Alecia M. Santuzzi, Robert T. Keating, Jesus J. Martinez
{"title":"The Impact of Response Options On Formal Disclosure Rates for Disabilities in Organizations","authors":"Alecia M. Santuzzi, Robert T. Keating, Jesus J. Martinez","doi":"10.1177/10596011241258669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations collect disability-related information from employees to meet legislative requirements, foster inclusion, and respond to employee needs. However, there are likely more employees with disabilities than those who disclose at work. We tested whether altering the response option language on a disclosure form would increase disability disclosures, and whether increases differed by disability type and visibility. Employed adults were asked to identify as having a “disability,” “qualifying impairment,” “qualifying condition,” or “qualifying disability.” Results showed more disclosures when reporting a “qualifying condition” compared to a “disability,” especially among employees with a psychological or invisible disability. The manipulation of a single term on the disclosure form can increase reporting of disabilities, providing an evidence-based step to support inclusive organizational practices.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241258669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Organizations collect disability-related information from employees to meet legislative requirements, foster inclusion, and respond to employee needs. However, there are likely more employees with disabilities than those who disclose at work. We tested whether altering the response option language on a disclosure form would increase disability disclosures, and whether increases differed by disability type and visibility. Employed adults were asked to identify as having a “disability,” “qualifying impairment,” “qualifying condition,” or “qualifying disability.” Results showed more disclosures when reporting a “qualifying condition” compared to a “disability,” especially among employees with a psychological or invisible disability. The manipulation of a single term on the disclosure form can increase reporting of disabilities, providing an evidence-based step to support inclusive organizational practices.
期刊介绍:
Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.