Proton pump inhibitor versus potassium-competitive acid blocker in gastroesophageal reflux disease

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY JGH Open Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.13104
Tadayuki Oshima
{"title":"Proton pump inhibitor versus potassium-competitive acid blocker in gastroesophageal reflux disease","authors":"Tadayuki Oshima","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.13104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent disorder with a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QOL), and its global prevalence is increasing. Therapy goals for GERD encompass symptom resolution, healing of esophageal inflammation, and prevention of complications. Healing of esophageal erosions, in particular, has been traditionally emphasized as an objective measure and primary endpoint in clinical trials. In this context, the findings presented by Simadibrate <i>et al</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span> in this journal issue support the potential superiority of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) as a maintenance therapy for GERD. P-CABs have been developed to meet the unmet needs of conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), providing rapid, long-lasting, and reversible inhibition of the proton pump (H<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup> ATPase α subunit).<span><sup>2</sup></span> Recent other meta-analyses and network meta-analyses have evaluated the efficacy of vonoprazan, keverprazan, and tegoprazan for the maintenance therapy of GERD. Vonoprazan, especially, has demonstrated superior efficacy over conventional PPIs in maintaining GERD treatment, particularly in cases of severe reflux esophagitis.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span></p><p>While mucosal healing remains crucial in GERD maintenance, the importance of heartburn-free days should not be underestimated. However, only one study has shown a significant increase in 24-h heartburn-free days during maintenance, and one-fifth of GERD patients still experienced symptoms despite maintenance treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 15 mg.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Consequently, further investigations are necessary to definitively determine the superior efficacy of P-CABs over conventional PPIs. Moreover, there is still room for devising treatments to improve GERD symptoms, beyond simply suppressing acid secretion.</p><p>Furthermore, it is essential to consider the minimal effective dose in treatment to mitigate the risk of side effects. The safety profile of P-CABs remains uncertain, particularly regarding the contentious issue of gastric cancer development and alterations in gut microbiota. Additionally, data on the long-term safety of keverprazan and tegoprazan are scarce. Given the incomplete assessment of gastric acid suppression levels with these medications, caution is warranted in interpreting the available data, especially regarding effective dosages and the comparative characteristics among P-CABs.</p><p>When assessing the efficacy of GERD treatment, the varying degrees of gastric acid suppression among P-CABs with different doses emerge as a crucial consideration. Given the observed differences in <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> eradication rates and gastrin levels among P-CABs, it becomes essential to evaluate the extent of gastric acid suppression and potential disparate effects among these medications. Notably, with increasing doses of vonoprazan, the occurrence of nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB) is markedly reduced,<span><sup>6</sup></span> in contrast to conventional PPIs that exhibit limited nocturnal acid suppression. These distinctions likely contribute to the increased rate of <i>H. pylori</i> eradication seen in regimens including vonoprazan.<span><sup>7</sup></span></p><p>In the context of initial GERD treatment, reflux symptoms often persist inadequately after the initial dose of PPIs in approximately two-thirds of patients due to the slow onset of action, with around half of patients still experiencing symptoms even after 3 days of treatment. Vonoprazan has demonstrated rapid acid suppression compared with lansoprazole and has shown superior efficacy in achieving complete heartburn relief, particularly within the first week of therapy, in patients with erosive esophagitis.<span><sup>8</sup></span> Moreover, vonoprazan has been found to provide more effective nighttime heartburn relief than lansoprazole in this patient population and has been shown to improve sleep quality within 1 week, a benefit not observed with lansoprazole. Recent research has indicated that tegoprazan exhibits more rapid and potent nighttime acid suppression compared with vonoprazan or esomeprazole when administered nocturnally.<span><sup>9</sup></span> A network meta-analysis has further highlighted that vonoprazan is either equally or more effective than conventional PPIs in resolving heartburn on both Day 1 and Day 7 in patients with erosive esophagitis.<span><sup>10</sup></span> Consequently, vonoprazan may be considered as a first-line therapy to alleviate symptoms and enhance patients' QOL.</p><p>The treatment efficacy of P-CABs for GERD requires meticulous assessment. Given the potential variation in acid suppressive effects and approved doses among P-CABs, direct comparison of treatment effects among them is challenging. Therefore, individual evaluation of each P-CAB is essential for future analyses, rather than considering them collectively as a group.</p>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.13104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.13104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent disorder with a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QOL), and its global prevalence is increasing. Therapy goals for GERD encompass symptom resolution, healing of esophageal inflammation, and prevention of complications. Healing of esophageal erosions, in particular, has been traditionally emphasized as an objective measure and primary endpoint in clinical trials. In this context, the findings presented by Simadibrate et al.1 in this journal issue support the potential superiority of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) as a maintenance therapy for GERD. P-CABs have been developed to meet the unmet needs of conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), providing rapid, long-lasting, and reversible inhibition of the proton pump (H+, K+ ATPase α subunit).2 Recent other meta-analyses and network meta-analyses have evaluated the efficacy of vonoprazan, keverprazan, and tegoprazan for the maintenance therapy of GERD. Vonoprazan, especially, has demonstrated superior efficacy over conventional PPIs in maintaining GERD treatment, particularly in cases of severe reflux esophagitis.3, 4

