Attitudes to long-term care in India: A secondary, mixed methods analysis

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1002/gps.6107
Sweedal Alberts, Abinaya Nadarajah, Claudia Cooper, Bianca Brijnath, Santosh Loganathan, Matthew Varghese, Josefine Antoniades, Upasana Baruah, Briony Dow, Mike Kent, Rachita Rao, Jessica Budgett, Amaani Ahmed
{"title":"Attitudes to long-term care in India: A secondary, mixed methods analysis","authors":"Sweedal Alberts,&nbsp;Abinaya Nadarajah,&nbsp;Claudia Cooper,&nbsp;Bianca Brijnath,&nbsp;Santosh Loganathan,&nbsp;Matthew Varghese,&nbsp;Josefine Antoniades,&nbsp;Upasana Baruah,&nbsp;Briony Dow,&nbsp;Mike Kent,&nbsp;Rachita Rao,&nbsp;Jessica Budgett,&nbsp;Amaani Ahmed","doi":"10.1002/gps.6107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>In India, globalisation is purported to have contributed to shifting family structures and changing attitudes to long-term care (LTC) facility use. We investigated the attitudes to and usage frequency of LTC in India.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted secondary analyses of: (a) The Moving Pictures India Project qualitative interviews with 19 carers for people with dementia and 25 professionals, collected in 2022, exploring attitudes to LTC; and (b) The Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) 2017–2018, cross-sectional survey of a randomised probability sample of Indian adults aged 45+ living in private households.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified three themes from qualitative data: (1) <i>LTC as a last resort</i>, describes how LTC could be acceptable if care at home was “impossible” due to the person's medical condition or unavailability of the family carer, for example, if family members lived overseas or interstate. (2) <i>Social expectations</i> of care at home from family members and paid carers and; (3) <i>Limited availability of LTC</i> facilities in India, especially in rural localities, and the financial barriers to their use. Of 73,396 LASI participants, 40 were considering moving to LTC; 18,281 had a parent alive, of whom 9 reported that their father, and 16 that their mother, lived in LTC. LTC use was rare. While a third of participants with a living parent lived in urban areas, 14/24 of those with a parent in LTC lived in an urban area, supporting our qualitative findings that LTC is mainly accessed in urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Preference for intergenerational community care combined with limited availability and societal stigma contribute to low rates of LTC use among Indian families. Future social policies should consider how to plan for greater equity in strengthening care at home and in the community, and bolstering respite and LTC services as a last resort.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.6107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In India, globalisation is purported to have contributed to shifting family structures and changing attitudes to long-term care (LTC) facility use. We investigated the attitudes to and usage frequency of LTC in India.

Methods

We conducted secondary analyses of: (a) The Moving Pictures India Project qualitative interviews with 19 carers for people with dementia and 25 professionals, collected in 2022, exploring attitudes to LTC; and (b) The Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) 2017–2018, cross-sectional survey of a randomised probability sample of Indian adults aged 45+ living in private households.

Results

We identified three themes from qualitative data: (1) LTC as a last resort, describes how LTC could be acceptable if care at home was “impossible” due to the person's medical condition or unavailability of the family carer, for example, if family members lived overseas or interstate. (2) Social expectations of care at home from family members and paid carers and; (3) Limited availability of LTC facilities in India, especially in rural localities, and the financial barriers to their use. Of 73,396 LASI participants, 40 were considering moving to LTC; 18,281 had a parent alive, of whom 9 reported that their father, and 16 that their mother, lived in LTC. LTC use was rare. While a third of participants with a living parent lived in urban areas, 14/24 of those with a parent in LTC lived in an urban area, supporting our qualitative findings that LTC is mainly accessed in urban areas.

Conclusions

Preference for intergenerational community care combined with limited availability and societal stigma contribute to low rates of LTC use among Indian families. Future social policies should consider how to plan for greater equity in strengthening care at home and in the community, and bolstering respite and LTC services as a last resort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度人对长期护理的态度:二级混合方法分析。
目的:在印度,据说全球化导致了家庭结构的转变和对长期护理(LTC)设施使用态度的改变。我们调查了印度人对长期护理设施的态度和使用频率:我们对以下资料进行了二次分析(方法:我们对以下内容进行了二次分析:(a)2022 年收集的 "印度移动图片项目 "定性访谈,访谈对象包括 19 名痴呆症患者的照顾者和 25 名专业人士,内容涉及对长期护理的态度;以及(b)2017-2018 年 "印度纵向老龄化研究"(LASI)横断面调查,调查对象为居住在私人家庭中的 45 岁以上印度成年人的随机概率样本:我们从定性数据中确定了三个主题:(1)作为最后手段的长期护理,描述了如果由于个人的身体状况或家庭照顾者无法提供在家护理(例如,如果家庭成员居住在海外或州际)而 "不可能 "提供长期护理时,如何接受长期护理。(2) 社会对家庭成员和有偿照顾者在家提供护理的期望;(3) 印度(尤其是农村地区)的长期护理设施有限,使用这些设施存在经济障碍。在 73,396 名 LASI 参与者中,有 40 人正在考虑搬到长期护理中心居住;18,281 人的父母健在,其中 9 人称其父亲、16 人称其母亲住在长期护理中心。使用长期护理中心的情况很少。父母健在的参与者中有三分之一居住在城市地区,而父母居住在长期护理中心的参与者中有 14/24 居住在城市地区,这支持了我们的定性研究结果,即长期护理中心主要在城市地区使用:结论:对代际社区护理的偏好,加上有限的可用性和社会耻辱感,导致印度家庭中使用长期护理服务的比例较低。未来的社会政策应考虑如何在加强家庭和社区护理方面实现更大程度的公平,并将加强临时和长期护理服务作为最后的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
期刊最新文献
Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in the Pathophysiology of Late Life Depression Exploring Determinants of Institutionalization Among Germany's Oldest Old Female Reproductive Period Length, Parity and Hormonal Replacement Therapy and Dementia: The Elsi-Brazil Study Comparative Post-Marketing Surveillance of Memantine and Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Cardiovascular Adverse Events With a Focus on Sex Differences Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database Balancing Duty, Stigma, and Caregiving Needs of People With Neurodevelopmental or Neurocognitive Disorders During a Public Health Emergency in South Asia: A Qualitative Study of Carer Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1