The Impact of Response Options On Formal Disclosure Rates for Disabilities in Organizations

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Group & Organization Management Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1177/10596011241258669
Alecia M. Santuzzi, Robert T. Keating, Jesus J. Martinez
{"title":"The Impact of Response Options On Formal Disclosure Rates for Disabilities in Organizations","authors":"Alecia M. Santuzzi, Robert T. Keating, Jesus J. Martinez","doi":"10.1177/10596011241258669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations collect disability-related information from employees to meet legislative requirements, foster inclusion, and respond to employee needs. However, there are likely more employees with disabilities than those who disclose at work. We tested whether altering the response option language on a disclosure form would increase disability disclosures, and whether increases differed by disability type and visibility. Employed adults were asked to identify as having a “disability,” “qualifying impairment,” “qualifying condition,” or “qualifying disability.” Results showed more disclosures when reporting a “qualifying condition” compared to a “disability,” especially among employees with a psychological or invisible disability. The manipulation of a single term on the disclosure form can increase reporting of disabilities, providing an evidence-based step to support inclusive organizational practices.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241258669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations collect disability-related information from employees to meet legislative requirements, foster inclusion, and respond to employee needs. However, there are likely more employees with disabilities than those who disclose at work. We tested whether altering the response option language on a disclosure form would increase disability disclosures, and whether increases differed by disability type and visibility. Employed adults were asked to identify as having a “disability,” “qualifying impairment,” “qualifying condition,” or “qualifying disability.” Results showed more disclosures when reporting a “qualifying condition” compared to a “disability,” especially among employees with a psychological or invisible disability. The manipulation of a single term on the disclosure form can increase reporting of disabilities, providing an evidence-based step to support inclusive organizational practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回答选项对组织中残疾问题正式披露率的影响
各组织收集员工的残疾相关信息是为了满足立法要求、促进包容和满足员工需求。然而,有残疾的员工可能比在工作中披露信息的员工更多。我们测试了更改披露表上的回答选项语言是否会增加残疾披露率,以及残疾类型和可见度不同是否会增加披露率。受雇成年人被要求确认是否患有 "残疾"、"合格损伤"、"合格状况 "或 "合格残疾"。结果显示,与 "残疾 "相比,报告 "合格条件 "时披露的信息更多,尤其是在患有心理残疾或隐形残疾的员工中。在披露表上使用单一术语可以增加残疾报告,为支持包容性组织实践提供了一个循证步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Drivers for Nominating First Women Executives: Empirical Evidence From Japanese Firms The Value of Small Samples to Groups and Teams Research: Accumulating Knowledge across Philosophies of Science It’s About Time! Understanding the Dynamic Team Process-Performance Relationship Using Micro- and Macroscale Time Lenses Women’s Double Penalty During Telework: A Mixed Method Investigation of the Gender Effect of Interruptions Between Work and Childcare When Does Entrepreneurs’ Impression Management Enhance Their Networking Performance? The Cross-Level Moderating Role of Collective Altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1