While mucosal healing remains crucial in GERD maintenance, the importance of heartburn-free days should not be underestimated. However, only one study has shown a significant increase in 24-h heartburn-free days during maintenance, and one-fifth of GERD patients still experienced symptoms despite maintenance treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 15 mg.5 Consequently, further investigations are necessary to definitively determine the superior efficacy of P-CABs over conventional PPIs. Moreover, there is still room for devising treatments to improve GERD symptoms, beyond simply suppressing acid secretion.

Furthermore, it is essential to consider the minimal effective dose in treatment to mitigate the risk of side effects. The safety profile of P-CABs remains uncertain, particularly regarding the contentious issue of gastric cancer development and alterations in gut microbiota. Additionally, data on the long-term safety of keverprazan and tegoprazan are scarce. Given the incomplete assessment of gastric acid suppression levels with these medications, caution is warranted in interpreting the available data, especially regarding effective dosages and the comparative characteristics among P-CABs.

When assessing the efficacy of GERD treatment, the varying degrees of gastric acid suppression among P-CABs with different doses emerge as a crucial consideration. Given the observed differences in Helicobacter pylori eradication rates and gastrin levels among P-CABs, it becomes essential to evaluate the extent of gastric acid suppression and potential disparate effects among these medications. Notably, with increasing doses of vonoprazan, the occurrence of nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB) is markedly reduced,6 in contrast to conventional PPIs that exhibit limited nocturnal acid suppression. These distinctions likely contribute to the increased rate of H. pylori eradication seen in regimens including vonoprazan.7

In the context of initial GERD treatment, reflux symptoms often persist inadequately after the initial dose of PPIs in approximately two-thirds of patients due to the slow onset of action, with around half of patients still experiencing symptoms even after 3 days of treatment. Vonoprazan has demonstrated rapid acid suppression compared with lansoprazole and has shown superior efficacy in achieving complete heartburn relief, particularly within the first week of therapy, in patients with erosive esophagitis.8 Moreover, vonoprazan has been found to provide more effective nighttime heartburn relief than lansoprazole in this patient population and has been shown to improve sleep quality within 1 week, a benefit not observed with lansoprazole. Recent research has indicated that tegoprazan exhibits more rapid and potent nighttime acid suppression compared with vonoprazan or esomeprazole when administered nocturnally.9 A network meta-analysis has further highlighted that vonoprazan is either equally or more effective than conventional PPIs in resolving heartburn on both Day 1 and Day 7 in patients with erosive esophagitis.10 Consequently, vonoprazan may be considered as a first-line therapy to alleviate symptoms and enhance patients' QOL.

