Are we just talking in circles? Impact of psychoeducation on disease knowledge and relapse in severe alcohol use disorder

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.) Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1111/acer.15375
Pierre Maurage, Céline Boudehent, Louise Ferrié, Nicolas Cabé, Anne-Lise Pitel
{"title":"Are we just talking in circles? Impact of psychoeducation on disease knowledge and relapse in severe alcohol use disorder","authors":"Pierre Maurage,&nbsp;Céline Boudehent,&nbsp;Louise Ferrié,&nbsp;Nicolas Cabé,&nbsp;Anne-Lise Pitel","doi":"10.1111/acer.15375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Psychoeducation constitutes a routine therapeutic practice in most treatment settings for severe alcohol use disorder (sAUD). This technique is considered an efficient way to help patients to learn more about their disease and achieve therapeutic objectives. However, this approach capitalizes on three untested assumptions: namely, that (1) patients with sAUD possess insufficient knowledge about sAUD at treatment entry; (2) patients with sAUD have the cognitive resources to learn new information and benefit from psychoeducation; and (3) psychoeducation positively impacts clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We tested these assumptions in two experimental studies. In the first experiment in 66 recently detoxified patients with sAUD and 102 matched healthy controls, we measured baseline knowledge on sAUD through self-reported questionnaires, determined whether an up-to-date psychoeducation program can improve this knowledge, explored the role of cognitive abilities in such learning, and established the impact of psychoeducation on relapse rates. In a second experiment in 23 patients and 17 healthy controls, we examined whether the increased knowledge following psychoeducation is alcohol specific, and whether the motivation to change influences the relation between psychoeducation and clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At treatment entry, patients with sAUD presented with more sAUD-related knowledge than healthy controls, and were able to increase this knowledge following psychoeducation, independently of their cognitive status. However, psychoeducation did not impact either the motivation to change or relapse rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Psychoeducation can increase patients' knowledge about sAUD, but it does not increase the likelihood of abstinence or controlled low consumption after discharge. Thus, clinicians should question whether psychoeducation should occupy a central position in the therapeutic programs and reconsider what can be expected from psychoeducation in terms of achieving therapeutic objectives.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychoeducation constitutes a routine therapeutic practice in most treatment settings for severe alcohol use disorder (sAUD). This technique is considered an efficient way to help patients to learn more about their disease and achieve therapeutic objectives. However, this approach capitalizes on three untested assumptions: namely, that (1) patients with sAUD possess insufficient knowledge about sAUD at treatment entry; (2) patients with sAUD have the cognitive resources to learn new information and benefit from psychoeducation; and (3) psychoeducation positively impacts clinical outcomes.

Methods

We tested these assumptions in two experimental studies. In the first experiment in 66 recently detoxified patients with sAUD and 102 matched healthy controls, we measured baseline knowledge on sAUD through self-reported questionnaires, determined whether an up-to-date psychoeducation program can improve this knowledge, explored the role of cognitive abilities in such learning, and established the impact of psychoeducation on relapse rates. In a second experiment in 23 patients and 17 healthy controls, we examined whether the increased knowledge following psychoeducation is alcohol specific, and whether the motivation to change influences the relation between psychoeducation and clinical outcomes.

Results

At treatment entry, patients with sAUD presented with more sAUD-related knowledge than healthy controls, and were able to increase this knowledge following psychoeducation, independently of their cognitive status. However, psychoeducation did not impact either the motivation to change or relapse rates.

Conclusions

Psychoeducation can increase patients' knowledge about sAUD, but it does not increase the likelihood of abstinence or controlled low consumption after discharge. Thus, clinicians should question whether psychoeducation should occupy a central position in the therapeutic programs and reconsider what can be expected from psychoeducation in terms of achieving therapeutic objectives.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们只是在兜圈子吗?心理教育对疾病知识和重度酒精使用障碍复发的影响。
背景:心理教育是大多数严重酒精使用障碍(sAUD)治疗机构的常规治疗方法。这种方法被认为是帮助患者进一步了解自身疾病并达到治疗目的的有效途径。然而,这种方法基于三个未经验证的假设:即(1)严重酒精使用障碍患者在开始治疗时对严重酒精使用障碍缺乏足够的了解;(2)严重酒精使用障碍患者拥有学习新信息并从心理教育中获益的认知资源;以及(3)心理教育会对临床结果产生积极影响:我们在两项实验研究中检验了这些假设。在第一项实验中,我们以 66 名刚戒毒的 sAUD 患者和 102 名匹配的健康对照者为研究对象,通过自我报告问卷测量了他们对 sAUD 的基本认识,确定了最新的心理教育计划是否能提高他们的认识,探讨了认知能力在这种学习中的作用,并确定了心理教育对复发率的影响。在对 23 名患者和 17 名健康对照者进行的第二次实验中,我们研究了心理教育后增加的知识是否针对酒精,以及改变的动机是否会影响心理教育和临床结果之间的关系:结果:在开始治疗时,sAUD 患者比健康对照组拥有更多与 sAUD 相关的知识,而且在接受心理教育后,这些知识的增加与他们的认知状况无关。然而,心理教育并没有影响患者的改变动机或复发率:结论:心理教育可以增加患者对 sAUD 的了解,但并不能增加出院后戒断或控制低消费量的可能性。因此,临床医生应质疑心理教育是否应在治疗方案中占据核心地位,并重新考虑心理教育在实现治疗目标方面的预期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Articles of Public Interest Impaired or not impaired: The accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in detecting cognitive impairment among patients with alcohol use disorder. Alcohol habits and alcohol-related health conditions of self-defined lifetime abstainers and never binge drinkers. Alcohol hangovers as a predictor of the development of immune-related chronic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1