An In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Novel Irrigant Using Next-Generation Sequencing

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of endodontics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2024.05.010
{"title":"An In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Novel Irrigant Using Next-Generation Sequencing","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of </span>Triton irrigation versus 4% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) utilizing a direct contact test and an extracted tooth model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>In the first experiment, a direct contact test was conducted to compare bacterial DNA removal and </span>microbial diversity<span><span> changes following irrigation with 4% NaOCl or Triton. Hydroxyapatite<span> and dentin discs were inoculated with subgingival human-derived dental plaque for 2 weeks utilizing the Center for Disease Control biofilm reactor and subsequently challenged with the </span></span>root canal irrigants for 5 minutes. In the second experiment, teeth contaminated with a multispecies biofilm (</span></span><em>n</em> = 24) were assigned into two treatment groups, NaOCl or Triton irrigation. Samples were obtained for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing analysis before and after instrumentation. The Shannon and Chao1 indices were used to measure alpha diversity. The Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and ANOSIM was used to measure beta diversity. Differences in abundances of genera were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni corrections.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The direct contact test revealed no significant differences in the bacterial load based on 16S rRNA gene molecules/μL, reads, or differences in the Shannon index among groups. In the extracted tooth model, a bacterial load reduction of log</span><sub>10</sub> 3.08 ± 0.69 and 2.76 ± 0.91 were found for NaOCl and Triton, respectively (<em>P</em><span> = .348). Next-generation sequencing showed fewer reads, lower Chao1, and beta diversity values when pretreatment and post-treatment samples were assessed in both experimental groups (</span><em>P</em><span> &lt; .0001). The Kruskal–Wallis analysis found that 17 genera of bacteria were over-represented in minimal values in the Triton post-treatment group, 14 of these genera represented less than 1% of the microbial community.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both irrigants had limited antimicrobial activity in the direct contact test. When used in conjunction with mechanical instrumentation both irrigants were able to reduce the bacterial DNA load and diversity in comparison with pretreatment communities. The NaOCl irrigation, followed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid flush, was more effective in decreasing DNA counts from low-abundance organisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of Triton irrigation versus 4% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) utilizing a direct contact test and an extracted tooth model.

Methods

In the first experiment, a direct contact test was conducted to compare bacterial DNA removal and microbial diversity changes following irrigation with 4% NaOCl or Triton. Hydroxyapatite and dentin discs were inoculated with subgingival human-derived dental plaque for 2 weeks utilizing the Center for Disease Control biofilm reactor and subsequently challenged with the root canal irrigants for 5 minutes. In the second experiment, teeth contaminated with a multispecies biofilm (n = 24) were assigned into two treatment groups, NaOCl or Triton irrigation. Samples were obtained for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing analysis before and after instrumentation. The Shannon and Chao1 indices were used to measure alpha diversity. The Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and ANOSIM was used to measure beta diversity. Differences in abundances of genera were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni corrections.

Results

The direct contact test revealed no significant differences in the bacterial load based on 16S rRNA gene molecules/μL, reads, or differences in the Shannon index among groups. In the extracted tooth model, a bacterial load reduction of log10 3.08 ± 0.69 and 2.76 ± 0.91 were found for NaOCl and Triton, respectively (P = .348). Next-generation sequencing showed fewer reads, lower Chao1, and beta diversity values when pretreatment and post-treatment samples were assessed in both experimental groups (P < .0001). The Kruskal–Wallis analysis found that 17 genera of bacteria were over-represented in minimal values in the Triton post-treatment group, 14 of these genera represented less than 1% of the microbial community.

Conclusions

Both irrigants had limited antimicrobial activity in the direct contact test. When used in conjunction with mechanical instrumentation both irrigants were able to reduce the bacterial DNA load and diversity in comparison with pretreatment communities. The NaOCl irrigation, followed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid flush, was more effective in decreasing DNA counts from low-abundance organisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用新一代测序技术对新型冲洗剂的抗菌功效进行体外评估。
引言通过直接接触试验和拔牙模型,评估 Triton 冲洗剂与 4% NaOCl 的抗菌活性:在第一项实验中,进行了直接接触试验,以比较使用次氯酸钠(4% NaOCl)或 Triton 冲洗后细菌 DNA 清除率和微生物多样性的变化。利用 CDC 生物膜反应器将龈下人源牙菌斑接种到羟基磷灰石和牙本质圆盘上 2 周,然后用根管冲洗剂冲洗 5 分钟。在第二个实验中,受多菌种生物膜污染的牙齿(n=24)被分配到两个处理组,即 NaOCl 或 Triton 灌溉组。在使用仪器之前和之后,取样进行 qPCR 和新一代测序(NGS)分析。采用香农指数和 Chao1 指数来衡量阿尔法多样性。Bray-Curtis 差异度和 ANOSIM 用于测量贝塔多样性。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Bonferroni 校正来评估种属丰度的差异:结果:直接接触试验显示,根据 16S rRNA 基因分子/μL 和读数计算的细菌量没有显著差异,各组之间的香农指数也没有差异。在拔牙模型中,NaOCl 和 Triton 的细菌量分别减少了 log10 3.08 ± 0.69 和 2.76 ± 0.91(P = 0.348)。在对两个实验组的处理前和处理后样本进行评估时,NGS 显示读数较少,Chao1 和 beta 多样性值较低 (P < 0.0001)。Kruskal Wallis 分析发现,17 个细菌属在 Triton 后处理组中的最小值比例过高,其中 14 个细菌属在微生物群落中的比例低于 1%:结论:在直接接触试验中,两种冲洗剂的抗菌活性都很有限。与处理前的微生物群落相比,两种冲洗剂在与机械仪器结合使用时都能减少细菌 DNA 负荷和多样性。先用 NaOCl 冲洗,再用 EDTA 冲洗,能更有效地减少低丰度生物的 DNA 数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of preoperative oral cannabidiol-rich Cannabis extract on anxiety and postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. The effect of different separated file retrieval strategies on the biomechanical behavior of a mandibular molar: a finite element analysis study. Comparative Analysis of Temperature Changes with Preheated and Intracanal Heated Solutions and Ultrasonic Activation in Immature Teeth. Insights Into the November 2024 Issue of the Journal of Endodontics. CBCT scan-based assessment of the correlation between the location of caries and pulp canal obliteration: an aid to treatment planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1