-up for burn survivors linked to socioeconomic factors such as housing insecurity and substance use. There are limited studies that evaluate socioeconomic factors that contribute to follow-up and reconstructive surgery rates in massively burned patients. Patients who survived to discharge with >50% TBSA burns and planned return to the treating institution were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the data collected. Sixty-five patients were included with an average TBSA of 63.1%. Fifty-three patients (81.5%) attended at least one follow-up appointment with median of 4 follow-up appointments. Younger patients (33 ± 9 vs 44 ± 11; P = .0006), patients with larger TBSA burns (65 ± 13 vs 55 ± 5%; P = .02), those with private insurance, and those without housing insecurity (1.8% vs 45.4%; P = .003) were more likely to follow up. On multivariate regression analysis, patients with housing insecurity were independently associated with lack of follow-up (OR: 0.009; CI: 0.00001-0.57). Thirty-five patients had at least one reconstructive surgery and 31 patients had reconstructive surgery after discharge. No patients with housing insecurity underwent reconstructive surgery. Follow-up rates in massive burns were higher than reported for smaller TBSA burns and more than half received reconstructive surgery. Housing-insecure patients should be targeted for improved follow-up and access to reconstructive surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大面积烧伤幸存者的门诊随访和重建手术率:调查社会决定因素。
烧伤护理工作在不断改进,总体表面积(TBSA)较大的烧伤患者的存活率也在不断提高。与面积较小的烧伤相比,这些幸存者需要更广泛的护理,而且出现伤口/疤痕相关并发症的风险也更高。之前的研究表明,烧伤幸存者的随访率低与社会经济因素(如住房不安全和药物使用)有关。目前评估社会经济因素对大面积烧伤患者的随访率和重建手术率影响的研究非常有限。本研究将TBSA烧伤面积大于50%并计划返回治疗机构的存活出院患者纳入研究范围。对收集到的数据进行了单变量和多变量分析。研究共纳入 65 名患者,平均 TBSA 为 63.1%。53名患者(81.5%)至少参加了一次随访,随访次数中位数为四次。较年轻的患者(33±9 vs 44±11;p=0.0006)、TBSA 较大的烧伤患者(65±13 vs 55±5%;p=0.02)、有私人保险的患者和住房无保障的患者(1.8% vs 45.4%;p=0.003)更有可能复诊。在多变量回归分析中,住房无保障的患者与缺乏随访有独立关联(OR:0.009 CI:0.00001-0.57)。35 名患者至少接受了一次整形手术,31 名患者在出院后接受了整形手术。没有住房无保障的患者接受整形手术。大面积烧伤患者的随访率高于TBSA较小的烧伤患者,半数以上的患者接受了整形手术。住房无保障的患者应成为改善随访和接受整形手术的目标人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Cytokine storm in a massively burned pediatric patient. Scientific production on electrical burns: a bibliometric analysis (1946-2023). Carbohydrate and wound healing in critically ill burn patients: A retrospective cohort study. A Pilot Study on the Impact of Smoking on Adipose Derived Stem Cell Function in Burn Patients. Challenges in Geographic Access to Specialized Pediatric Burn Care in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1