A 13- to 17-year Retrospective Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of Anterior and Posterior Lithium Disilicate Restorations onto Teeth and Implants.

Giacomo Fabbri, Fernando Zarone, Gianluca Dellificorelli, Giorgio Cannistraro, Marco De Lorenzi, Alberto Mosca, Renato Leone, Roberto Sorrentino
{"title":"A 13- to 17-year Retrospective Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of Anterior and Posterior Lithium Disilicate Restorations onto Teeth and Implants.","authors":"Giacomo Fabbri, Fernando Zarone, Gianluca Dellificorelli, Giorgio Cannistraro, Marco De Lorenzi, Alberto Mosca, Renato Leone, Roberto Sorrentino","doi":"10.11607/prd.7074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study aimed at evaluating the clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate prostheses onto teeth and implants. A total of 860 restorations were delivered to 312 patients, including crowns, veneers and onlays. Patients with uncontrolled gingival inflammation and/or periodontitis were excluded, whilst subjects with occlusal parafunctions were included. The retrospective observational period ranged between 13 to 17 years. The mechanical and esthetic performances of the restorations were rated according to the modified CDA criteria. The recorded data were analyzed statistically. In total, 26 mechanical complications were noticed: 17 ceramic chippings, 5 core fractures and 4 losses of retention. Mechanical complications occurred predominantly in posterior areas; monolithic prostheses showed the lowest percentage of structural problems. The clinical scores of layered and monolithic restorations were fully satisfactory according to the modified CDA rating. The cumulative survival and success rates ranged between 95.46-100% and 93.75-100% respectively up to 17 years of follow-up. Although patient selection and the rigorous application of validated clinical protocols were considered paramount, the use of lithium disilicate prostheses onto teeth and implants was reported to be a viable and reliable treatment option in the long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed at evaluating the clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate prostheses onto teeth and implants. A total of 860 restorations were delivered to 312 patients, including crowns, veneers and onlays. Patients with uncontrolled gingival inflammation and/or periodontitis were excluded, whilst subjects with occlusal parafunctions were included. The retrospective observational period ranged between 13 to 17 years. The mechanical and esthetic performances of the restorations were rated according to the modified CDA criteria. The recorded data were analyzed statistically. In total, 26 mechanical complications were noticed: 17 ceramic chippings, 5 core fractures and 4 losses of retention. Mechanical complications occurred predominantly in posterior areas; monolithic prostheses showed the lowest percentage of structural problems. The clinical scores of layered and monolithic restorations were fully satisfactory according to the modified CDA rating. The cumulative survival and success rates ranged between 95.46-100% and 93.75-100% respectively up to 17 years of follow-up. Although patient selection and the rigorous application of validated clinical protocols were considered paramount, the use of lithium disilicate prostheses onto teeth and implants was reported to be a viable and reliable treatment option in the long-term.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对二硅酸锂前牙和后牙修复体及种植体临床表现的 13 至 17 年回顾性评估。
这项回顾性研究旨在评估二硅酸锂修复体对牙齿和种植体的临床效果。共为 312 名患者提供了 860 个修复体,包括牙冠、贴面和嵌体。患有未控制的牙龈炎症和/或牙周炎的患者被排除在外,而患有咬合功能障碍的患者则被包括在内。回顾性观察期为 13 至 17 年。根据修改后的 CDA 标准对修复体的机械和美学性能进行评分。对记录的数据进行了统计分析。总共发现了 26 个机械并发症:其中17例为陶瓷崩裂,5例为核心断裂,4例为固位丧失。机械并发症主要发生在后部;整体式义齿出现结构问题的比例最低。根据修正的CDA评分,分层修复体和整体修复体的临床评分完全令人满意。在长达17年的随访中,累积存活率和成功率分别为95.46%-100%和93.75%-100%。尽管对患者的选择和严格应用经过验证的临床方案被认为是最重要的,但据报道,在牙齿和种植体上使用二硅酸锂修复体是一种可行且可靠的长期治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Cement- Versus Screw-Retained Implant Positioning in the Esthetic Zone on Emergence Angle: A Proof-of-Principle Study. The Management of Gingival Fenestration: A Series of Three Cases. Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Patient Communication: Current Possibilities. Autonomous Dental Implant Robotic System Utilization for Implant Placement and Transcrestal Sinus Elevation Using Osseodensification: A Case Report. Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures Performed with Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: Clinical and Histologic Outcomes in a Case Series: Part II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1