The receiver operating characteristic curve accurately assesses imbalanced datasets

IF 6.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Patterns Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100994
Eve Richardson, Raphael Trevizani, Jason A. Greenbaum, Hannah Carter, Morten Nielsen, Bjoern Peters
{"title":"The receiver operating characteristic curve accurately assesses imbalanced datasets","authors":"Eve Richardson, Raphael Trevizani, Jason A. Greenbaum, Hannah Carter, Morten Nielsen, Bjoern Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2024.100994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many problems in biology require looking for a “needle in a haystack,” corresponding to a binary classification where there are a few positives within a much larger set of negatives, which is referred to as a class imbalance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the associated area under the curve (AUC) have been reported as ill-suited to evaluate prediction performance on imbalanced problems where there is more interest in performance on the positive minority class, while the precision-recall (PR) curve is preferable. We show via simulation and a real case study that this is a misinterpretation of the difference between the ROC and PR spaces, showing that the ROC curve is robust to class imbalance, while the PR curve is highly sensitive to class imbalance. Furthermore, we show that class imbalance cannot be easily disentangled from classifier performance measured via PR-AUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many problems in biology require looking for a “needle in a haystack,” corresponding to a binary classification where there are a few positives within a much larger set of negatives, which is referred to as a class imbalance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the associated area under the curve (AUC) have been reported as ill-suited to evaluate prediction performance on imbalanced problems where there is more interest in performance on the positive minority class, while the precision-recall (PR) curve is preferable. We show via simulation and a real case study that this is a misinterpretation of the difference between the ROC and PR spaces, showing that the ROC curve is robust to class imbalance, while the PR curve is highly sensitive to class imbalance. Furthermore, we show that class imbalance cannot be easily disentangled from classifier performance measured via PR-AUC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接收者操作特征曲线可准确评估不平衡数据集
生物学中的许多问题都需要 "大海捞针",即在二元分类中,在一组大得多的阴性样本中存在少数阳性样本,这就是所谓的类不平衡。据报道,接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)和相关的曲线下面积(AUC)并不适合评估不平衡问题的预测性能,因为在不平衡问题中,人们更关心的是对少数阳性类的预测性能,而精确度-召回(PR)曲线则更为可取。我们通过模拟和实际案例研究表明,这是对 ROC 和 PR 空间差异的误解,ROC 曲线对类不平衡具有鲁棒性,而 PR 曲线对类不平衡高度敏感。此外,我们还表明,类不平衡与通过 PR-AUC 测量的分类器性能不能轻易区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patterns
Patterns Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
AnnoMate: Exploring and annotating integrated molecular data through custom interactive visualizations Balancing innovation and integrity in peer review The stacking cell puzzle To democratize research with sensitive data, we should make synthetic data more accessible FAIM: Fairness-aware interpretable modeling for trustworthy machine learning in healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1