Revisiting surrogacy of pathological complete response for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY JNCI Cancer Spectrum Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkaf022
Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii
{"title":"Revisiting surrogacy of pathological complete response for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.","authors":"Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathological complete response has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant trials in early stage triple-negative breast cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration accepted pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes in high-risk early stage breast cancer for new drug approval. However, there is insufficient trial-level data to robustly support pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with clinical stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Data of odds ratios (ORs) for pathological complete response and hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival and overall survival were extracted. Disease-free survival was used as an alternative when event-free survival data were unavailable. A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale, coefficient of difference, and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to assess the trial-level association between odds ratio for pathological complete response and hazard ratio for overall survival and event-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight trials with 2342 patients were included. Three trials tested immune checkpoint inhibitors. Coefficient of difference (R2) was 0.2 for hazard ratio of event-free survival (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .27), and R2 for hazard ratio of overall survival was 0.19 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no strong evidence to support using pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for event-free survival or overall survival in early stage triple-negative breast cancer at the trial level. Because of the necessity of minimizing drug approval delay with reliable long-term outcome, further studies of surrogate markers in early stage triple-negative breast cancer are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pathological complete response has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant trials in early stage triple-negative breast cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration accepted pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes in high-risk early stage breast cancer for new drug approval. However, there is insufficient trial-level data to robustly support pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with clinical stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Data of odds ratios (ORs) for pathological complete response and hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival and overall survival were extracted. Disease-free survival was used as an alternative when event-free survival data were unavailable. A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale, coefficient of difference, and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to assess the trial-level association between odds ratio for pathological complete response and hazard ratio for overall survival and event-free survival.

Results: Eight trials with 2342 patients were included. Three trials tested immune checkpoint inhibitors. Coefficient of difference (R2) was 0.2 for hazard ratio of event-free survival (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .27), and R2 for hazard ratio of overall survival was 0.19 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .33).

Conclusions: There is no strong evidence to support using pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for event-free survival or overall survival in early stage triple-negative breast cancer at the trial level. Because of the necessity of minimizing drug approval delay with reliable long-term outcome, further studies of surrogate markers in early stage triple-negative breast cancer are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三阴性乳腺癌病理完全缓解对长期生存的影响。
背景:病理完全缓解(pCR)已被用作早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)新辅助试验的主要终点,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)接受pCR作为高风险早期乳腺癌长期生存结局的替代终点,以批准新药。然而,没有足够的试验水平的数据来强有力地支持pCR作为TNBC长期生存的替代品。方法:通过系统的文献综述,确定新辅助全身治疗临床I-III期TNBC患者的随机临床试验。提取pCR的优势比(ORs)、无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(hr)数据。当无法获得EFS数据时,将无病生存期作为替代方法。计算对数尺度线性回归模型、差异系数和95%置信区间(CI),以评估pCR的OR与OS和EFS的HR之间的试验水平相关性。结果:8项试验共纳入2,342例患者。三个试验测试了免疫检查点抑制剂。EFS的HR差异系数(R2)为0.2 (95% CI, 0.17 ~ 0.22, P = 0.27), OS的HR差异系数(R2)为0.19 (95% CI, 0.17 ~ 0.22, P = 0.33)。结论:在试验水平上,没有强有力的证据支持将pCR作为早期TNBC中EFS或OS的替代标志物。由于有必要尽量减少药物批准延迟和可靠的长期结果,因此有必要进一步研究早期TNBC的替代标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
A process evaluation of early palliative care implementation in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. Breast cancer screening and cancer prognosis in patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Type 2 diabetes and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis. Diet, nutrition, and hormone therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review with implications for future interventions. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage and pancreatic cancer among veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1