[Rate of Correct Inhaler Usage and Related Factors in Elderly Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease].

Q3 Nursing Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.6224/JN.202406_71(3).07
Wan-Hung Wen, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Kwo-Chen Lee, Pei-Chao Lin
{"title":"[Rate of Correct Inhaler Usage and Related Factors in Elderly Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease].","authors":"Wan-Hung Wen, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Kwo-Chen Lee, Pei-Chao Lin","doi":"10.6224/JN.202406_71(3).07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor disease control in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with suboptimal inhaler use.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to explore the accuracy of inhaler use and related factors in elderly patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey design was used to recruit patients with COPD from a medical centre in southern Taiwan who were over 65 years old and used inhalers regularly. All of the data as well as information on inhaler use accuracy were collected using a self-designed questionnaire and inhaler operation checklist. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse significant correlates of correct inhaler operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the 150 participants was 75.0 years (SD = 7.5) years. Most used one type of inhaler only (86.0%). The rate of accurate inhaler operation was 40.7% (n = 61) for the sample, with dry powder inhalers associated with the highest accuracy (64%) and pressurized metered-dose inhalers associated with the lowest accuracy (1.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that using a soft mist inhaler (adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 23.29; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI [2.84, 191.07]), using a dry powder inhaler (AOR =15.60, 95% CI [1.99, 122.26]), and higher satisfaction with the inhaler were positively and independently associated with accurate inhaler use (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI [1.09, 3.44]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions / implications for practice: </strong>Important factors related to inhaler use accuracy include inhaler type and level of patient satisfaction with their inhaler. Healthcare professionals should regularly confirm that older patients are able to use their inhalers correctly and are satisfied with their inhalers.</p>","PeriodicalId":35672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing","volume":"71 3","pages":"43-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202406_71(3).07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poor disease control in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with suboptimal inhaler use.

Purpose: This study was designed to explore the accuracy of inhaler use and related factors in elderly patients with COPD.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was used to recruit patients with COPD from a medical centre in southern Taiwan who were over 65 years old and used inhalers regularly. All of the data as well as information on inhaler use accuracy were collected using a self-designed questionnaire and inhaler operation checklist. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse significant correlates of correct inhaler operation.

Results: The average age of the 150 participants was 75.0 years (SD = 7.5) years. Most used one type of inhaler only (86.0%). The rate of accurate inhaler operation was 40.7% (n = 61) for the sample, with dry powder inhalers associated with the highest accuracy (64%) and pressurized metered-dose inhalers associated with the lowest accuracy (1.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that using a soft mist inhaler (adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 23.29; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI [2.84, 191.07]), using a dry powder inhaler (AOR =15.60, 95% CI [1.99, 122.26]), and higher satisfaction with the inhaler were positively and independently associated with accurate inhaler use (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI [1.09, 3.44]).

Conclusions / implications for practice: Important factors related to inhaler use accuracy include inhaler type and level of patient satisfaction with their inhaler. Healthcare professionals should regularly confirm that older patients are able to use their inhalers correctly and are satisfied with their inhalers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[慢性阻塞性肺病老年患者正确使用吸入器的比率及相关因素]。
背景:目的:本研究旨在探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)老年患者使用吸入器的准确性及相关因素:方法:采用横断面调查设计,从台湾南部的一家医疗中心招募 65 岁以上定期使用吸入器的慢性阻塞性肺病患者。所有数据以及关于吸入器使用准确性的信息均通过自行设计的问卷和吸入器操作清单收集。采用多变量逻辑回归分析了吸入器正确操作的重要相关因素:150 名参与者的平均年龄为 75.0 岁(SD = 7.5)。大多数人只使用一种吸入器(86.0%)。样本中吸入器操作的准确率为 40.7%(n = 61),其中干粉吸入器的准确率最高(64%),加压计量吸入器的准确率最低(1.6%)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,使用软雾吸入器(调整赔率,AOR = 23.29;95% 置信区间,95% CI [2.84,191.07])、使用干粉吸入器(AOR =15.60,95% CI [1.99,122.26])以及对吸入器的较高满意度与吸入器的准确使用呈独立正相关(AOR =1.94,95% CI [1.09,3.44]):与吸入器使用准确性有关的重要因素包括吸入器类型和患者对吸入器的满意程度。医护人员应定期确认老年患者能够正确使用吸入器,并对其吸入器感到满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nursing
Journal of Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
[A Guide to Network Meta-Analysis Using Generative AI and No-Code Tools]. [A Study on the Life Attitudes, Fear of Death, and Dying Care Abilities of Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Institutions]. [Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Fall Prevention Program Incorporating an Interprofessional Team Collaboration Model on Reducing Fall Risk in Elderly Living in Long-term Care Facilities]. [Application of Artificial Intelligence Models in Nursing Research]. [Caregiving Experience With a Young Father With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Renal Dialysis and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1