{"title":"Peer Victimization and Callous-Unemotional Traits: The Impact of Parents and Teachers.","authors":"Carlos R Sanchez, John L Cooley","doi":"10.1007/s10802-024-01213-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on the link between peer victimization and callous-unemotional (CU) traits has primarily relied on cross-sectional designs and yielded equivocal findings. In light of the poor outcomes related to peer victimization and CU traits, it is important to determine whether this link is reciprocal in nature and to identify factors that may influence its strength. Accordingly, the current study investigated the bidirectional association between peer victimization and CU traits over a 6-month period, accounting for the moderating effects of parents (i.e., support and hostility) and teachers (i.e., support and conflict). Participants included 284 third- through fifth-grade students (ages 7-12; 51.8% boys; 51.1% Hispanic) and their homeroom teachers. Children provided ratings of peer victimization, parental hostility, and parent and teacher support. Teachers provided ratings of CU traits and student-teacher conflict. A series of cross-lagged panel models were estimated. Results revealed that, at higher levels of parental hostility, peer victimization predicted increases in CU traits over time; in contrast, peer victimization predicted decreases in CU traits at lower levels of parental hostility. Surprisingly, at higher levels of teacher conflict, peer victimization predicted decreases in CU traits over time. CU traits did not interact with parent or teacher variables to predict subsequent peer victimization. Moreover, parental hostility was positively associated with subsequent peer victimization, whereas teacher support predicted decreases in victimization over time. These findings build on previous research examining environmental influences on the expression of CU traits by highlighting peer victimization and parental hostility as potential risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1551-1564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01213-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on the link between peer victimization and callous-unemotional (CU) traits has primarily relied on cross-sectional designs and yielded equivocal findings. In light of the poor outcomes related to peer victimization and CU traits, it is important to determine whether this link is reciprocal in nature and to identify factors that may influence its strength. Accordingly, the current study investigated the bidirectional association between peer victimization and CU traits over a 6-month period, accounting for the moderating effects of parents (i.e., support and hostility) and teachers (i.e., support and conflict). Participants included 284 third- through fifth-grade students (ages 7-12; 51.8% boys; 51.1% Hispanic) and their homeroom teachers. Children provided ratings of peer victimization, parental hostility, and parent and teacher support. Teachers provided ratings of CU traits and student-teacher conflict. A series of cross-lagged panel models were estimated. Results revealed that, at higher levels of parental hostility, peer victimization predicted increases in CU traits over time; in contrast, peer victimization predicted decreases in CU traits at lower levels of parental hostility. Surprisingly, at higher levels of teacher conflict, peer victimization predicted decreases in CU traits over time. CU traits did not interact with parent or teacher variables to predict subsequent peer victimization. Moreover, parental hostility was positively associated with subsequent peer victimization, whereas teacher support predicted decreases in victimization over time. These findings build on previous research examining environmental influences on the expression of CU traits by highlighting peer victimization and parental hostility as potential risk factors.
有关同伴伤害与冷酷无情-不情感(CU)特质之间联系的研究主要依赖于横断面设计,得出的结论模棱两可。鉴于同伴伤害与 CU 特质之间的不良后果,确定这种联系是否具有互惠性质并找出可能影响其强度的因素非常重要。因此,本研究调查了 6 个月内同伴伤害与 CU 特质之间的双向联系,并考虑了父母(即支持和敌意)和教师(即支持和冲突)的调节作用。参与者包括 284 名三至五年级学生(7-12 岁;51.8% 为男生;51.1% 为西班牙裔)及其班主任。孩子们对同伴伤害、父母敌意以及父母和老师的支持进行了评分。教师则对 CU 特质和师生冲突进行评分。对一系列交叉滞后面板模型进行了估计。结果表明,在父母敌意程度较高的情况下,同伴伤害会随着时间的推移预示着CU特质的增加;相反,在父母敌意程度较低的情况下,同伴伤害会预示着CU特质的减少。令人惊讶的是,在教师冲突程度较高的情况下,同伴伤害会随着时间的推移而降低儿童的认知障碍特质。CU特质并没有与父母或教师变量相互作用,从而预测随后的同伴伤害。此外,父母的敌意与随后的同伴伤害行为呈正相关,而教师的支持则预示着伤害行为会随着时间的推移而减少。这些研究结果是在以往研究环境对CU特质表达影响的基础上得出的,强调了同伴伤害和父母敌意是潜在的风险因素。