Challenges in Geographic Access to Specialized Pediatric Burn Care in the United States.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/iraf002
Jacob M Dougherty, Eva S Blake, Christopher J Rittle, Zhaohui Fan, Mary A Hunter, Mark R Hemmila, Naveen F Sangji
{"title":"Challenges in Geographic Access to Specialized Pediatric Burn Care in the United States.","authors":"Jacob M Dougherty, Eva S Blake, Christopher J Rittle, Zhaohui Fan, Mary A Hunter, Mark R Hemmila, Naveen F Sangji","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geographical access to pediatric burn centers in the US is not well described. Patients may receive care at American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn centers, unverified burn centers, or non-burn centers. A recent study indicated that most US counties do not have an ABA-verified pediatric burn center within 100 miles. However, access to unverified burn centers that provide care to pediatric burn patients was not considered. We studied access to all pediatric burn centers across different US regions, using American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma-verified pediatric trauma centers as a benchmark.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted using 2022 US Census data. Individuals aged ≤14 years were included. Geographical location was determined by residence ZIP code. Pediatric burn centers were identified from the ABA directory. Pediatric trauma centers were identified by ACS verification status using the ACS Hospitals and Facilities directory. Population access to pediatric burn and trauma centers within 50, 100, and 300 miles of the home ZIP code was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of US children, 62.1%, 83.5%, and 98.6% live within 50, 100, and 300 miles of a pediatric burn center. Access to ABA-verified pediatric burn centers is lower compared to access to ACS-verified pediatric trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the US population has limited access to pediatric burn centers compared to pediatric trauma centers. The services offered and outcomes should be studied to better understand differences in the quality of care provided by verified and unverified centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geographical access to pediatric burn centers in the US is not well described. Patients may receive care at American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn centers, unverified burn centers, or non-burn centers. A recent study indicated that most US counties do not have an ABA-verified pediatric burn center within 100 miles. However, access to unverified burn centers that provide care to pediatric burn patients was not considered. We studied access to all pediatric burn centers across different US regions, using American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma-verified pediatric trauma centers as a benchmark.

Study design: An observational cohort study was conducted using 2022 US Census data. Individuals aged ≤14 years were included. Geographical location was determined by residence ZIP code. Pediatric burn centers were identified from the ABA directory. Pediatric trauma centers were identified by ACS verification status using the ACS Hospitals and Facilities directory. Population access to pediatric burn and trauma centers within 50, 100, and 300 miles of the home ZIP code was assessed.

Results: Of US children, 62.1%, 83.5%, and 98.6% live within 50, 100, and 300 miles of a pediatric burn center. Access to ABA-verified pediatric burn centers is lower compared to access to ACS-verified pediatric trauma centers.

Conclusions: Overall, the US population has limited access to pediatric burn centers compared to pediatric trauma centers. The services offered and outcomes should be studied to better understand differences in the quality of care provided by verified and unverified centers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在地理上的挑战获得专业儿科烧伤护理在美国。
背景:在美国儿科烧伤中心的地理访问没有很好的描述。患者可以在美国烧伤协会(ABA)认证的烧伤中心、未经认证的烧伤中心或非烧伤中心接受治疗。最近的一项研究表明,美国大多数县在100英里范围内都没有aba认证的儿科烧伤中心。然而,没有考虑进入未经证实的烧伤中心,为儿科烧伤患者提供护理。我们研究了美国不同地区所有儿科烧伤中心的准入情况,以美国外科医师学会(ACS)创伤委员会认证的儿科创伤中心为基准。研究设计:一项观察性队列研究使用2022年美国人口普查数据进行。纳入年龄≤14岁的个体。地理位置由居住地邮政编码确定。从ABA目录中确定了儿科烧伤中心。使用ACS医院和设施目录,通过ACS验证状态确定儿科创伤中心。在距离家庭邮政编码50,100和300英里范围内的儿童烧伤和创伤中心的人口访问情况进行了评估。结果:在美国儿童中,62.1%、83.5%和98.6%的儿童生活在距离儿科烧伤中心50英里、100英里和300英里的范围内。与acs认证的儿科创伤中心相比,获得aba认证的儿科烧伤中心的机会更少。结论:总体而言,与儿科创伤中心相比,美国人口进入儿科烧伤中心的机会有限。应研究所提供的服务和结果,以更好地了解经过验证和未经验证的中心所提供的护理质量的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Burn center versus burn unit, which is better? Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and its Use in Burn Wounds: An Updated Systematic Review. Burn Progression in Human Skin - A Review of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research. Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review. Wildland Firefighters Suffer Increasing Risk of Job-Related Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1