Nonlinear relationships between eye gaze and recognition accuracy for ethnic ingroup and outgroup faces.

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1037/pspa0000395
Joshua Correll, Joana Quarenta, Tomás A Palma, Balbir Singh, Michael J Bernstein, Omar Hidalgo Vargas
{"title":"Nonlinear relationships between eye gaze and recognition accuracy for ethnic ingroup and outgroup faces.","authors":"Joshua Correll, Joana Quarenta, Tomás A Palma, Balbir Singh, Michael J Bernstein, Omar Hidalgo Vargas","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers have used eye-tracking measures to explore the relationship between face encoding and recognition, including the impact of ethnicity on this relationship. Previous studies offer a variety of conflicting conclusions. This confusion may stem from misestimation of the relationship between encoding and recognition. First, most previous models fail to account for the structure of eye-tracking data, potentially falling prey to Simpson's paradox. Second, previous models assume a linear relationship between attention (e.g., the number of fixations to a to-be-remembered face) and recognition accuracy. Two eye-tracking studies (<i>N</i>s = 41, 59), one online experiment that manipulates exposure (<i>N</i> = 150), and a mega-analysis examine the effects of ethnicity using what we believe to be more appropriate analytical models. Across studies and measures, we document a novel, critical pattern: The relationship between attention and recognition is nonlinear and negatively accelerating. At low levels of baseline attention, a small increment in attention improves recognition. However, as attention increases further, increments yield smaller and smaller benefits. This finding parallels work in learning and memory. In models that allow for nonlinearity, we find evidence that central features (eyes, nose, and mouth) generally contribute to recognition accuracy, potentially resolving disagreements in the field. We also find that the effects of attention on recognition are similar for ingroup and outgroup faces, which have important implications for theories of perceptual expertise. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"518-536"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have used eye-tracking measures to explore the relationship between face encoding and recognition, including the impact of ethnicity on this relationship. Previous studies offer a variety of conflicting conclusions. This confusion may stem from misestimation of the relationship between encoding and recognition. First, most previous models fail to account for the structure of eye-tracking data, potentially falling prey to Simpson's paradox. Second, previous models assume a linear relationship between attention (e.g., the number of fixations to a to-be-remembered face) and recognition accuracy. Two eye-tracking studies (Ns = 41, 59), one online experiment that manipulates exposure (N = 150), and a mega-analysis examine the effects of ethnicity using what we believe to be more appropriate analytical models. Across studies and measures, we document a novel, critical pattern: The relationship between attention and recognition is nonlinear and negatively accelerating. At low levels of baseline attention, a small increment in attention improves recognition. However, as attention increases further, increments yield smaller and smaller benefits. This finding parallels work in learning and memory. In models that allow for nonlinearity, we find evidence that central features (eyes, nose, and mouth) generally contribute to recognition accuracy, potentially resolving disagreements in the field. We also find that the effects of attention on recognition are similar for ingroup and outgroup faces, which have important implications for theories of perceptual expertise. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼睛注视与识别本族面孔和外族面孔准确率之间的非线性关系
研究人员使用眼动跟踪测量来探索人脸编码和识别之间的关系,包括种族对这种关系的影响。以往的研究得出了各种相互矛盾的结论。这种混乱可能源于对编码和识别之间关系的错误估计。首先,以前的大多数模型都没有考虑眼动跟踪数据的结构,可能会陷入辛普森悖论。其次,以往的模型假定注意力(如对待记忆人脸的固定次数)与识别准确率之间存在线性关系。两项眼动跟踪研究(Ns = 41、59)、一项操纵暴露的在线实验(Ns = 150)和一项大型分析使用我们认为更合适的分析模型来研究种族的影响。在所有的研究和测量中,我们发现了一种新颖而关键的模式:注意和识别之间的关系是非线性的,而且是负加速的。在基线注意力水平较低的情况下,注意力的小幅增加会提高识别能力。然而,随着注意力的进一步提高,增量带来的益处越来越小。这一发现与学习和记忆方面的研究结果相似。在允许非线性的模型中,我们发现有证据表明,中心特征(眼睛、鼻子和嘴巴)通常有助于提高识别准确率,从而有可能解决该领域的分歧。我们还发现,对于内群和外群人脸,注意力对识别的影响是相似的,这对知觉专业理论具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
期刊最新文献
Are multiracial faces perceptually distinct? Frontal alpha asymmetry as a marker of approach motivation? Insights from a cooperative forking path analysis. Values and stress: Examining the relations between values and general and domain-specific stress in two longitudinal studies. Compassionate love and beneficence in the family. How people (fail to) control the influence of affective stimuli on attitudes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1