Julia E McGuinness, Garnet L Anderson, Simukayi Mutasa, Dawn L Hershman, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar, Danika L Lew, Monica Yee, Eric A Brown, Sebastien S Kairouz, Nafisa Kuwajerwala, Therese B Bevers, John E Doster, Corrine Zarwan, Laura Kruper, Lori M Minasian, Leslie Ford, Banu Arun, Marian L Neuhouser, Gary E Goodman, Powel H Brown, Richard Ha, Katherine D Crew
{"title":"Effects of vitamin D supplementation on a deep learning-based mammographic evaluation in SWOG S0812.","authors":"Julia E McGuinness, Garnet L Anderson, Simukayi Mutasa, Dawn L Hershman, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar, Danika L Lew, Monica Yee, Eric A Brown, Sebastien S Kairouz, Nafisa Kuwajerwala, Therese B Bevers, John E Doster, Corrine Zarwan, Laura Kruper, Lori M Minasian, Leslie Ford, Banu Arun, Marian L Neuhouser, Gary E Goodman, Powel H Brown, Richard Ha, Katherine D Crew","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.