The treatment efficacy of P-CABs for GERD requires meticulous assessment. Given the potential variation in acid suppressive effects and approved doses among P-CABs, direct comparison of treatment effects among them is challenging. Therefore, individual evaluation of each P-CAB is essential for future analyses, rather than considering them collectively as a group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃食管反流病中质子泵抑制剂与钾竞争性酸阻滞剂的比较
胃食管反流病(GERD)是一种发病率很高的疾病,对患者的生活质量(QOL)有很大影响,而且其全球发病率正在不断上升。胃食管反流病的治疗目标包括缓解症状、治愈食管炎症和预防并发症。尤其是食管糜烂的愈合,传统上一直被强调为临床试验的客观指标和主要终点。在这种情况下,Simadibrate 等人1 在本期杂志上发表的研究结果支持了钾竞争性胃酸阻滞剂(P-CABs)作为胃食管反流病维持疗法的潜在优势。P-CABs 的开发是为了满足传统质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 未被满足的需求,它能快速、持久、可逆地抑制质子泵(H+、K+ ATPase α 亚基)。2 近期的其他荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析评估了沃诺普拉赞、凯韦普拉赞和替戈普拉赞对胃食管反流病维持治疗的疗效。尤其是在维持胃食管反流治疗方面,沃诺普拉赞的疗效优于传统的 PPIs,特别是在严重反流性食管炎的病例中。然而,只有一项研究表明,在维持治疗期间,24 小时无烧心天数明显增加,而且五分之一的胃食管反流病患者在接受 20 毫克冯诺普拉赞或 15 毫克兰索拉唑的维持治疗后仍有症状。此外,除了单纯抑制胃酸分泌外,改善胃食管反流症状的治疗方法仍有待开发。P-CABs的安全性仍不确定,特别是在胃癌发展和肠道微生物群改变这一有争议的问题上。此外,有关凯伐普拉赞和替戈普拉赞长期安全性的数据也很少。在评估胃食管反流治疗的疗效时,不同剂量的 P-CABs 的胃酸抑制程度不同是一个重要的考虑因素。鉴于已观察到幽门螺杆菌根除率和胃泌素水平在 P-CABs 之间存在差异,评估这些药物的胃酸抑制程度和潜在的不同效果就变得至关重要。值得注意的是,随着 vonoprazan 剂量的增加,夜间胃酸突破(NAB)的发生率明显降低,6 这与夜间胃酸抑制有限的传统 PPIs 形成鲜明对比。7 在胃食管反流病的初始治疗中,由于 PPIs 起效缓慢,约有三分之二的患者在服用首剂 PPIs 后仍有反流症状,甚至约有一半的患者在治疗 3 天后仍有反流症状。与兰索拉唑相比,Vonoprazan 可快速抑制胃酸,在完全缓解胃灼热方面,尤其是在治疗的第一周内,对侵蚀性食管炎患者显示出卓越的疗效。8 此外,在这类患者中,Vonoprazan 可比兰索拉唑更有效地缓解夜间胃灼热,并可在一周内改善睡眠质量,这是兰索拉唑所无法观察到的。9 一项网络荟萃分析进一步强调,在解决侵蚀性食管炎患者第 1 天和第 7 天胃灼热方面,vonoprazan 与传统 PPIs 相比具有相同或更高的疗效。因此,vonoprazan 可被视为缓解症状和提高患者 QOL 的一线疗法。鉴于 P-CABs 的抑酸效果和批准剂量可能存在差异,直接比较它们之间的治疗效果具有挑战性。因此,在未来的分析中,必须对每种 P-CAB 进行单独评估,而不是将它们作为一组药物进行综合考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Switching to Tenofovir Therapy Versus Continuation of Entecavir for Patients With Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Outcomes and validity of risk stratification tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in Western Australia Influence of patient characteristics on Helicobacter pylori eradication with Vonoprazan: A subgroup analysis of the pHalcon-HP trial Association between serum alder-specific immunoglobulin E positivity and seasonal onset of eosinophilic esophagitis Metastatic renal cell carcinoma presenting as gastrointestinal bleeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1